Wikipedia

User:DangerousPanda/toolbox

< User:DangerousPanda
(Redirected from User:Bwilkins/toolbox)

[my tools]

Dashboard

edit

CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 37
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 20
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 19
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 214
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 15
Open sockpuppet investigations 196
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

edit

Administrative backlog

edit
AfD debates relisted 3 or more times
All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of unknown date
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
User talk:XLinkBot/RevertList
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

edit

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

edit

Bot-reported

edit

User-reported

edit


CSD / PRODs

edit

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 0
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 1
Other candidates 13

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 127 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 1 item

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

edit

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

edit

User-reported

edit
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

edit
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Upcoming Lana Del Rey album

edit

Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – No firm indication of when album will come out yet or even what it will be titled. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – The Movie: Infinity Castle

edit

Indefinite semi-protection: Unconstructive edits and occasional vandalism from IP editors, likely to remain frequent until the trilogy concludes. Go D. Usopp (talk) 04:04, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

List of water sports

edit

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking by several IPs and unconfirmed users. CycloneYoris talk! 09:38, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Major film studios

edit

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This happened again, an anonymous user keeps bringing back the same fake company Red Rocket Entertainment and changing most of the table without any sources. We should also consider a warning to editors. This happened several times or more. XyloQuip289 (talk) 12:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Boxxy (Internet phenomenon)

edit

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: This redirect page should be get a indefinitely extended confirmed protection to prevent vandalism on these pages for the future time. 158.140.164.22 (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 12:54, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Najee Harris

edit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most if not all non-autoconfirmed edits are non-constructive or changing his middle name back to Jerome after he said that wasn't his middle name in the video that caused this disruption. Pending changes is not suitable here. Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Horrible Histories (2000 TV series)

edit

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: – This has been going on for months Myexellentdays (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Gizele Thakral

edit

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Zuck28 (talk) 13:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

National Movement (Poland)

edit

Reason: Extended confirmed protection: Continued edit warring and a talk page resolution that has devolved into personal insults and general bickering. ⛿ WeaponizingArchitecture | yell at me 14:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Evangelos Zappas

edit

Reason: POV-pushing IPs edit-warring to remove select ethnic background information from the article, including the removal of ten reliable sources [1] [2] [3].

By the way, the article has already been protected many times [4]. In fact, this IP has come right after the last 1 year-long protection expired. Maybe consider indefinite protection. Super Ψ Dro 14:02, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Melanie C discography

edit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extended period of vandalism by anonymous editor(s). livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:05, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Rafaelthegreat

edit

Extended confirmed protection: I don't want another user to edit this page, I just want me to. A not extended confirmed user could also vandalize this page. That's why. ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 14:10, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

2025 Nasser Hospital strikes

edit

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA. Entranced98 (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Bite Me (album)

edit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of same editing activity which led to previous protections. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Benson Boone

edit

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Noakhali riots

edit

Reason: Longstanding persistent IP vandalism. Requesting permanent minimum autoconfirmed access for editing the article. EarthDude (wanna talk?) 14:25, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

2025 Nasser Hospital strikes

edit

Reason: New article that falls under contentious topic restrictions WP:CT/ARBPIA and needs extended-confirmed protection. -- Reconrabbit 14:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

