Template talk:Db-notice
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | Template:Db-notice is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, the talk pages of all speedy deletion ("db-name-notice") and post-deletion ("db-name-deleted") notice templates redirect here. Please specify which one(s) you're referring to in any thread you start. |
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Template-protected edit request on 18 February 2025
edit | This edit request to Template:Db-deleted-multiple has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
WP:T5 support should be added to this template per the instructions at Wikipedia:Speedy deletion/Creating a new criterion since {{db-t5-deleted}} exists. I've provided the code for this in TM:db-deleted-multiple/sandbox and have made the same change to the unprotected TM:db-notice-multiple. Nickps (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Adding obscured page link to db-attack-notice
editAt this ANI thread we had an issue where TheTechnician27 sent a G10 notice to Trade, who wasn't responsible for the content at issue, and Trade could not figure out what page was being nominated. I understand the logic behind not including the page's title in the warning: Often, G10able pages have titles that would need to be removed or revdelled. However, we do have a way to link to a page without including its title: Special:Redirect. Would there be any objection to, in {{db-attack-notice}}, changing "A page you created" to [[Special:Redirect/page/{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>PAGEID:{{{1}}}}}|A page you created]]? This would generate output like A page you created. Note that this link will stop working once the page is deleted, which is a good thing: See Special:Redirect/page/79982707, which uses the former page ID for User:Tamzin/deletion test but no longer works. As far as I can see, the only downside to doing this would be a very slight visibility boost to the CSD'd page, but that page will already be in CAT:CSD and any number of things that mirror it; I think the pros outweigh the cons of giving a link for the notified user to click to see which page is nominated. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|🤷) 06:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 23 May 2025
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Removal of |left| and a break for better dark mode rendering
Please look at the source of this message since MediaWiki formatting goof didn't let me put it down properly in the visual editor. the 🥭 man (the 🥭 talk) 14:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Unit Mango: Please don't paste code blobs into the talk page. They are hard to understand and even more difficult to test. Please use the sandbox as directed above; see also WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- They also break the rest of the page, so this is definitely a case of
Not done: please make your requested changes to the template's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 4 August 2025
edit| | This edit request to Template:Db-notice-multiple has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add support for the new G15 criterion. I tried using this template with G15 and it does not work. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
Done I've added just enough code for it to work as a minimum-viable product. The template should support G15. If we want to make it fancier and have a blurb like the wizard box to show up, we should have further discussion here. Sohom (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! I updated the documentation to reflect this. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Additionally param's template text needs a comma
editPlease change
{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#ifeq: {{{additionally|}}}|||Additionally {{{additionally}}}}}<noinclude>to
{{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>#ifeq: {{{additionally|}}}|||Additionally, {{{additionally}}}}}<noinclude>I did not like how I had to put an en dash in Template:Db-llm-deleted, otherwise it would have been "Additionally if you would like", which lacks a comma. The missing-comma use is seen in Template:Db-a10-notice and elsewhere. —Alalch E. 14:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)