Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 30

< Wikipedia:Categories for deletion | Log
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2006 April 30)
< April 29 May 1 >

April 30

edit

Category:Muslim

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 13:34, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with Category:Muslims or Category:Muslim Wikipedians. Only contains two userpages which also are in Category:Muslim Wikipedians. TimBentley (talk) 00:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ethnicity categories

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was deleted already. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Finnish-Swedish people
edit
Category:Australian-Brazilians
edit
Category:Serbian Germans
edit
Category:Jewish-Frenches
edit
Category:Italian-Irishes
edit

All five above cats are the work of User:Jcaragonv who appears to be on a mission to create empty and/or misnamed "ethnicity" cats of every conceivable combination - see several other entries from the last few days. I have only nominated those that are empty or those that are named in something that is not quite English to minimise debates about usefulness, but if this proposal is successful I am minded to list some more which have only one or two articles and are wilfully obscure. Valiantis 23:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a further two cats to the top of the list which are not only empty but also orphaned. Valiantis 23:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Cincinnati RailRaiders

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category for a hockey team that never skated...See Cincinnati Mighty Ducks for background. ccwaters 23:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Contemporary christian radio stations to Category:Christian radio stations

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:35, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The broader classification will allow for a greater range of styles to be represented. Dan, the CowMan 22:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Simulation computer games to Category:Simulation computer and video games

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 13:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change to match other CVG categories. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 22:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Kurdish provinces

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge with Category:Kurdistan. 4 Merge votes, 6 delete votes, 1 keep. Merge chosen because in terms of creation and deletion of categories (i.e. actual admin intervention) there is no difference. The only practical difference is the items currently in Kurdish provinces will be in Kurdistan category. Anyone may remove any articles from that category afterwards if they disagree with them being there. Tim! 16:50, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia is not a soapbox or a battleground. Hattusili 20:39, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also it is not right to call the cities in turkey where people from variable ethnicities live as Kurdish cities.--Hattusili 20:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


If I get it right, the entire process of tagging various localities&regions under Category: Kurdish provinces and Category: Kurdish cities had been initiated by a possible sockpuppet. [1] --Cretanforever 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to Category:Kurdistan. Clearly some or all of the provinces do fall into the remit of that somewhat nebulous cat which recently survived a delete vote IIRC. Some of these provinces are already listed in Category:Kurdistan. Listing provinces from four different countries in the same cat is misleading as provinces will be defined differently in each country. Valiantis 22:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The only option possible is an article with a list, in the same vein as List of U.S. cities with Hispanic majority populations, which can then be discussed in the frame of that article/list. Otherwise it would pave the way for loose and wild categories such as Category:Hispanic cities. Delete Category:Kurdish cities as well! --Cretanforever 16:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I don´t seem any wrong with the Categeory:Kurdish cities and Category:Kurdish provinces. You can´t take the Us-hispanic as an exemple and compare it with the Kurdish one, that´s crazy. OtrO DiAOtrO DiA 00:10, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Why not? Hispanics are an ethnic minority too. Whats so special about Kurds that makes them "better" from Hispanics? --Cat out 11:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Delete per my nomination.Delete Category:Kurdish cities as well! --Hattusili 11:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Valiantis. "Kurdish provinces" doesn't have a clear meaning (presumably it means administrative provinces in a range of countries that are in some broad sense identifiable as Kurdish in culture, language, or politics?) but this is the sort of thing that is better listified and well-referenced. Cretanforever is very close to the mark with "Hispanic cities" - there may be no mainstream Hispanic-independence movement but it is still a near exact analogy (whether or not there is a Fooian independence movement shouldn't change whether "Fooian cities/province etc" is a meaningful category), so I don't see what's crazy about it. A better analogy would be "Tutsi villages" which can be found in many countries in Africa; again, that would be better listified since it would be then possible to see exactly why the village is being described that way (e.g. by % of population, or historical links) and what the sources behind the claim are. The same would apply here - it would be possible make a "List of provinces that have been described as Kurdish" or "List of province with a Kurdish majority population" or "List of historically Kurdish provinces" and make them well-referenced and NPOV. I'm not convinced that the same can be done with this category. I would be happy to get rid of the Kurdish cities category too, but it needs to be nominated before anyone can vote on it! TheGrappler 00:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The category is used to mark provinces of todays Turkey, Iraq, Iran etc. So "historic" isnt the case. Also we have no census data establishing how many kurds are, let alone establish where they have a "majority population". Exactly who determines which city is kurdish and which one isnt? Also, we do not tag provinces based on ethnicity anywhere. --Cat out 11:07, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I nominated Category: Kurdish cities for deletion as well. Also, see remark on top --Cretanforever 08:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per Valiantis. Lapaz 02:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Please join the discussion of Kurdish categorization at Category talk:Kurdistan (and Talk:Batman, Turkey) --Moby 09:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well there are already on-going discussions about the whole issue, including the possibility of sub cats. This discussion is about a specific CFD. (speaking of which, could you please finish the process you started here) --Moby 09:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Ancient Greek sites