edit
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

edit
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

edit
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

1 protected edit request
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Tarleton helmetTarleton helmet (request) 2025-08-08 19:53 Fully protected (log) Protected by Ohnoitsjamie on 2024-01-17: "Persistent sockpuppetry"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 03:55, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
19 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia:Peer review (request) 2025-08-01 09:05 Title blacklist (log) Matching line: Template:Editnotices\/.* <noedit|errmsg=titleblacklist-custom-editnotice>
Template:Hidden archive top (request) 2025-08-03 09:01 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-08-01: "Highly visible template: per WP:RFPP request"
Template:Infobox court case/images (request) 2025-08-04 20:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:WikiProject Germany (request) 2025-08-05 14:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-17: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:IPA vowels/table (request) 2025-08-07 17:34 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox organization (request) 2025-08-12 16:11 Template-protected (log) Protected by Wugapodes on 2020-04-12: "Highly visible template: Restore protection after undeletion"
Template:Merge (request) 2025-08-12 19:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rfd2 (request) 2025-08-13 13:15 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fuhghettaboutit on 2014-12-31: "Highly visible template"
Template:Under construction (request) 2025-08-13 21:54 Template-protected (log) Modified by Diannaa on 2014-10-13: "Highly visible template: Transclusion count is only part of the story, as the template is constantly added/removed as work progresses"
Template:Infobox Wikipedia user (request) 2025-08-18 01:48 Template-protected (log) Modified by Samsara on 2017-01-13: "lowering move prot to tp, in line with current policy"
Module:Routemap (request) 2025-08-18 07:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Materialscientist on 2016-11-21: "Highly visible template"
Template:Article for deletion (request) 2025-08-18 15:03 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Afd2 (request) 2025-08-20 19:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Edit COI (request) 2025-08-21 00:54 Template-protected (log) From Template:Request edit: Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Nutshell (request) 2025-08-22 09:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-12: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Legend (request) 2025-08-23 01:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Collapsible lists option (request) 2025-08-23 21:20 Template-protected (log) Protected by Zzuuzz on 2018-01-13: "High risk template"
Template:Please see (request) 2025-08-24 15:17 Template-protected (log) Protected by Anarchyte on 2020-05-17: "Highly visible template: Over 6,500 uses."
Template:Broken anchors (request) 2025-08-26 13:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2025-08-11: "High-risk template or module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:21, 26 August 2025 (UTC)


WP:RFA

edit

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

edit

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Yoblyblob

edit

Requested this permission ~2 months ago, denied because I was mostly creating auto-notable stubs. I think I have expanded the types of articles I create, including well-sourced local pages or biographical entries where I take time to source subjects that do not inherently meet a generic notability criteria. (I still do create auto-notable pages sometimes, but those no longer make up the majority of pages I create.) As a new page reviewer, I got good experience with the notability guidelines reviewing articles during the backlog drive WP:MAY25, and also participating in AfD. Thought about requesting again as I have run into a few of my own pages while reviewing pages that are in topics I contribute to/am interested in. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Also wanted to mention that if I am unsure of a subject's notability, I will utilize WP:AFC for my own articles occasionally Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 02:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Came here to request this permission for a different user, but since Yoblyblob is referencing their WP:MAY25 NPP work, it is worth noting that among the re-reviews of each patroller's work, 14/17 of their patrol decisions were approved. Of the remainder, two were drafted/redirected as WP:TOOSOON coverage of 2026 state elections and one was drafted for lacking enough coverage to qualify under WP:NEVENT. Considering they were the fifth most active patroller of the drive, this accuracy is good, not great. ViridianPenguin🐧 (💬) 19:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, I took note of that during the drive. I may have tried to do too much too soon into being granted the permission, but would like to think I take a lot more care now during reviews. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 01:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

User:CherryPie94

edit

I was granted a two month trial for this. Have created 100+ articles with 10K+ edits and will continue to do so. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:19, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 July 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 23:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
The sourcing provided here does not appear to meet WP:NORG, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject". Can you provide sources that establish the notability of this organization? voorts (talk/contributions) 22:22, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
I agree some of the sourcing used is WP:CORPTRIV — the foundation has extensive coverage in Korea. I've just added some stronger pieces. The pre/post interview text in this Forbes feature is one with significant secondary coverage. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
 Not done NORG requires secondary coverage. Those are all primary news stories. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
I'm okay without the role, or a trial if possible, but can't WP:SECONDARY sources rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them? Tech42 Donga demonstrate. I will admit this article is hard to find excellent secondary sources for because there just are so many about the organization. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts: The distinction between primary and secondary sources is sometimes debateable, but by the standards set out in WP:NORG, the news stories seem to fit -- that guideline explicitly says that an NYT article, a blog post and a Forbes profile would be considered secondary, while the text of a court filing would be primary. However, WP:ENDURING may apply regardless. UndercoverClassicist T·C 14:42, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Onatic

