Sdkb
| This is Sdkb's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
Tone check evaluation is now open
editHello
You signed-up to participate to the evaluation. Thank you for volunteering!
The feedback you share will help us assess and improve the performance of the Tone Check AI model.
The model is now ready to be tested, at this address: https://annotool.toolforge.org/projects/13
Annotool is the tool used by the Machine Learning team. You may be asked to log-in in order to start the evaluation.
Please read the instructions displayed on Annotool before beginning the evaluation.
If you have any question regarding the evaluation, please leave us a message on the project's talk page.
The evaluation will end on May 30. We really hope that you will enjoy working on evaluating the model!
Thank you again, Trizek_(WMF)
17:48, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- I went through some examples, Trizek (WMF). I initially got some
Failed to load resource. Server responded with: 500 ()
errors, which then mysteriously went away when I reloaded. There wasn't any sort of tracker of how many evaluations I made, so not sure if I did 30. Sdkb talk 20:31, 23 May 2025 (UTC)- Yes, we had a few 500 errors. They are now fixed; please let me know if they aren't.
- The tracker would be a nice to have feature, but I'm afraid it would be the next time. I checked a few edits for French as a test, and, as the process is quite straightforward, I rapidly passed the 30 threshold without noticing it. ^^
- Trizek_(WMF) (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Wiki Submission approval
editHello! I have submitted a Wiki page for Christine Huber and it has not been approved. Could you let me know what needs to be done to get it approved? TIA Kjeverett79 (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Kjeverett79, there is info in the note on your talk page about why it was not approved. You need to add references. Sdkb talk 18:01, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- I added in references at the end. Does it need to be done in a different way? Kjeverett79 (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- The article you submitted looked like this. On taking another look, it seems there was a hidden comment that was opened but never closed, causing the article to be cut off. I fixed that issue for you. I'd recommend using the preview function to catch stuff like that in the future and ensure the page looks how you're intending. You could try resubmitting it, but from a quick glance at the references, I don't think they're sufficient. The standard you need to show Huber meets is WP:NBIO, which requires references that provide "significant coverage" of Huber herself (e.g. a profile of her career, not just a mention that she commented on a sports event) from sources that are entirely independent of her (e.g. a newspaper article in a publication she does not work for). Sdkb talk 18:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Awesome! I found a bunch of article links. Do I just put them in at the bottom of my submission?
- Articles about Huber:
- UNH Hall of Fame Induction
- https://newhavenchargers.com/honors/hall-of-fame/christine-huber/120
- https://newhavenchargers.com/news/2013/4/7/GEN_0405131057.aspx
- https://newhavenchargers.com/news/2016/2/19/GEN_0210161841.aspx
- Tap Off College Basketball Player of the Year:
- https://books.google.com/books?id=cq5IAAAAIBAJ&pg=PA15&dq=%22Christine+Huber%22&article_id=1308,2601744&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiSs4i0q8uNAxUrTDABHY1uLd44KBC7BXoECAcQBw#v=onepage&q=%22Christine%20Huber%22&f=false
- Winning State Championship look back
- https://www.centralmaine.com/2021/02/19/center-court-rewind-in-1995-and-96-the-cony-girls-spent-two-years-on-a-mission/
- Coaching at Wilbur Cross
- https://www.nhregister.com/news/article/Governors-hope-Cross-roads-lead-to-success-11626249.php
- Coaching at Hamden Hall:
- https://www.nhregister.com/news/article/SOCCER-Hamden-Hall-Hopkins-girls-teams-trying-11569127.php Kjeverett79 (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- You can add them as references anywhere in the article draft, and then try resubmitting it. Good luck! Sdkb talk 15:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
- The article you submitted looked like this. On taking another look, it seems there was a hidden comment that was opened but never closed, causing the article to be cut off. I fixed that issue for you. I'd recommend using the preview function to catch stuff like that in the future and ensure the page looks how you're intending. You could try resubmitting it, but from a quick glance at the references, I don't think they're sufficient. The standard you need to show Huber meets is WP:NBIO, which requires references that provide "significant coverage" of Huber herself (e.g. a profile of her career, not just a mention that she commented on a sports event) from sources that are entirely independent of her (e.g. a newspaper article in a publication she does not work for). Sdkb talk 18:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- I added in references at the end. Does it need to be done in a different way? Kjeverett79 (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Explaining revert
editJust here to let you know that I undid your edit on Wikipedia:Task Center because it looked bad on mobile. Other than that, have a nice day! Mox Eden (talk) 13:14, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2025
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
Technical news
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
Arbitration
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Question from Nicole Mensi (17:20, 12 June 2025)
editJust now, I submitted an article about iBeesoft Data Recovery. For the purpose of rigor, I asked the developer about the algorithm and listed some. However, after I submitted it, someone thought it was an advertisement. Now, I deleted this part. Is this okay? To be honest, iBeesoft helped me recover important files when I didn't have money to buy the full version of data recovery software. Therefore, I hope to help them publish this article. --Nicole Mensi (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Nicole! I'll ping @User:Rambley, the reviewer who declined the draft submission, who will be able to tell you about what came across as promotional and how to improve it. Sdkb talk 17:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Nicole. Currently, the article does not read like a neutral encyclopedia article which is expected of Wikipedia articles; rather, much of the text reads like an advertisement, discussing things like pricing and features immediately upon reading.
