Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coco Solid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coco solid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Queried speedy delete. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —--Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord² 10:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Article creator, likely unfamiliar with WP practice, has provided a slew of references at Talk:Coco solid. LessHeard vanU (talk) 10:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:BAND - multiple independent reviews are cited. Some information about chart positions (I assume she's sold a record or two, if the reviews are to be believed) would help, but the notability of the subject is established. Tevildo (talk) 11:29, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notability not an issue given the large number of reviews. Article quality will improve eventually; WP:Deadline. -moritheil^Talk 22:30, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, seems to meet WP:NMG, but move to Coco Solid. Stifle (talk) 11:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Made some slight grammar/punctuation/spelling/wording improvements as part of ARS. Magnetic Rag (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, more of the same and I boldly moved page and AfD. -- Banjeboi 20:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.