Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

(Redirected from Wikipedia:Flc)

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria.

Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.

The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:

  • actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or
  • consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or
  • reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met.

It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting.

Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Shortcut

Featured content:

Featured list tools:

Nomination procedure
  1. Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions.
  2. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list.
  3. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance.
  4. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page.
  5. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary.
Reviewing procedure

Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

  • To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page).
  • To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote.
  • To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it.
  • If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page.
  • Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time.
  • To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.
Nominations urgently needing reviews

The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so:

Source reviews needed

The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

edit

List of World Heritage Sites in Palestine

edit
Nominator(s): User:Gerald Waldo Luis

Another World Heritage Site list which will (hopefully) become a Featured List. Palestine has five Sites that are already inscribed, with 13 on the tentative list. The list follows the typical World Heritage Site list structure, modeled specifically after the Egypt list. Due to Palestine's unique relationship with UNESCO, due to the Arab-Israeli conflict, Gerald Waldo Luis has included two paragraphs in the lead to address those. Therefore, this also includes some secondary coverage, mostly in the last paragraph of the lead. As Gerald has done most of the work, but has not been active for some time, I have decided to nominate it for him. I look forward to addressing your comments, thank you. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

edit

List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines

edit
Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because the article is fully sourced and contains everything needed in this list. The lead, although short, describes most of the article. I did all of the things stated in the last archive (as I remember). If the lead is too short, the history section also describes the tables well. In conclusion, it meets the criteria. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
  • In addition to bolding a name (in "Multi-medalists") you'll also have to use a symbol. * The history section has a MOS:SANDWICH issue.
  • You'll need to use the upright param for the images instead of a size (MOS:UPRIGHT).
  • The flag in the infobox does not have alt text. (please   mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @MPGuy2824: Did the column scopes and row scopes for three of the tables. Is it correct? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Mostly yes, but with 2 issues:
Do clarify in the first paragraph whether you've completed all the suggestions provided in the previous nomination of this list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment from Bgsu98

edit

MOS:SANDWICH does not bother me in this particular situation. In fact, it really can't be avoided. The image is vertical and the infobox is vertical, so it is not really a problem. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 1997

edit
Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my 37th nomination in this series. In this particular year, the best-selling British single of all time was released. One of its two sides topped the AC chart in the United States, but interestingly it wasn't the side that generated all those sales. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Bgsu98

edit

I'm genuinely surprised "Candle in the Wind" wasn't the higher-performing of that single. It seemed like it was on the radio all the time.

I have no complaints or suggestions about the prose. It's good, with appropriate wikilinks. After 36 prior FLs in this series, you probably have it down by now. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:10, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alavense

edit
  • I don't want to be annoying with this, but I think the 1996 chart could be linked.
  • You have (pictured in 2009) for the first picture, but not for the rest.
  • I also think it would be nice to have consistency for the image captions, so I would go with eleven consecutive weeks, so that it is consistent with spent a total of three weeks.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:37, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alavense: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Nice work. Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 08:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly

edit
Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back after a few months with the 7th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead and history sections, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Telangana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
  • Source 1 only verifies the 2023 part, not the "3 December" part. Please change it to verify all of this
    • ✓ The specific date wasn't important, so I've left only the year. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • Infoboxes should ideally be used for things already mentioned in the text, so they usually do not need citations. "First past the post" and "December 2028" are not mentioned in the article, so they need citations. Also, could you add "current legislature" to 16th Rajasthan Assembly as it changes
    • Could you elaborate on the last sentence please? There is no "current_legislature" param in the {{Infobox legislature}} template. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
      • I see, then you can just ignore
    • ✓ I've removed the specific date for the last election and removed the tenative date of the next election since it was speculative (counted as last election +term limit). -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • Source 2 verifies the sentence directly preceding it, and the second instance, but not "the unicameral state legislature" or that the seat is in Jaipur.
  • Source 3 is good, I wonder if you should use Template:Cite map?
  • Source 4 is good
  • Source 5 will not load for me yet, is it dead? but you put "pp. 6, 12." while others u just put a colon and the page number. For sake of consistency, you should stick with either one of these styles
  • I will check the other sources later, but 6 has the same concern as 5 with the page numbers
    • ✓ Those sources aren't dead, but probably geo-restricted. I've replaced one of them with a ref that seemed to have been archived before the restriction came into place. I've used the page number next to the citation in all 3 places now. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • File:Rajasthan Assembly.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:IN-RJ.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Wahlkreise zur Vidhan Sabha von Rajasthan.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • Please change alt texts to the last map (3rd image) to align with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#Maps and diagrams I think first map is okay but if you want to specify northwest india then its up to you
    • I've added north-west to the first map image. I'm not that good at writing alt-text so this might be a good opportunity to learn for me: I read MOS:ALTMAP, but since the current alt-text for the 2nd map is "Map showing the constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly", I'm not sure what to do. The best I can come up with is "Rajasthan's ST seats are concentrated in its south and the east, while the SC seats are quite dispersed". Is that good enough? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes it is good enough 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:09, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. The rest were done before. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are large white spaces created on my monitor from the images in both the "Constituencies" and "History" sections, not sure what can be done about this
    • ✓ I have reduced the size of the locator map. Rajasthan is the largest state in India and its ___location is still visible. Hopefully that fixes/reduces the issue. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
      • pass image review
  • The prose itself is quite clear

