Template talk:Infobox train

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Infoboxes This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Trains Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

Owner

I think it should say who owns each train i.e. Porterbrook owns the Class 458, 460, 158 and 159 units, just to pick 4 examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdiddyjr (talk • contribs) 15:58, 10 April 2012‎

What exactly does "successor" mean?

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What exactly does "successor" mean? Does it mean the next train to be produced after that train? Or does it mean the train that replaces that train when it is withdrawn from service? Steelkamp (talk) 05:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Multiple Working

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Multiple Working linked is likely too specific as it is the British Multiple Working. This should probably be changed to Multiple-unit train control to be more generic and applicable properly to trains outside Great Britain. Object-Concept (talk) 18:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)Reply