edit

As part of the Women in Red project, I create pages about women by translating, adapting, and improving articles from the Spanish Wikipedia. Onatic (talk) 21:00, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 23:59, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Luxtaythe2nd

edit

I have created more than 25 non redirect articles within the past few weeks and 53 non redirects overall. The two mainspace ones that have been deleted were by my own request, thanks to a slip of the "Publish changes" button. Aside from those, all have been approved by the adminteam. I would greatly be thankful to receive this permission. Luxtaythe2nd (Talk to me...) 17:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Why is citypopulation.de a reliable source? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:03, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Shahnamk

edit

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created around 30 well-sourced, policy-compliant articles on the English Wikipedia.

In addition to my contributions here, I am an administrator (sysop) on the Persian Wikipedia (fa.wikipedia), where I have been active for many years, focusing on content creation, vandalism control, and community support.

Granting this right would help reduce the workload of new page patrollers, as my article creations usually meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Best regards, Shahnamk (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:NONENG, "English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones when they are available and of equal quality and relevance". For In the Mesh, did you search for English-language sources? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Also, it appears that you translated the article from fa:چرخدنده (کتاب) without attribution, which is required per Help:Translation#Licensing. Could you please repair the attribution for that article and any others that you translated from fa-wiki without attribution? voorts (talk/contributions) 00:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Sweetabena

edit

Hello,

I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I’ve created several articles, many of which are currently live and meet Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability and reliable sourcing.

I’m familiar with the key content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, and WP:NPOV, and consistently apply them when creating or editing articles.

I understand that this permission is intended to reduce the workload of new page reviewers by marking trusted users’ pages as reviewed automatically, and I believe my contributions demonstrate the consistency and policy alignment expected for this role.

I have not received any blocks or serious warnings, and I’m committed to continuing constructive, policy-compliant editing.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Sweetabena (talk) 23:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Sweetabena: I’ve gone through some of the articles you’ve created, including Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy. I noticed that these pages have been tagged for AI-generated content (WP:LLM). Could you please clarify this? Additionally, the article on Bright Owusu has a notability issue. Have you made any efforts to address or fix that? I also noticed that most of your articles are about politicians or MPs, which is generally a relatively easier area for a New Page Patroller. Regards! Baqi:) (talk) 12:15, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Jannatulbaqi,
Thanks for your response and for reviewing my request.
I've now gone through the articles you mentioned; Daniel Dung Mahama, Simon Akibange Aworigo, Anabah Thomas Winsum, and Nikyema Billa Alamzy and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style.
Regarding Bright Owusu, I realized that the subject is better known publicly as “C-Confion,” which is the name used in most reliable sources. I initially created a redirect page under that name, and since C-Confion better reflects WP:COMMONNAME, I’ve submitted a technical move request at WP:RM/TR to move the article accordingly.
While many of my articles are in the political space, I’ve focused on that area because it's typically easier to demonstrate notability. That said, I’m open to expanding into other areas and continuing to improve the range and quality of my contributions.
I appreciate your time and consideration, and I remain committed to constructive, policy-compliant editing. Thank you so much.Sweetabena (talk) 21:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
I don't think answers the implicit question, Sweetabena, which is "did you use AI" in the first place? Also, I confess parts of your comment seem a little LLM-y particularly and made revisions to ensure they fully reflect a human-authored tone, improve clarity, and adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies. I manually wrote these articles based on reliable sources, and I’ve taken extra care to revise any sections that might have appeared too generic or AI-like in style, although the misuse of the semicolon before the list of articles looks like a legit human error. Please divulge the extent to which you have used AI in your editing. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 00:14, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi Cremastra Yes, I have used ChatGPT to assist with drafting some article content. However, I review, fact-check, and revise it to ensure it maintains a human-authored standard and aligns with Wikipedia's content policies. I see AI as a support tool, not a replacement for editorial responsibility.Sweetabena (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
 Not done AI use and using AI to respond to concerns about AI use are both very concerning. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:17, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:AdobongPogi