- Articles should instead be written neutrally and in your own words, taking information from reliable sources. On that note, many of the sources cited within the article are either unreliable or only somewhat reliable. A lot of the sources cited seem more like advertisements themselves than reliable articles about this software.
- The "Features" section cites no sources. Additionally, please do not include yourself as the author of the article on the article; nobody on Wikipedia "owns" any articles. Rambley (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Featured article review for J. K. Rowling
editUser:Adam Cuerden has nominated J. K. Rowling for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| For coming up with the idea of Help:Buying Wikipedia. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 06:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC) |
Growth News #34
edit
A quarterly update from the Growth team on our work to improve the new editor experience.
Mentoring new editors
editIn February, Mentorship was successfully rolled out to 100% of newcomers on English Wikipedia. Following this milestone, we collaborated with Spanish Wikipedia to expand Mentorship coverage to 70% of new accounts, with plans to reach 85% soon unless concerns are raised by mentors. (T394867)
“Add a Link” Task – Iteration and Experimentation
editOur efforts to improve and scale the “Add a Link” structured task continued across multiple fronts:
- Community Feedback & Model Improvements: We’ve responded to community concerns with targeted changes:
- Restricting access to newer accounts (T393688)
- Some links types were removed to align with recommendations written in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style (T390683)
- Allowing communities to limit “Add a Link” to newcomers (T393771)
- The model used to suggest the links was improved to ease its training (T388258)
- English Wikipedia rollout and A/B test: We increased the rollout to 20% of newcomers, with analysis underway. Preliminary data suggests this feature makes new account holders more likely to complete an unreverted edit. (T386029, T382603)
- Surfacing Structured Tasks: An experiment where we show “add a link” suggestions to newly registered users while they are reading an article is running on pilot wikis (French, Persian, Indonesian, Portuguese, Egyptian Arabic). Initial results are under analysis. (T386029)
Newcomer Engagement Features
edit- “Get Started” notification: Engineering is in progress for a new notification (Echo/email) to encourage editing among newcomers with zero edits. Early research shows this type of nudge is effective. (T392256)
- Confirmation email: We are exploring ways to simplify and improve the initial account confirmation email newly registered users receive. (T215665)
Community Configuration Enhancements
editCommunities can now manage which namespaces are eligible for Event Registration via Community Configuration. (T385341)
Annual Planning
editThe Wikimedia Foundation’s 2025–2026 Annual Plan is taking shape. The Growth and Editing teams will focus on the Contributor Experiences (WE1) objective, with a focus on increasing constructive edits by editors with fewer than 100 cumulative contributions.
Get Involved
editWe value your insights and ideas! If you would like to participate in a discussion, share feedback, or pilot new features, please reach out on the relevant Phabricator tasks or at our talk page, in any language.
Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Question from Rose jerono on Craig Waters (19:24, 22 June 2025)
editHello --Rose jerono (talk) 19:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Question from KawigglesOfTheKaWiki (03:29, 25 June 2025)
editHi, I'm new to all this. I started maintaining a journal in wiki format, and figured I could also direct some of those efforts toward collective human knowledge. I've begun noticing that many articles use inadequate citations, or, when considering more complex topics, fail to properly explain the ideas as originally presented by primary source authors. Two questions to start off, how necessary is it to learn the Wikipedia markup language, and in what manner should reference and citations be used? Should I have a citation for every sentence, or if ideas are contained across multiple sentences, can I use one citation for all of them? Also, how should one cite a sentence or section which borrows ideas from multiple sources? --KawigglesOfTheKaWiki (talk) 03:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @KawigglesOfTheKaWiki! Glad to have you contributing, and good questions! Regarding the markup language, most experienced editors prefer to use it, since it allows you to do some more advanced tasks, but it definitely isn't necessary to use it to get started! You can just edit using the VisualEditor, which works like a word processor and doesn't require any markup knowledge.
- Regarding citations, the best practice (which you'll find at most featured-quality articles) is to place them so that it's as clear as possible where each piece of information is coming from (see also here). If you're editing a more niche article that doesn't have a lot of citations currently, that might mean adding a paragraph and just putting the citation for it at the end of that paragraph. However, if there's a paragraph with several citations already, I'd put it after every sentence. You can always reuse citations (don't put in the same info twice).
- If a sentence has information from multiple sources, you have two options. You can either place the citations directly after the info being cited from each source, or (if that's not possible because it's the same info, or mixed up rather than one after another) you can just put both at the end of the sentence.
- Hope all that helps, and let me know if you have any other questions! Cheers, Sdkb talk 17:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Nancy Raabe page
editThere are some new proposed edits on the Talk page for Nancy Rabe, thank you DaneCoGuy (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @DaneCoGuy! As I mentioned, I've added a tag to the request, so it will be reviewed by an editor in due time. Appreciate your patience! Cheers, Sdkb talk 17:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
edit | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Sdkb! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy 13th anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2025 (UTC) |  |
- Thanks! Sdkb talk 05:16, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Add links?
editHi, Would you be able to add links to the page Fred Bendheim, and remove the orphan status? Thanks 🙏 Bodhitree3 (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to change it. We encourage you to be bold in updating pages, because wikis like ours develop faster when everybody edits. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. You can always preview your edits before you publish them or test them out in your sandbox. If you need additional help, check out our getting started page or ask the friendly folks at the Teahouse. Sdkb talk 05:17, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello, thank you very much for your support. I just edited an entry on Strigoi to correct the type of source. While information was described as published as a book, it was in fact an article in a magazine. The magazine has a Wikipedia entry, but I do not know how to link the name to the Wikipedia entry. I have provided a primary source (photos of the covers of the magazine, published in 1909) published on a credible website (Australian gutenberg project). --MiDBC (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @MiDBC! My apologies for the delay in replying to you. Thanks for correcting the format of the source! I see you figured out how to link the name of the magazine (you can use
[[link]]code). I've also improved the reference formatting a bit myself. Cheers, Sdkb talk 06:51, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Reporter seeking your insights
editSdkb,
I'm a reporter for The Chronicle of Higher Education. I'm working on a story about Wikipedia's role in the perception of higher ed, and I'm told that you'd be a good person to speak to on the subject considering your work on the Pomona page (and others). Shoot me an email through my page and we can talk more.
Thanks! Theo TheoScheer (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2025
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a talk page discussion, speedy deletion criterion G13 has been amended to remove "Userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text."
- WP:Manual of Style/Superscripts and subscripts was upgraded to a guideline following a RfC discussion.
Miscellaneous
- The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
- Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
Question from Romulus x Remus (00:21, 8 July 2025)
editHi! Thought I’d contribute what I can, I’m a teacher by trade with a bachelors and masters in history. I love the subject, with a focus on ancient Rome, high/late Middle Ages, and the American Civil War.