Thanks, if you ever nominate future lists similar to them, I'll review 'em. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara: I've done a lot of these and have a couple of questions for you (inline). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please apply this advice here to the Telangana list as well
  • citation nine still has page numbers inside the citation and not next to it.
  • sources 12, 13, 15-17, 19-25, 26-28 are georestricted and thus I can not review them. I would assume good faith as this list has not showed errors and the sources themselves verify very minor things
  • 11, 14, 18 passes, just verifies existence
  • 10 pass both uses
  • Please add a source to verify that Jaipur is the capital of the state, it might be a case of WP:SKYBLUE, but I find the refutations to that essay to be convincing.
  • Source review pass, support

Comments

edit

List of Singapore LRT stations

edit
Nominator(s): Icepinner 06:38, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My first FLC! As the name suggests, this is a list of Singapore LRT stations. After a peer review and spending how many hours on this article, I think it's ready for the gauntlet. A thing to note: the LRT system in Singapore isn't technically an actual LRT. It's more of a people mover or an automated guideway transit system. Any comments are appreciated. Icepinner 06:38, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
    • I believe I have carried out your suggestions for the table scopes
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. (please   mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A couple of points, in addition:
    • Consider using {{Legend}} instead of the table that you have.
  • Done. I couldn't figure out how to add images in the boxes of the template, so I hope it's fine the way it is
  • Since you are using images for "Bus interchange" and "Civil Defence Shelter", you'll have to make sure that each use in the legend section as well as the table has alt text. Alternatively, you can use text symbols for each of them. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added alt text for the bus pictogram. I got rid of the Civil Defence Shelter icon since technically the MRT part of Bukit Panjang is considered to be the Civil Defence Shelter, not the LRT part.
  • @MPGuy2824: I have carried out all your suggestions I believe, please read my comments. Thanks for the accessiblity review! Icepinner 11:22, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was able to move the bus pictogram into the legend template.
    • row and col scopes: it wasn't correct done. I've fixed the "closed station" table with explanatory edit summaries. Do go through those and fix the "in operation" table in the same way.
      • Ah, apologies. They were defined as rowspan so that's why I got mixed up. I believe I fixed it, could you kindly check if I did it correctly?
    • "Choa Chu Kang Bus Interchange" is mentioned in small, but the rest of the interchanges are in the normal size. Keep them all consistent.
      • I was wondering why it was so small. Fixed it.
    • I suggest that you leave out the wikilinks for the various languages in the column headers. Also "English • Malay" looks weird to me. Maybe change it to "English/Malay". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • Done
  • @MPGuy2824: I've responded to your second round of comments. Icepinner 09:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Support on table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:29, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Appreciate it!   Icepinner 10:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
  • "Interior of Ten Mile Junction station." This is not a full sentence, should not have a period. On the same image, it mentions information from 2019, do we have any updates on that?
    • Changed it to a full sentence. Concerning your query on any new information since its closure, not really, possibly for several reasons:
  1. The LRT system doesn't receive a lot of coverage
  2. The LTA is really hesitant to give away information
  3. Ten Mile Junction was a really small station
I, along with other people in Singapore, know for a fact that it was converted into a depot, but there aren't any reliable sources that explicitly say "Ten Mile Junction station was converted to Ten Mile Junction Depot". There are articles detailing how the conversion was actioned, though these come from self-published websites ran by rail enthusiasts and would thus be unacceptable as sources.
  • add dmy dates template, and singapore english template
    • It's already there?
      • My apologies, could you move it so it fits with MOS:ORDER
        • Done. Thought you were referring to the Engvar template on the talk page, but I've added it to the article.
  • "the Sengkang and Punggol LRT lines (SPLRT), operated by SBS Transit,[5] serves" serves should be changed to serve for subject verb agreement
    • Done
  • "were conceptualised in 1991 in anticipation " add comma between 1991 and in
    • Done
  • "operations on 29 January 2005 with the exception " comma between 2005 and with for both instances
    • Done
  • "with Nibong" add "the" inbetween?
    • There's no clear consensus on this. A similar issue was raised by another editor in one of my GANs a while ago and I talk to some editors off-Wiki. ZKang123 does add a "the" before the station's name, though I don't.
  • "announced to close from 13 January 2019 " the from should be changed to "on"
    • Not done. This would imply that Ten Mile Junction closed for one day
  • "For the BPLRT, it starts " You can reword this to "The BPLRT starts" to make it more concise
    • Done
  • In the "closed stations" section, it does not mention Ten Mile Junction having any connections, so this parameter can be removed as it is the only item in the table
    • I also thought about that, but I was wondering if there were any points on the FLC criteria regarding consistency with table structures. Either way, removed.
  • "both have a loop on its" change its to their. Either remove both or put a comma before and after it.
    • Done, I believe
  • more comment to come

@Easternsahara: I've carried out your first round of comments. Icepinner 09:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Link first instance of terminus to Terminal train station
    • Done, unless you want me to link it at starts from Choa Chu Kang?
  • Per MOS:NUMNOTES, you shouldn't begin a sentence with a figure but numbers that are comparable should be in the same format should you should reword "3 stations are planned to interchange with upcoming MRT lines, being Choa Chu Kang with the Jurong Region line and Punggol and Riviera with the Cross Island line."
    • Done

I will preemptively support as I believe you will address my concerns.

