Training modules/dashboard/slides/11011-MEDRS-quiz/pt
MEDRS quiz
Teste você mesmo!
Which of the following is NOT a good source for medical statements on Wikipedia?
(Discuta esta questão)
- literature reviews or systematic reviews found in reputable medical journals (clique para expandir ou ocultar)INCORRECT. Literature reviews, and systematic reviews, are great sources for Wikipedia content, because they reflect a broad consensus of the current knowledge in the field.
- medical guidelines or position statements from nationally or internationally recognized expert bodies (clique para expandir ou ocultar)INCORRECT.This is a fine source, as long as it reflects consensus in the field.
- a study of 1,700 patients published in a reputable medical journal (clique para expandir ou ocultar)CORRECT! While the science may be good, this is a POOR source for medical articles on Wikipedia, because it's a primary source.
- academic and professional books written by experts in the relevant field, from a respected publisher (clique para expandir ou ocultar)INCORRECT. Academic and professional texts from reliable publishers are great sources for Wikipedia articles.