Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destructoid (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 September 1.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (hot!) 21:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Destructoid

In January, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destructoid voted to "keep and clean up". We kept it, it has not been cleaned up. Self-referenced, spammy and has always been that way. Guy (Help!) 22:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Destruct, per nomination; 82 Google hits [1] for a video game blog is not a good omen. Results include Technorati, StumbleUpon, Flickr, and sites that aren't reliable sources. 1 passing mention on Factiva which basically tells us it exists, but nothing more. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-25 23:38Z
Delete as above. Metamagician3000 09:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of non-trivial coverage of subject by reliable, third-party sources. -- Satori Son 20:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.