Going away on vacation in a couple of days, but when I come back I look forward to contributing. --Romulus x Remus (talk) 00:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Romulus x Remus, and welcome! Apologies for the delayed reply, and I hope you had a good vacation. I left a note on your talk page with some info and tips on contributing. Cheers, Sdkb talk 06:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Alumni COI closure
editI'm sure you've already seen it, but nicely done on the closure request. Namelessposter (talk) 13:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Kjeverett79 (00:31, 10 July 2025)
editHello! I am still trying to publish the Christine Huber page. I have updated the footnotes and added citations. It was still denied. Any other things I need to add to it? TIA --Kjeverett79 (talk) 00:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Kjeverett79, and apologies for the delayed reply! The reviewer, CanonNi, suggested you read Help:Referencing for beginners, which will help explain both how to find reliable sources and how to format them better (it looks like you've copied and pasted some identical ones rather than reusing a single reference you define). Having reliable sources is more key for demonstrating notability than having them nicely formatted, but in practical terms good formatting can make the reviewer's job easier. If you have further questions, feel free to ask me, but it might also give you more info to just ask CanonNi directly by mentioning their name (which will send them a ping). Cheers, Sdkb talk 07:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
Question from Nishacoach (05:04, 16 July 2025)
editHello Sdkb, I am glad to have a mentor who can guide and assist me in my journey to editing Wikipedia, following the rules, and in a correct manner. I do have some questions. I am a paid contributor. Some changes and editing are required for the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdard_India page. For example, I need to remove "Ansarullah Tabani" from the founder under the history section, as he was not the founder. He played an important role, but only "Hafiz Abdul Majeed" is the founder of Hamdard Laboratories. Similarly, I am also looking forward to updating/rewriting the History section. But before making any edits, I need your assistance on how I can smoothly update the page. I will be looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you, Nisha. --Nishacoach (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, @Nishacoach! Thanks for engaging here to try to improve the article and for disclosing your paid status. Please review our paid editing policies, one of which is that you should avoid editing the article directly, instead making requests at its talk page via the {{Edit request}} template. Cheers, Sdkb talk 07:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you Sdkb. I want to and will follow the Wikipedia editing policies before making any future edits. I hope my journey here stays smooth and nothing from my end goes wrong. I will keep looking forward to your assistance. Thank you, Nisha. Nishacoach (talk) 18:42, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Luisa Moreno.jpg
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Luisa Moreno.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- (Resolved; see this comment in the GAN.) Sdkb talk 14:43, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
I don't dare AfD it, not sure if that would make the world explode, but can we please get rid of Template:Accessibility editnotice? Unless people actually think that those who benefit from accessibility guidelines hate irony more than most? People read about what interests them; people who benefit from the accessibility guideline do not necessarily read accessibility-related articles all day. And the special editnotice suggests the default isn't already supposed to be inclusive. Also, the editnotice is useless to 99.99% of editors. One needs pretty nerdy skills to be able to make a real difference. Polygnotus (talk) 00:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
- You here? Polygnotus (talk) 13:02, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Polygnotus! Sorry I've been behind on my talk page replies; yes, I'm here! You've made a few different arguments here, but I don't find any of them really persuasive. Going through them:
- That people with accessibility limitations are not more likely than others to read accessibility articles. I don't have evidence for this, but I think common sense would suggest that yes, they are more likely to read these articles.
the special editnotice suggests the default isn't already supposed to be inclusive
. If it does suggest this, the solution would be to tweak the language, not to get rid of it. I don't think it really does suggest this. It's a nod to the reality that focusing 100% on accessibility 100% of the time isn't practical (I'd be hard-pressed to find someone who's included alt text on every single image they've ever added) but that it does matter more some times than others.the editnotice is useless to 99.99% of editors. One needs pretty nerdy skills to be able to make a real difference.
I don't think particularly nerdy skills are needed to e.g. write alt text.
- Hope this helps explain my perspective. Cheers, Sdkb talk 14:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- But how would this editnotice benefit anyone? I can't imagine a scenario in which it is useful. Polygnotus (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- The most basic scenario is that it prompts someone adding an image to an accessibility-related article to add alt text when they otherwise would not have gone to the trouble. Sdkb talk 15:11, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- It might also prompt someone who has developed an interest in accessibility-related articles to discover MOS:Accessibility and start applying its lessons to their work. Sdkb talk 15:13, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Which means they have to read a long text that is 99% irrelevant to them. That page is almost 8000 words! Polygnotus (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
I think common sense would suggest that yes, they are more likely to read these articles.
Common sense is often wrong (e.g. the geocentric model), and what can be asserted without evidence...the solution would be to tweak the language, not to get rid of it.