edit

As a part of Wikipedia: Tambayan Philippines and the Music Task Force, I would like to request the autopatrolled user right. I have created over 25 articles, most of which are currently live and have been built with careful attention to WP:N, WP:V, and reliable sourcing. And also I understand that the autopatrolled right is meant to ease the workload of new page reviewrs by automatically marking new pages from trusted users as reviewed. Thank you! AdobongPogi masarap 🍛 04:21, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Comment: AdobongPogi, your article Popo (film) need to address this. Administrators will flag that and it might affect your request as autopatrolled. But i will Weak Support for this. ROY is WAR Talk! (Non-administrator comment) 08:22, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

User:AlphaBetaGamma

edit

Had my first AP request declined due to my poor judgement with notability of railway stations. I've learned from that mistake (and cleaned up after myself), and I've created articles like Expo 2025 pavilions (Although this was a collaboration with Epicgenius) and Magical Girl Witch Trials since my request was declined. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 01:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Link to their first request. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 00:23, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:GregariousMadness

edit

Hello! I've created a large number of My Little Pony and mathematics articles. I have over 6,700 edits and will continue to edit for as long as I can. I'm requesting autopatrol permissions so that the NPP backlog will be less cluttered with my articles. I believe I've demonstrated a solid understanding of the policies and guidelines with my articles, particularly with my coverage of various aspects of the My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic fandom. Thank you! GregariousMadness (talk to me!) 17:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Queenofboston

edit

I have created more than 25 articles, over several years. I learnt over time to understand the notability criteria well. My new pages do not require attention from patrollers. Only one page I created is marked as deleted (it was recreated under a slightly different name). I have overall over 1000 edits. Thank you for the consideration. Queenofboston (talk) 12:24, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

@Queenofboston: Thank you for your contributions. Spot-checking one of your creations at random, Michelle Meagher, indicated direct copying from a source (report) and non-neutral prose ("Meagher was confronted with a crisis of consciousness", also closely paraphrased from the source). I'll leave a message on your talk page with more information about copyright considerations on Wikipedia, and I would recommend reading about the encyclopedic tone that should be used in articles. For these reasons, I don't think autopatrolled would be appropriate for you at the moment. Please let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
@TechnoSquirrel69 the article you singled out for copyright issues was published in 2024. The Michelle Meagher Wikipedia entry was created by me in 2023 with the contested phrase in it. So the 2024 article copied the 2023 Wikipedia page not the other way round. I did not infringe any copyright of the 2024 article as it did not exist at the time of the page creation. Queenofboston (talk) 18:02, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
I'm not seeing a date on the Green European Journal page, although it was only archived in the Wayback Machine in 2024. Even leaving that aside, though, there remain the issues of neutrality and close paraphrasing.
I looked at another one of your creations for more information. Your most recent one, Aline Blankertz, has statements without citations, and doesn't demonstrate the subject's notability — the existing sources are either primary sources, like interviews or podcast appearances, or don't have significant coverage of the subject. However, I will note that I found no copyright-related issues here. I maintain that it would be beneficial for your creations to get a once-over from new pages patrol. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:52, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
The information you flagged as missing citation was contained in the sources cited immediately prior, I now double-cite them in the two instances you flagged.
I am not saying that my pages cannot be improved but my pages bring additions to Wikipedia. I focus on women as it is an objective of Wikipedia to re-balance the coverage away from a bias favoring pages of men Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, I believe this is valuable contribution. There are profiles of Aline Blankertz in leading German media outlets, only one source is a podcast and it is produced by an established German media outlet, that is a valid source in my understanding, it is not a podcast produced by the subject. None of the sources in that article are authored by the subject of the article. My pages do not have copyrights issues, as now clarified. I use some sources in foreign languages but it is not the policy of Wikipedia to disregard or downgrade sources that are in foreign languages for purposes of notability. Queenofboston (talk) 09:13, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

User:OceanGunfish

edit

I have created 38 articles in the last year and a half, with 0 deletions. I have brought two of my most recent five creations to GA status. I am very careful to make sure every statement in my creations is properly sourced and I hope to help reduce the workload at NPP. OceanGunfish (talk) 19:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