@Easternsahara: addressed your concerns. Appreciate the preemptive support! :) Icepinner 14:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit

List of municipalities in Málaga

edit
Nominator(s): Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC) and Mattximus (talk)[reply]

Mattximus and I are working on bringing up the lists of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in other similar featured lists. Our two previous nominations have already garnered some support, so I am nominating another one. This is the 12th nomination in the series and the list has therefore benefited from the improvements suggested by reviewers in the previous eleven. Formatting is also similar to the others. In any case, all comments and suggestions are welcome and will be acted upon in a timely manner. Thanks in advance for all the comments! Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

edit

Here'll be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Malaga in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Málaga 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Vista de Málaga desde el castillo de Gibralfaro, España, 2023-05-20, DD 113.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Captivating Views of Old Town Marbella.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Mijas 05.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Castillo de Vélez-Málaga.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Fuengirola Puerto 02.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Estepona aerial.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • Alt-text and captions are proper.
    • Can say that image review shall be passed.
Thanks for taking the time to review the list, Arconning. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Abia State

edit
Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Abia from when the region was called Eastern then split into East Central and two other states, then East Central was split into Anambra and Imo states, then Abia carved out of Imo. I have made significant improvements on this, and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

edit

Reading Beans

edit

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Pass.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Add |first=Chuma |last=Uwechia to Ref13
  • Wikilink John Darnton in Ref14.
  • Wikilink University of California Press in Ref15.
  • Remove the (Nigeria) in Ref20
  • Add |first=Emmanuel |last=Oladesu to Ref25
  • Add |first=Emmanuel|last=Ugwu to Ref39
  • Add |date=5 December 2019 to Ref41
  • Add |first=Charles|last=Ajunwa to Ref42
  • Add |date=9 June 2024 to Ref43
  • Add |date=19 May 2023 to Ref44
  • Add |first=Peter|last=Uzoho to Ref69
  • Add |date=13 May 2024 to Ref70
  • This is optional: Adding Agency Reporter i.e News Agency of Nigeria to the author parameter for Ref72. Generally, I would advise you replace every source with no attributed writer to a source that has a byline. For informations such as the one in Ref71 and Ref72, is easy to get a source with a byline. Let me know what you think.

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:23, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Done, thank you! Channels and Punch reporting an election winner in their capacities as national mediums is reliable enough for me, hence, why I cited them. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Pass. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans Thank you so much for taking your time!!! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tyla discography

edit
Nominator(s): dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

South African singer-songwriter Tyla's discography includes one studio album and two EPs. Her self-titled debut album features the singles "Water" which peaked at number 7 on the US Billboard Hot 100 and won the inaugural Grammy Award for Best African Music Performance, as well as other singles such as "Jump" and "Push 2 Start", among others.

This will mark my fifth nom, I guess. dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

edit

76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

edit
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 2024 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys for featured list promotion because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how RunningTiger123 formatted the 2007, 2020, 2021, and 2022 ceremonies for this edition. Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @RunningTiger123: Done - I marked up the area awards based on this list of winners, and I cleaned up the grammar in the category changes section to past tense. I based the grammar on similar sections in similar FL-quality Creative Arts Emmys lists. Hopefully, these changes satisfy your comments.
--Birdienest81talk 08:17, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Master System games

edit
Nominator(s): NaccMan (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This list was initially a complete mess, until I stepped in to fix it all up and now I don't think you can find a better Master System list anywhere. I have been working so hard finding sources and honestly I think this at least deserves some kind of featured status like the other Sega lists. If there is anything that needs improving let me know so this can be a featured list. NaccMan (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • Nothing in the lead is sourced
  • "The Master System which was renamed with a redesigned casing from the original Sega Mark III, which had been released in the Japanese market in 1985—is a video game console released by Sega in the North American market in September 1986 to compete with the Nintendo Entertainment System, which had been released in the same market in February 1986 (an earlier test market for NES in New York occurred in October 1985)." - good heavens that sentence is long and hard to follow. I would suggest "The Master System is a video game console released by Sega in the North American market in September 1986 to compete with the Nintendo Entertainment System, which had been released in the same market in February 1986, although an earlier test market for NES in New York had occurred in October 1985. The Master System was renamed and redesigned from the original Sega Mark III, which had been released in the Japanese market in 1985."
  • "Originally priced at US$200, North American distribution rights for the console...." - the rights weren't priced at $200 (I assume). I'd suggest separating the price info into a different sentence
  • " before Sega re-acquired the rights themselves and released a further streamlined redesign of the console during the launch of the Sega Genesis" - when was that?
  • A lot of the release date cells are completely blank. If the date is unknown, I would suggest putting something in to that effect so it doesn't look like you have forgotten to fill in the info
    • This is mainly for Brazilian releases where if a game was unreleased I mark it as unreleased BUT if it was released I put it as blank due to me not finding when it was released. If there is any ideas what to do let me know maybe we could put some sort of symbol or generic footnote for "Date Unknowns", because it wont require a reference since if the info doesnt exist it doesnt exist. NaccMan (talk) 04:32, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Linking of publishers/developers is very random. Why is Sega linked in the publisher column on rows 2 and 5 but not row 3? As the table is sortable it should really be linked on every row.
    • Reason why is because if a game is developed by Sega and also the same game happens to be published by Sega we dont have to link it twice. It is to avoid duplicate links in rows I believe. NaccMan (talk) 05:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing in the second table is sourced apart from one release date
  • The notes column of the second table should not be grouped under the release date header
  • Also, none of the entries in that column are complete sentences thus they should not have full stops
  • Same goes for most of the footnotes
  • Most of the footnotes are not sourced
  • "Three years later after the initial Brazilian release" => "Three years after the initial Brazilian release". This applied to several other notes as well.
  • "Four years later after the initial Brazilian release it was rereleased in Brazil as: Geraldinho." - there is no need for that comma after the word "as". This applies to several other notes as well.
  • Quite a bit to fix here, I fear, especially with regard to sourcing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:53, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates of the 2025 Australian federal election