No, the solution would be to show it on all articles, not just on articles that are vaguely related to accessibilty. Which is proof that it is pointless. If you post a warning everywhere you need to make it part of the interface.write alt text
That is an excellent example of pointless busywork; if a non-nerd does it. A nerd can write a program that shows an image and provides a textbox and a "Next" button. And use AI/filenames/metadata for suggestions. Polygnotus (talk) 15:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)- I know that many other websites do use AI to help write alt text, and that some Wikipedians have strongly opposed it in the past. It might be a topic to look up in the WT:Accessibility archives or raise there again. Cheers, Sdkb talk 15:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- So I should just XfD it? My common sense tells me that the Earth is stationary and that the Sun revolves around it. I can see it with my eyes. Where is the consensus for adding this template to all those pages? Polygnotus (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- To break it down: Readers tend to be more likely to read about topics that are relevant to them. For instance, someone who is visually impaired might want to read the visual impairment article for any number of reasons: potential treatments/cures, understanding the history, understanding the cultural associations, etc. Yes, they'd have personal knowledge of the topic, but not so much personal knowledge that they'd know everything in the article and have no use for it. Readers without visual impairment would not have these reasons for being interested in the article. Given all that, I would be very surprised if visual impairment did not have a higher percentage of visually impaired readers than your average Wikipedia article. Ditto for others. Sdkb talk 15:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- How is that relevant? If visually impaired people are statistically very likely to be interested in dinosaurs (or 70s muscle cars, or Brian Eno), should we add this editnotice to all articles about those topics? How would that help them? A WP:VAGUEWAVE in the direction of a page with 8k words that are a waste of time except for some nerds does not help anyone. You could, for example, have a popup show up when someone uses a header out of order (or adds an image without alt text or whatever), like those recent WMF experiments. That would give people who are actually in that situation the actual information they can actually use. This editnotice is just a bad idea. Polygnotus (talk) 16:00, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- To break it down: Readers tend to be more likely to read about topics that are relevant to them. For instance, someone who is visually impaired might want to read the visual impairment article for any number of reasons: potential treatments/cures, understanding the history, understanding the cultural associations, etc. Yes, they'd have personal knowledge of the topic, but not so much personal knowledge that they'd know everything in the article and have no use for it. Readers without visual impairment would not have these reasons for being interested in the article. Given all that, I would be very surprised if visual impairment did not have a higher percentage of visually impaired readers than your average Wikipedia article. Ditto for others. Sdkb talk 15:52, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- So I should just XfD it? My common sense tells me that the Earth is stationary and that the Sun revolves around it. I can see it with my eyes. Where is the consensus for adding this template to all those pages? Polygnotus (talk) 15:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- I know that many other websites do use AI to help write alt text, and that some Wikipedians have strongly opposed it in the past. It might be a topic to look up in the WT:Accessibility archives or raise there again. Cheers, Sdkb talk 15:29, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- But how would this editnotice benefit anyone? I can't imagine a scenario in which it is useful. Polygnotus (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Polygnotus! Sorry I've been behind on my talk page replies; yes, I'm here! You've made a few different arguments here, but I don't find any of them really persuasive. Going through them:
Question from KINYANJUI.MK (04:17, 29 July 2025)
editHello, how does this editing thing work on wikipedia? --KINYANJUI.MK (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @KINYANJUI.MK. See Help:Introduction for a friendly tutorial. Cheers, Sdkb talk 04:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Request for Patrolling – Kocaeli Health and Technology University
editI hope you’re well. I’m reaching out regarding the article Kocaeli Health and Technology University, which I created under the username Newinwiki8.
The page has been published and indexed by Google for over 1 month and 20 days, but still remains unpatrolled. My account was registered 5 months and 20 days ago, with around 3 months initially spent waiting for indexation.
I’d be grateful if you could kindly review and patrol the article at your convenience. thanks for your time and support. Newinwiki8 (talk) 09:02, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Newinwiki8, it looks like @Cordless Larry has taken a look at the article, so I'll defer to their judgement. I also echo the advice you've been given that removing an ANI post about your actions is not likely to elicit sympathy. Sdkb talk 19:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Williamchan2 (04:51, 5 August 2025)
edit- Williamchan2's mentor Martin Urbanec is away.
Hi Martin, I would like to know what is a semi-protected page and how to know if my account has the privilege to edit that semi-protected page. --Williamchan2 (talk) 04:51, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Williamchan2! Yes, you can edit semi-protected pages because you are autoconfirmed (your account is more than 4 days old and you have made 10 or more edits). Cheers, Sdkb talk 09:23, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2025
editNews and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2025).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, a new speedy deletion criterion, G15, has been enacted. It applies to pages generated by a large language model (LLM) without human review.