+1 (Non-administrator comment) Spot-checked. Seems a good candidate. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 14:01, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:MallardTV

edit

I have, in my time on Wikipedia, created numerous new articles. I do admit that a decent number of them have been species articles, but I make sure that they are all expanded from a stub if possible. I have waited for a while to request this, and I do think that it is finally time. MallardTV Talk to me! 15:42, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Masohpotato

edit

I am requesting autopatrolled rights to decrease NPP backlog. I have created 400+ articles, and have demonstrated knowledge of notability guidelines throughout 3 and a half years editing. I have not edited for about a month, but plan to get back into Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Masohpotato (talk) 05:18, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Memer15151

edit

After a few months break, I have decided to become active on the English Wikipedia once more. In this new period of activity, I look forward to creating new articles of high quality. As a New page patroller myself, I know how much of a backlog there is. Since I have created a considerable amount of clean articles in the past (mostly related to history, geography and entomology), and am hoping to make many more in the future, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to slightly ease the work of patrollers such as myself. Thank you! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 21:44, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Greenleader(2)

edit

I have created 46 pages currently, and in my more recent Wikipedia editing experience have focused largely on creating high quality and well sourced pages on politicians who automatically pass WP:NPOL, as well as having created pages on political parties, figures, and elections that clearly meet other or general notability guidelines. Having this permission would therefore help free up the workload of new page reviewers. Greenleader(2) (talk) 14:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Hteiktinhein

edit

I am returning to request full rights after the three-month trial period expired. During the trial period, I encountered no issues and successfully created many articles to contribute to Women in Red/Missing articles by nationality/Myanmar. Hteiktinhein (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

User:B33tleMania12

edit

This user was discovered through the New Pages Feed. They are an editor who has learned a lot about good practices in creating articles and are consistent in working within the bounds of the notability guideline for species. The only mark against them is that many of these pages are created without a talk page. The vast majority are stubs, but that is to be expected for many of the subject species, and enough information is provided in most cases to allow for identification. -- Reconrabbit 13:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot talk 13:50, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) User has created over 2k articles, but these articles are short, some are single-sentence, some are double, in a nutshell, they're too short for them to really be able to demonstrate that they could write up a full-fledge article without issues like copy vio or close paraphrasing–which requires an editor to write, say start article, or even stubs that are over 90% rating (10% remaining to become a start-class); this is just my analysis. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Requests for file mover

File mover

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:SecretName101

edit

I occasionally upload files, and would appreciate being able to remedy any errant titles on my own in the instances that a mis-spelling might occur. I do not intend to make overly-broad use of this right; rather plan to use it sparely to quickly-repair any such necessary issues as they might errantly occur. SecretName101 (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@SecretName101: Have you made any other rename requests than this one? ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 05:52, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover


Page mover

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:WeatherWriter

edit

I have been editing for a long time, with nearly now 34,000 contributions to EN-wiki and over 41,000 total contributions across other projects (like the Commons, with hundreds of uploads). I have also done 371 page moves, primarily draftspace to mainspace. Honestly, having the page move permission would stop me having to request deletion of redirects, only to wait several hours with no page mover checking the non-controversial speedy delete category, and just decide to do a new name to get a draft into mainspace. It would make editing a little more convenient for me and also take an extra possible task off administrator workloads. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:30, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Page movers can't delete redirects, they can suppress creating ones when moving however. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:35, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Oh. What perm do I need to request to delete a redirect prior to a draftspace --> mainspace move? I'm still requesting the page mover right, since with it, I could always do round-robin to accomplish what I described above. But, is there a specific perm that allows for the redirect deletion, or is that only administrators? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:46, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Only administrators currently can delete existing redirects as far as I know. Page movers can move over those redirects if they don't have significant history though. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:50, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Gotcha! Hopefully an administrator believes granting me the page mover perm fully will be beneficial to Wikipedia for round-robin moves. I was previously granted it on a three-month temporary basis. Thank you for clearing up my question! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 21:24, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Normal users can delete a redirect, if the page they're moving to is a redirect back to its title, and only has a single page history (WP:MOR). JuniperChill (talk) 22:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done Clear use for the perm. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:55, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