edit
Nominator(s): GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it to be an interesting topic of a recently-concluded and (in my opinion) interesting election. GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

I will get a review in soon, History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you @MPGuy2824, I believe I have completed those changes. GraziePrego (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bolding of text wouldn't be read by a screen reader. You'll have to mark incumbency (sitting members) and wins with different symbols.
    • rowscopes are needed for the "Summary by party" and "Disendorsements and resignations" tables too.
    • I wasn't a fan of the raw html in the Senate tables, so I tried replacing it in one of the cells with a template. Feel free to revert if you don't like it or it doesn't work for some reason.
    • The tables in the "Senate" section aren't standard tables (e.g. in the ACT subsection there, the first column isn't for "Sustainable Australia" only). I don't know how to overcome this (without changing the table structure), but maybe PresN might have a suggestion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Incumbency and wins are now marked with symbols, will do other changes. GraziePrego (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Rowscopes done and I'm fine with your template in the Senate tables :) I'll wait a little bit to see if PresN has a suggestion about how to change the Senate tables that have been done in a slightly unusual way :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Rowscopes done You still need to do it for the "Summary by party" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Done, thank you GraziePrego (talk) 02:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      The problem here is that the information isn't really a table (the columns have nothing to do with every row), you're just sticking boxes next to each other so that it doesn't take up a million rows in one skinny table. There's a way to indicate that it isn't a "data" table but a "presentation" table - (MOS:LTAB). I converted one table as an example. You add role=presentation to the table, drop the caption, change all '!' to '|', and since that killed the styling of the party cells I added in some. Just do the same for the rest of the Senate tables and I think you're good. --PresN 12:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Done, thank you for showing me that example one :) GraziePrego (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Bauchi State

edit
Nominator(s): Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating List of governors of Bauchi State for Featured List status. The article presents a comprehensive chronological record of all military and civilian governors of the state from its creation in 1976 to the present. It is well-structured in a clear tabular format, supported by reliable references, and remains stable without rapid changes or disputes. The list meets the Featured List criteria of being comprehensive, well-written, verifiable, and stable, and I believe it merits recognition as a Featured List. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans

edit

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Passed.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

I’ll get this done before 24-48-hours. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:58, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Infobox says that the Governor can be addressed as “The Honourable”. I am not really into politics but isn’t this title reserved for members of the legislative body? I would encourage you to cite informations in the Infobox. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans Thank you very much for your review. I have fixed it, kindly have a look now.Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of unsourced information here and it’s making it hard to review (for me). I advise @Ibjaja055 to go through the article and fix the sourcing issues so that the body supports the lede. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans I have fixed the issue with the use of proper in-line citations and I have also either removed or replaced some marginally reliable reliable references. Can you check again? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There’s no page number in Ref2. Also wikilink Cambridge University Press. Also, since it’s a book change the date to |year=2019
  • Add |8 June 2023|newspaper=Premium Times to Ref3.
  • Change the newspaper parameter on Ref4 to |newspaper=The Guardian
  • Wikilink African Economic History in Ref5
  • You need to clarify that Ref6 is dissertation (see WP:THESIS). Use {{Cite thesis}}.
  • Add |year=2020 to Ref7.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in Ref8 to |newspaper=Business Day
  • I don’t know the reliability of Neptune Prime. Can you shed some light on it or better still, replace it?
  • Wikilink The New York Times in Ref10.
  • Wikilink Channels Television in Ref11.
  • Wikilink TheCable in Ref12.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in |newspaper=Blueprint in Ref13 and Ref14.
  • Ref15: the newspaper’s name is in the title. Seperate them and add |newspaper=Daily Trust to the cite template.
  • Add a date to Ref16 and change the newspaper parameter to |newspaper=Premium Times
  • Wikilink TheCable in Ref17.
  • Remove the |___location= in Ref18.
  • Remove the author parameter in Ref19 and use |website=Ecoi.net in the website parameter.
  • Use |newspaper=Vanguard in Ref21&22.
  • Change the newspaper parameter to Premium Times in Ref33&34.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in Ref35 to ThisDay.

