Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20ID (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g4, repost, not significantly different from first version. NawlinWiki 15:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

20ID (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fails WP:ATT only other sources I could find were sponsor press pages and article cites no sources. Non-notable. Notability attempts to be established by showing a bucket load of online league wins but no "pro" wins. BJ^Talk 09:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The first AfD can be seen here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20ID. BJ^Talk 09:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. BJ^Talk 09:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm puzzled. I can see the article was taken to AfD and decision was to delete. Why is it back? --Dweller 12:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • An editor created afresh a different article, on the same subject by the same name. Uncle G 15:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • For re-created material like that you can just tag with {{db-repost}} to have it speedy deleted. Koweja 15:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if not speedy delete. Koweja 15:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.