User:JuniperChill

edit

I remember requesting the right at the last day of 2024, and suddenly had to take a break from Wikipedia until June. I totally forgot I only had this right for two months and thought I would lose it after 12 months of inactivity. But anyway, I am requesting this tool to help out at WP:RM/TR (and closing RMs) seeing I made a few RM/TR requests and performed some since my wikibreak. JuniperChill (talk) 22:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Thank you for helping out with RMs, however none of your RM 4 noms this year resulted in a move, which is a bit concerning for me. However, I will note that the two RM discussions participated in (that were not your RM nom), your view was in alignment with consensus. TiggerJay (talk) 23:40, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Although the RMs of Talk:Sun Haven and Talk:Melbourne Airport (suburb) were successful. I also made a bold move of Virgin Trains (open-access operator) by adding a hyphen. and have requested an RMTR move of Kent Station to Kent station without being reverted. JuniperChill (talk) 00:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
I apologize for the oversight, your RM for the airport did not show up in the toolforge search linked above. I'll defer to an admin to further process your request. I will say this is not a strict object, but simply a comment on observed activity. TiggerJay (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 2 months. Since you didn't use this improperly the first time (when I granted it previously), I'll give you the same opportunity now. Since you only used it once before your wikibreak, I would like to see more of a track record before extending it indefinitely. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Rickyurs

edit

With 7 years experience as an editor, I am familiar with the various use of rights. Presently I have made around 85,000 edits and created 1044 articles in the main space. I feel the need of Page mover rights to deal with redirects and disregard of naming conventions. I assure you that I will not misuse the feature. Thanks in anticipation. Rickyurs (talk) 04:20, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

 Not done You don't really have a history of making those kinds of page moves and have very limited RM/TR and RM history. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

User:CNMall41

edit

I fight a lot of SPAM, UPE, and SOCKS which often leads me to move pages to draft space from main space. Having page mover will help me suppress the redirect and save admins time. I am not sure if this will help with accepting drafts which have a redirect title occupying the main space, but I have reviewed over 4,000 page at AfC so it would be helpful with that as well. CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

This would be useful for publishing drafts via round-robin swap rather than {{db-afc-move}} (and for draftification). However, WP:PMCRITERIA#4 isn't satisfied due to a 36hr EW pblock (not for 3RR).
~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 17:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
@SilverLocust:, Thanks for the question. I did review and know there was a 3RR in the last six months and won't give my opinion on it other than it was correct on its face. Only block in my 11 years here and I took the last line of PMCRITERIA to mean you have the right to grant it despite, and also have the right to deny even if I met all those requirements. If you would prefer me to wait until that period has ended I can do so. Was just trying to help save others some time. Ether way, thanks for consideration. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:51, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
When seeking an exception, you should disclose that you don't meet the guidelines. (That you didn't disclose that, along with your uncertainty that this would help with accepting drafts, made me question whether you had read relevant parts of the page.) ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 18:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
You are correct. I should not have assumed that you would assume. Definitely was not hiding anything but I should have pointed it out since it was one of the criteria. That is 100% on me. The question I had about whether or not it would be relevant was to do with moves to the mainspace where a redirect already occupies the title. My understanding is that I would still need an administrator to delete that redirect so I can move. Is that correct? --CNMall41 (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
No, as I tried to explain in my first sentence, a page mover can swap a draft with a redirect. See, for example, Draft:Ben Mayes (cricketer)Draft:Ben Mayes (cricketer) (revision history), which was swapped with Ben Mayes (cricketer). ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 03:49, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Well, I read it a few times and for some reason the wires in my brain are not lining up. I think it would be best to withdraw this request as I do not want a tool that I do not fully understand. For some reason I cannot even get my head around the example you provided. I apologize for wasting your time here. Maybe in the future it will click and I will be back. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
All right. I was still considering the request, depending on Inanvector not expressing objections.  Request withdrawn for the bot. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 05:41, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
And I do appreciate that. I also hope there's no hard feelings for wasting your time. I just had to self-reflect on it a bit and realized I may not understand it as much as I initially thought. Nothing to do with the block. I wasn't happy about the whole circumstance surrounding it, but it is what it is and I would agree that it was a bright line block. I just think that it is better to not have a tool until I fully understand it. I'll likely be back. Cheers! --CNMall41 (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:WeatherWriter