This is all for now before I move to the next. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I have duly effected all the corrections. Thank you for the review. Can you take a look now? Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed the remaining issues. I’ll do the spot checks later tonight. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:51, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ibjaja055, I couldn’t do the spotchecks as promised due to real life issues. From my spotchecks, only Ref1 failed verification. It made no mention of the Government House, being the residence of the governor. I believe there are sources out there that can verify this. Another suggestion; the first Northern Region section dived into a lot of federal politics that does not belong to this list. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans I have fixed your recommendation and I have also removed the failed source along with the claim. Can you check again now? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs written by Louis Tomlinson

edit
Nominator(s): jolielover♥talk 06:43, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because it meets all the FL criteria. It is well-sourced throughout with reliable sources, it is stable and not subject to major changes or edit warring, the lead is substantial and comprehensive, and the list comprehensively covers all songs written by Tomlinson. The table has appropriate captioning and the image is high-quality, illustrates the article's subject, and has alt text and caption. All links are archived. First FLC. jolielover♥talk 06:43, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elias

edit

Welcome to FLC! I'd be happy to read through the page. Give me a few days to comment. Elias 🦗🐜 [Chat, they chattin', they chat] 10:29, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it took eight days lol I was tired and they found mold growing in our house vents... guess black mold can really affect your brain hahaha! Anyway, incredibly niche fandom jokes aside, here are my comments
  • Lots of "tracks" or "co-written by Tomlinson/him" and "peaked at X on the UK singles chart" "credits on X tracks". We can vary the diction a little or trim a couple of words.
    • Try reducing or rewording the amount of "co-wrote XYZ song" phrases here. Since the reader already knows the songs being discussed are co-written by Tomlinson, many of these phrases should be removed. For example, in the "Midnight Memories" sentence, you can merge the sentences about the standard edition tracks and bonus tracks (e.g. "co-writing 9 tracks out of 14 on the standard edition and 3 out of 4 on the deluxe edition.")
  • A better way to introduce the list article would be to mention the number of Tomlinson's writing credits and the number of top-10 songs he's co-written. So in other words something like "Tomlinson has writing credits on over 90 songs, seven of which have appeared in the top 10..."
  • There are unreleased songs included on the table, but there is no mention of unreleased music in the lead. Compare with the most recent song FL I know of List of songs recorded by SZA. Are there any sources that significantly cover the unreleased music in particular? How many outtakes there are, why they were scrapped, if they have been leaked, how many were leaked, what Tomlinson thinks about them, etc.
  • "Tomlinson took a more active writing role" what does this mean? Is the suggested meaning here that he did not write as many songs in the first two 1D albums? If so, say that outright (with the proper sourcing ofc)
  • "for the band's album" we still haven't gotten to the part where 1D split up so I don't think this is necessary
  • For this second paragraph, I think it makes sense to follow chronology. "Steal My Girl" is the lead single for Four (and charted higher than both "No Control" and "Night Changes"), so to me it's better to mention that song first.
  • "It was picked as it was a song" sounds a bit clunky... maybe it's the passive voice, maybe it's the choice of conjunction. Perhaps "Fans started the campaign because Tomlinson was a primary writer alongside band member Liam Payne..." ?
  • "Night Changes" is introduced in an awkward way here. From reading some of the sources, it seems like it's there so that the article can mention it reached a new chart peak following Payne's death? If my assumption is correct, I believe this information can be delivered in a more straightforward manner. Note that the page is about Tomlinson's work so keep the sentences more or less Tomlinson-centric.
    • Something like "After Payne's death in 2024, many of the songs Tomlinson co-wrote for the band experienced a surge in streams; Four's second single, 'Night Changes', reached a new peak of number 6 [...]"
  • "For his debut studio album, Tomlinson has songwriting credits on all tracks. He also has songwriting credits on all tracks of his second studio album" You could shorten this to "Tomlinson has songwriting credits on all tracks from Walls and Faith in the Future". It avoids repetition
  • I don't think it matters that Faith in the Future debuted at number one in the UK. Remember that this is a list about songs
  • Is Aniftos's quote here worthy of being mentioned? This is just the opinion of one author. Delivering such a message is a good way to close the lead though, so if you can find other journalists saying this, create a refbundle that attributes those opinions
Those are my thoughts for now. Ping me @Jolielover once you have addressed them and I'll have another look ^^ Elias 🦗🐜 [Chat, they chattin', they chat] 02:21, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I addressed most of your comments, see my edit. I rephrased most of what you suggested. And no - I can't find any reliable sources covering his unreleased songs. I also can't find many for One Direction's unreleased songs. I think FITF debuting at number 1 is relevant, since he has songwriting credits for the entire album. Found several journalists saying such, reflected such in the article. What do you think now? @PSA: jolielover♥talk 05:52, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Birdienest81

edit
  • For refs 44 and 45, the title Faith in the Future should be in italics per MOS:CONFORMTITLE.
  • The hyphen on ref 45 should be changed to an en-dash (–) per MOS:ENDASH

Otherwise, this list looks okay by me. Could you review 97th Academy Awards for its featured list promotion?

