Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Elon Musk/2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
fmt !vote
 
Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Elon Musk/2|Elon Musk]]===
{{atopr}}
 
: {{al|Elon Musk|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Elon_Musk/2&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Elon Musk/GA1|Most recent review]]
: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Elon Musk/2|[[Category:GAR/87]]}} '''Result''': Strong consensus for expedited delisting.</span> [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 15:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)<br/>
: {{GAR/current}}<br/>
Prior issues were raised by editors at [[Talk:Elon Musk/Archive 22#Good Article Concerns]], though no action was taken to follow up on them. The largest issues in this article relate to stability and citations. On stability, article content has changed significantly week after week and it can no longer be assumed that there is a consistent level of quality, in addition to the various disputes that have arisen in the last six months since Musk has become involved with the U.S. federal government. As far as citations, a non-negligible amount of work would have to go into improving them, namely in the "Politics" section. The [[User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/CiteHighlighter|CiteHighlighter]] script may be useful here. <span style="font-family: monospace;">[[User talk:ElijahPepe|elijahpepe@wikipedia]] (he/him)</span> 03:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
:{{a note}} Please note [[WP:GAR]]: {{green|"Instability in itself is not a reason to delist an article."}} [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 12:03, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
Line 11:
:[[User:Czarking0|Czarking0]] ([[User talk:Czarking0|talk]]) 15:54, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
*'''Support delisting''', despite getting this page down from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Elon_Musk/Archive_22#c-Some1-20250203004300-CommunityNotesContributor-20250203003600 14.6K words to 5.8K], and it now being back at 7k words, there's still a lot I don't believe meets GA criteria, namely as suggested enough of the citations. I did my best trimming to [[WP:SS|summary style]], but I still think there are likely undue weight issues. Fundamentally it's nothing like the original GA and would require full check to get it there. Probably the article itself should settle down before even considering nomination also, given the content disputes etc. [[User:CommunityNotesContributor|CNC]] ([[User talk:CommunityNotesContributor|talk]]) 17:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}