- Following a request for comment, there is a new policy outlining the granting of permissions to view the IP addresses of temporary accounts. Temporary account deployment on the English Wikipedia is currently scheduled for September 2025, and editors can request access to the permission ahead of time. Admins are encouraged to keep an eye on the request page; there will likely be a flood of editors requesting the permission when they realize they can no longer see IP addresses.
Technical news
- Administrators can now restrict the "Add a Link" feature to newcomers. The "Add a Link" Structured Task helps new account holders get started with editing. Administrators can configure this setting in the Community Configuration page.
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Indian military history has been closed.
- South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as
All pages related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups.
- The contentious topic designations for Sri Lanka (SL) and India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (IPA) are folded into this new contentious topic.
- The community-authorized general sanctions regarding South Asian social groups (GS/CASTE) are rescinded and folded into this new contentious topic.
- South Asia (WP:CT/SA) is designated a contentious topic. The topic area is specifically defined as
- The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 31 July.
- The arbitration case Transgender healthcare and people has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 11 August.
Miscellaneous
- Wikimania 2025 is happening in Nairobi, Kenya, and online from August 6 to August 9. This year marks 20 years of Wikimania. Interested users can join the online event. Registration for the virtual event is free and will remain open throughout Wikimania. You can register here now.
Hi SKD,
My article "Dinesh Victor" has been nominated for deletion. Could you please help me improve it so it meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines?
I’m looking for advice on:
What reliable sources should I add? How to make sure the article is neutral and well-cited. How to respond in the deletion discussion. --Jhon025 (talk) 09:45, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Jhon025! The page Help:My article got nominated for deletion! I hope will have some useful advice. Cheers, Sdkb talk 13:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Request for help creating an iceDQ Wikipedia page
editHello Sdkb,
I hope you are doing well. I noticed your edits on Wikipedia and wanted to ask if you might be open to helping create a page for a company called iceDQ, which works in the data validation.
I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines for neutrality, verifiability, and notability, and I’m happy to provide reliable, independent sources for the content.
If you’re interested, I can share more details and references so the article can be built in line with Wikipedia’s standards.
Thank you,
iceDQ Team Icedq (talk) 13:33, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked by Writ Keeper. Sdkb talk 14:08, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello mentor. My paper "A College Algebra Proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTA)" has been declined for publication by Amer. Math. Monthly, Math Magazine, College Math Journal, PRIMUS, and AMS Open Math Note. I can probably get my paper accepted by J. Math & Stat. Science without editing. My paper is a manuscript for William Kingdon Clifford's abstract (1870) of a proof of the FTA. Clifford's proof is not cited or discussed in Wikipedia FTA. My paper explains and lifts Clifford's elementary (i.e. undergraduate) proof from obscurity. You can access my paper at URL: sections.maa.org/okar/papers/2025/indexa.html. Franklin Kemp --LFKMP (talk) 21:33, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- @LFKMP, do you have a question about editing Wikipedia? Sdkb talk 14:47, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Gannetcelluloid999 (14:08, 18 August 2025)
editHello! We want to create a wiki page for our movie. Need your kind help with this. --Gannetcelluloid999 (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Gannetcelluloid999, see Help:Your first article, and kindly note that you have a conflict of interest for your own movie. Sdkb talk 14:46, 18 August 2025 (UTC)
Question from Ousman bangura on John W. Colloton (23:07, 19 August 2025)
editHello, how can I know how to edit --Ousman bangura (talk) 23:07, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Ousman bangura! See Help:Introduction. Cheers, Sdkb talk 23:20, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I just learned of the death of Robert Resnik, a long time Vermont folk musician, radio host, and contemporary of Pete Sutherland. I had started a draft back in 2021. Wish I had gotten it into mainspace then. Thought you might be interested! Best, Thriley (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sad to hear the news. I took a glance at Resnik's article and fixed up a few things. Sdkb talk 05:15, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
edit| September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
I'm supposed to do the wiki training, and I can't find where that is. Can you help me? --Nateiac7 (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Nateiac7! There's a response to your question at the help desk here, and the main tutorial is here. If you're part of a student program or something, you should ask your instructor, since sometimes there are specialized tutorials for those situations. Cheers, Sdkb talk 01:05, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Nateiac7 (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2025 (UTC)