--Birdienest81talk 09:41, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done and done. Thanks! I'll check out 97th Academy Awards. jolielover♥talk 13:42, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
--Birdienest81talk 11:20, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

edit

Comments

edit
  • "in the top 10 of the UK Singles chart" => "in the top 10 of the UK singles chart"
  • "After co-writing a few songs" - "a few" is a bit vague. Either give an actual number or just say "After co-writing songs"
  • "sold over 3 million records in the United States" - I doubt that in 2013 it sold over 3 million physical records so change to "copies"
  • "which peaked at number 3 on the UK Singles chart" => "which peaked at number 3 on the UK singles chart"
  • "more than half of the tracks on Made in the A.M." => "more than half of the tracks on the group's final album Made in the A.M. (2015)"
  • "The song peaked at number 2 on the UK Singles chart" - same as before :-)
  • ""Back to You", Tomlinson's second solo single" => ""Back to You", his second solo single" (avoids repetition)
  • "Tomlinson also has songwriting credits on all tracks of his second studio album" => "He also has songwriting credits on all tracks of his second studio album" (same)
  • No need to relink Liam Payne in the last para of the lead as he has already been mentioned multiple times
  • The two uses of "single CD" should be changed to "CD single"
  • Notes a and b don't need any full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Done :) jolielover♥talk 09:53, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Great Northern route stations

edit
Nominator(s): JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a station list for the corresponding Great Northern route, which I created about a month ago and have been working on since. This is my first FLC so do let me know if I have done / am doing anything wrong. Thanks in advance, JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder

edit
  • I'll do a full review shortly but one drive-by comment: Italicised lines are those that are not constituent parts of the Great Northern route. is not compliant with accessibility requirements because screen readers used by people with vision issues won't read out that the text is italicised -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Any suggestions as to an alternative? Quite difficult to think of a way of doing it that's accessible but not obtrusive. The article does mention the constituent lines (Cambridge line, East Coast Main Line, Fen line, Hertford Loop line, Northern City line) and if you want I can repeat that before the start of each table as clarification for those unable to know where the italics are. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 19:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You can use a symbol instead of/in addition to the italics. See List of municipalities in Jaén which uses a color and a symbol. Make sure to use a legend too when you do this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done as a symbol before each line and no more italics.
    I wouldn't say a colour is necessary but a symbol would work -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

edit
  • Link all the stations named in the lead
    • Done
  • "Govia Thameslink Railway only share eight stations [...] this will rise to six" - maths doesn't seem to be right here
    • Fixed
  • "confirmed to have funded allocated to them" - funding, surely?
    • Fixed
  • "Half of the eighteen stations that have been closed did so" => "Half of the eighteen stations that have closed did so" (passive/active verbs don't work as it stands)
    • Fixed
  • "London Borough of Enfieldno surface" looks odd and I presume is a typo of some kind
    • Fixed
  • Notes d, f, j are not sentences so doesn't need full stops
    • Done
  • There are some duplicate notes which can be combined -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixed

Hope that's everything. Thanks for the comments and let me know anything else that needs doing. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
    • Done
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. Some of your columns have this, but not all.
    • Done
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If

the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.

List of municipalities in Jaén

edit
Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC) and Alavense (talk)[reply]

Alavense and I continue to bring up the lists of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in dozens of other similar featured lists. This is the eleventh nomination and has benefited from all the recommendations from the previous nominations so it should be pretty close to feature list status. All comments and suggestions are welcome, thanks in advance for all the comments! Mattximus (talk) 19:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dantheanimator

edit
  • Only thing I could think of, for the photo for Andújar, is there maybe a more city-scape/panoramic photo that shows more of the city aside from just one building? I did a brief search in commons and found this photo which feels slightly better, and there's also this photo but maybe there's better photos too. In any case, this is quite minor so support promoting now. Dan the Animator 21:08, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the image. Thanks for having a look, Dantheanimator. Alavense (talk) 06:39, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
  • File:Jaen in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Jaén 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Parador de Jaén 5.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chimeneas Los Lores y La Tortilla.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Ayuntamiento de Andújar, 2025.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:37132-Ubeda.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • alt text is good, image review pass
  • Good sources: 1, 3, 21, 22
  • Montizon for 2024 census is listed as 1.595 in source but 1,525 on the table, otherwise source 19 is good
Fixed. Thanks for noticing that, Easternsahara. Alavense (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • For 2011 census Torreperogil is 7.673 in source, it is wrong in article otherwise 20 checks out Source review pass since everything else is standard on other spanish municipality in province articles. good job, but when are we going to get to portugal? jk
Fixed as well, Easternsahara. Thanks again. And maybe one day we'll get to Portugal or another country, but there are still many, many to go in Spain. :) Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 15:05, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think Portugal would just be one list, it only has 308 municipalities... Mattximus (talk) 15:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious discography

edit
Nominator(s): Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. The list has reliable sources and I followed other discographies that are FL. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