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename all - TexasAndroid 14:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These set of categories has hardly got going, but it does have potential as there are Ancient Greek sites in 10+ modern countries. However, they need clearer names:

also

Carlossuarez46 18:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Black Mexicans to Category:Afro-Mexicans

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename Tim! 17:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename The term Afro-Mexican is more commonly used to refer to Mexicans with African ancestry. Some find the term "Black Mexican" offensive. --- Lancini87 20:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:... Pokémon

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Tim! 17:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what this category is for, but it contains only one article from user space. Conscious 18:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:High School

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Tim! 17:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Completely redundant to Category:High schools. Rory096 17:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Peace campaigners to Category:Anti-war activists

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge - TexasAndroid 14:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Only three articles. Merge into the much larger category. Bhoeble 16:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment This further demonstrates the inadequacy of Category:Anti-war activists as the three people in this group are Elizabeth Dilling, an American anti-semite opposed to US involvement in WW2, Ivan Supek, a Croatian physicist who campaigned against nuclear weapons (who apparently fought against the wartime Croatian fascist government), and Gordon Wilson who spoke out against both Republican and Loyalist violence in Northern Ireland, which the majority of people would not, I suspect, describe as a war. Valiantis 23:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Valleys on Mars to Category:Valleys and canyons on Mars

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was rename Tim! 16:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's been some movement in Mars cat names recently and this seems a sensible change as well. Mars nomenclature includes "valles" and "chasma(ta)". They naturally overlap and the category should include both. Marskell 15:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Bahamas Democratic Movement

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was relisted on May 4 Tim! 16:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article incorrectly created as a category. A similar article exists with the correct title Bahamas Democratic Movement. Delete Valentinian (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge Tim! 17:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly created Category:Nature-related lists when I really meant to elevate Category:Nature lists to be directly under Category:Lists (partly because Category:Nature isn't under anything but Category:Fundamental). But since the list should be of the form x-related lists anyway, this might as well be a merge. JeffW 04:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Triumphal arches

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Rename/Merge/Delete as nominated. - TexasAndroid 14:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These categories don't follow Wikipedia's usual style, and I see no value in trying to decide which of them are "modern".

I done a lot of category work, but I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like this muddle before! CalJW 04:03, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

Category:Visitor attactions in Belgium

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - TexasAndroid 14:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Typo. See category:Visitor attractions in Belgium Delete. CalJW 03:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]

  • Delete....but I say that with a slightly heavy heart - only because I think I really like the idea of "attactions" as a word. :) ExRat 21:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Attaction, n. v.
1. n. (as elision of "at action") First used to describe the state of active editors on Wikipedia (q.v.); now used generally as a synonym for "active", "in action", etc.
2. n. v. The state of being attracted to something as if tacked to it; often used with overtones of being addicted (e.g. "I'm still attacted to Wikipedia" or "He never overcame his Wikipedia attaction").
Etymologically, David Kernow 13:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_April_30&oldid=1110773135"