edit

I am an active editor (over 34,000 contributions), familiar with all the necessary policies, including copyright guidelines. Pending changes is currently in place on an article I edit as well as monitor (Tornadoes of 2025), due to frequent vandalism from two LTAs (one of which is WP:LTA/A5) both of which I have sock-reported dozens of times in the last few years. Perm would allow me to accept or decline edits to the article as well as any other weather-related articles that get pending changes protected in the future. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 11:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

  • Funny enough, I just SPI-reported several LTA accounts that I discovered after requesting Pending Changes Protection on a different weather article. I’m mentioning this here since it might show another reason why it would be helpful for me to have this review perm. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:03, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
 Done asilvering (talk) 03:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Thilio

edit

Reasons why I am requesting rollback rights: Some registered editors or some IP editors know what they are doing is wrong, but they are still doing it adding wrong information about BLPs, changing names or birth years, months or days from right to wrong, and adding nonsensical contents just to hurt Wikipedia. I am against all of that. I'm requesting rollback rights because I am fighting vandalism and I won't stop not now not ever. The rollback tool will help me fight vandalism with confidence because some editors know what they are doing is 100% wrong (vandalism) but they just keep adding and adding. With the rollback tool rights, I can undo that in the blink of an eye. I understand that rollback is only for obvious vandalism or disruptive edits and not for content disputes. I will make sure I use the tool responsibly in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Thanks in advance. 🐍 Thilio🤖 13:21, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

User:MakaylaHippo1998

edit

I have made many mainspace edits and have started using the "Twinkle" feature regularly since my last request about two months ago. Feel more confident in this request. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 05:50, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot talk 06:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

User:JohnDavies9612

edit

Hello, I have read about Wikipedia:Rollback. I have understood many things. There are many vandalism activities that are done every day. I want to fight against vandalism and monitor every movement. I will try to do my best for everything. Thank you JohnDavies9612 (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot talk 12:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Coldupnorth

edit

Long-time editor but occasionally coming across vandalism or unconstructive edits that are often more than undoing just one single edit. I know I could copy and paste an early copy from the edit history but that seems counter-intuitive. While I would be honest and admit I would not likely use the function everyday, I would find the rollback option helpful occasionally. I have not been in edit-warring and would also make the case that I have demonstrated an ability to distinguish well-intentioned edits with minor issues from unconstructive vandalism over many years. Thank you. Coldupnorth (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC) Coldupnorth (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

User:GlorpK4

edit

Been doing a bit of anti-vandalism work in my spare time and I want to try out AV. Thx ✦GLORPK4✦  | 📡 03:57, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

User:Rht bd

edit

Will use it for fighting obvious vandalism in the recent changes. My account is old enough and I have made significant amounts of edits, I know the rules and policies of Wikipedia. - Rht bd (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC) Rht bd (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

edit
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

Footer

edit

Policies and links

    My tools

    edit
    • Welcome to a user who has been uncivil to start {{subst:User:Bwilkins/welcomecivil}} ~~~~
    • Quick note to someone who neglected to notify the other party {{subst:User:Bwilkins/didnotnotify}} ~~~~
    • Quick note about forum shopping {{subst:User:Bwilkins/forumshopping}} ~~~~
    • Warning to someone claiming to be an admin when they are not {{subst:User:Bwilkins/notanadmin}} ~~~~
    • My list of Barnstar userboxes
    • A nice way for people to say "sorry" without admitting fault in civility situations {{subst:User:Bwilkins/wasuncivil|*article that you appreciate*}}

    Other people's tools

    edit
    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 14:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DangerousPanda/toolbox&oldid=781576179"