edit

List of Dad's Army radio episodes

edit
Nominator(s): Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have recently improved this list substantially (if I do say so myself), adding various citations and expanding the lead to reflect all aspects of the list. This list has recently been peer reviewed, with a few comments being raised and improved upon. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "Dad's Army is a British television sitcom" => "Dad's Army is a British television sitcom broadcast between [whenever] and [whenever]" would give extra context
  • "From 1974 to 1976, a radio series was broadcast on BBC Radio 4" - maybe "a radio version"......?
  • "It was written by Harold Snoad and Michael Knowles, based on the scripts of the television episodes written by Jimmy Perry and David Croft. It was produced by John Dyas" => "It was written by Harold Snoad and Michael Knowles, based on the scripts of the television episodes written by Jimmy Perry and David Croft, and was produced by John Dyas" (avoids a very short sentence)
  • "The first series consisted of twenty-one episodes, including a Christmas special, which aired in 1974" => "The first series consisted of twenty-one episodes, including a Christmas special, and aired in 1974" (current wording makes it sound like only the Christmas special aired in 1974)
  • "The series starred...." - might be worth making it clear that these actors also played the same roles on TV
  • Same with James Beck a bit later
  • "Although most of the television episodes were adapted to radio, the following were not" - might be worth noting how many episodes of the TV version there were, as at this point we don't know if 13 "unadapted" episodes was a large proportion or only a tiny fraction
  • "Only one Christmas Night with the Stars sketch" => "Only one of the Dad's Army sketches broadcast as part of the BBC's Christmas Night with the Stars programme"
  • "as the radio series ended before the ninth series had aired in 1977" => "as the radio series ended before the ninth television series had aired in 1977"
  • Don't think you need to mention that Dyas was the producer twice in the lead
  • "Although James Beck recorded this episode before his death, he does not appear in this episode" - at first glance this doesn't seem to make sense. Did he record a part which was edited out?
  • THat's all I got. Great work! I can remember watching Dad's Army (as repeats - I'm not that old!) but never knew about the radio version so this was an interesting read -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for your feedback! I'm glad I have educated someone about this little-known spinoff to Dad's Army! The comments have now been addressed. Mr Sitcom (talk) 07:58, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @ChrisTheDude: I have since added an additional citation and additional information about casting. I thought I would let you know in case anymore changes need to be made as a result of this. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All good :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:18, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alavense

edit
  • However, only Lowe, Le Mesurier and Dunn appeared in every episode, as having each member of the cast in every episode was deemed unnecessary by the BBC radio department. However, all members of the main cast appeared from the second series onwards - Two consecutive howevers there.
  • A technical team composed of Eric Young, John Whitehall, and Ian Richardson - A serial comma is used there, but there are other instances in the list where it is not used. I think the easiest solution is to get rid of this one.
  • This was the final episode to feature Private Walker as portrayed by James Beck, who died soon after recording the episode - Maybe This was the final episode to feature Private Walker as portrayed by James Beck, who died soon after recording it, to avoid the iteration.
  • Although this episode was recorded before James Beck's death, his character does not appear in this episode - Same issue. Maybe Although it was recorded before James Beck's death, his character does not appear in this episode?
  • This episode features the first appearance of Larry Martyn as Private Walker. This episode was recorded at the end of the recording block for the second series; the earliest episodes of that series do not feature Walker - I suggest something along the lines of This episode, which features the first appearance of Larry Martyn as Private Walker, was recorded at the end of the recording block for the second series; the earliest episodes of that series do not feature Walker
  • Keep Young and Beautiful needs dab, as it points to an article about a song.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! These comments have now been addressed. Mr Sitcom (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to support. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:40, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of presidents of Dartmouth College

edit
Nominator(s): ULPS (talk • contribs) 23:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My first non sports FLC, so hopefully this goes well! Dartmouth College is the ninth oldest college in the United States and a member of the Ivy League, this article lists all of their presidents since it's founding. Thanks in advance to anyone who leaves their feedback :) ULPS (talk • contribs) 23:53, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

edit

The note "Joined College: 2023." seems unnecessary in the notes field for the current president since the year her tenure started is identified in the preceding cell. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:08, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, this was a remnant from when I was converting the tables. Fixed ULPS (talk • contribs) 00:28, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I don't know how pretentious this might be, but if the current president is a woman, wouldn't it be "alumna"? Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:57, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently yes.   Done ULPS (talk • contribs) 01:17, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  Done all ULPS (talk • contribs) 12:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit
  • The no image images are not needed, please remove them in favor of nothing.
  • Please have more specific alt texts.
  • Please archived the sources that aren't.
  • Could a Template:Infobox official post be added?
  • In paragraph two the whole paragraph can be sourced to an inline citation of source four, instead of multiple of the same one repeated.
  • "Not a Dartmouth alumnus", does not need a period as it is not a full sentence.
  • Could information on terms, term limits, and how often elections are held be added?
  • Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:02, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@History6042:   Done all except the last. There isn't a set term or limit, it's just whenever the previous president resigns or dies. ULPS (talk • contribs) 14:28, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:39, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Frankfurt

edit
Nominator(s): LivinAWestLife

Have been working to improve this article last month, which now has a substantial lead and history section. The table has been properly formatted. All buildings and figures are cited with a reliable source, and less reliable sources have been swapped out. Coordinates have been added to every building. This is part of my ongoing to attempts to improve "list of tallest buildings" articles in general. In addition, there are relevant images in the history section, a timeline of the skyline's growth, and a map to identify the ___location of the skyscrapers and their distribution. LivinAWestLife (talk) 23:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Mattximus

edit

Well done overall but a few issues:

  • Sections should not start with "this is a list of" as it's outdated and no longer used (as it is tautological). A better start for the tallest buildings section would be "Frankfurt has x buildings over xm tall. The first was built... etc". The notes about the table should be coded as notes (for example, "The “Year” column indicates the year of completion" should not be in the lead paragraph, but as a note for the year column).
  • Wording needs to be tightened up. For example "There are a few buildings taller than 100m outside the city". How many? Since we are referring to the list we should have a specific number.
  • Citations in the notes column and elsewhere in the article need to go at the end of the note, not the beginning.
  • I would remove the entire proposed section based on WP:CRYSTAL. Over the years of looking at these pages, most of the proposed are never even built. As an encyclopedia, it should only report actual tallest buildings, and not speculate on what buildings may be built in the future at some variable height and variable time in the future.
  • Leads for the next headings need work. For example, the under construction should start with "There are x buildings under construction in Frankfurt" and maybe a sentence about them.
  • Lead in timeline is not doing any work, need to summarize the table.
  • All images need alt texts to meet accessibility standards.
  • Oppose for now. Lots of work needed, but it's possible to pass with some effort. Mattximus (talk) 23:04, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LivinAWestLife: Do you intend to continue with this nomination? It does not appear that any of the concerns raised by reviewers over the last 3 weeks have been addressed. --PresN 12:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Figure Skating Championships

edit
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The results of this competition are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, and the sources are properly formatted. This particular list is structurally very similar to Ukrainian Figure Skating Championships and Estonian Figure Skating Championships, both of which have also been promoted to FL. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and I look forward to any constructive input.

Note: I have received special permission for this third FLC nomination here due to the time sensitive nature. Most of the sources require a subscription, and while I did purchase a month's access in order to complete this article, I would really like to not renew it for another month. It is also not possible to archive the Svenska Dagbladet articles. I can send via e-mail screenshots of any articles that another editor would like to examine as part of the source review. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit

Additional note from nominator: I am hoping to avoid having to purchase another month's subscription to the Svenska Dagbladet or having to save screenshots of 70+ articles, so if anyone is willing to do the source review for this FLC by September 4, that would be super appreciated. I can e-mail you screenshots of whichever articles you would like to examine. Warning: they are in Swedish. Please let me know if you're able to help, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:16, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of caviids

edit
Nominator(s): PresN 02:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everyone, mammal list #60 in our perpetual series and rodent list #5: Caviidae. This is the first in a series of seven lists covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs" (though it also includes porcupines, so it's not a great name). So we start out with the family that includes the guinea pig, 18 other species that look like feral guinea pigs, and 2 species of capybara, which has gotten recent internet fame for being very large and chill-looking. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:26, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

I'll do an image review here: History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:30, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Wildmeerschweinchen-06.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0 de
  • File:Cavia aperea distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Cavia magna (Wroclaw zoo).JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Cavia magna map.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:George the amazing guinea pig.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Cavia tschudii 31084241.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Cavia tschudii distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Cavia patzelti distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Cavia intermedia f825.JPG - Public Domain
  • File:Cavia intermedia distribution.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Cavia fulgida distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Galea flavidens distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Galea musteloides1.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Galea musteloides distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Galea leucoblephara 33484925.jpg - CC0
  • File:Galea leucoblephara distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Galea comes 453524410.jpg - CC0
  • File:Galea comes distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Preá-do-nordeste (galea spixii).JPG - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Galea spixii distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Microcavia niata distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Microcavia shiptoni distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Microcavia Australis.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Microcavia australis distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Чакоанская, или чакская, или малая мара (Dolichotis salinicola), Chacoan mara, Kleiner Mara, Tierpark Berlin Friedrichsfelde, 10.2012.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Dolichotis salinicola distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Dolichotis patagonum 99386074.jpg - CC0
  • File:Patagonian Mara Dolichotis patagonum distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Hydrochoeris hydrochaeris in Brazil in Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 09.jpg - CC0
  • File:Capybara range.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Hydrochoerus isthmius 19742666 (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Lesser Capybara range.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Kerodon-acrobata-asportella.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Kerodon acrobata distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Kerodon rupestris.jpg - CC BY 2.5
  • File:Kerodon rupestris distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • All images have alt text.
  • Image review pass, and I support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:40, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks to History6042 for doing the image review but I would like to note that File:Philander frenatus distribution.svg and File:Cavia magna map.svg have dead links for what they're based on (or atleast they wouldn't open for me)
    also File:Lesser Capybara range.png is based on a map which is based on a map, and so forth untill we get to File:Capybara-range.png which itself does not cite any sources. I checked most of the maps except the ones that NordNordWest made, which i checked about half of and then just assumed good faith cuz the guys got a good track record. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 23:52, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed the links (the IUCN changed its link format several years back) and replaced the Lesser Capybara map image with another one that directly cited the IUCN. --PresN 01:17, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

edit

List of protected areas of Peru

edit
Nominator(s): JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone! I was inspired by the recent WHS featured lists. For my first FLC nomination, I have chosen Peru, one of the most biodiverse countries in the world. I apologize if I have overlooked anything. Any review or feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all in advance! JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

Easternsahara

edit
  • ill do a review soon
    Thank you Easternsahara! Looking forward to your review. :) JustEMV🦙 (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please add an engvar template to deter article deterioration
  • File:Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas de Administración Nacional a setiembre de 2024 (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0 thank you very much for this
  • File:Peru, mount Huascaran.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Manu National Park-71.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Cordillera Azul National Park - ZooKeys-277-069-g005.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Paracas National Reserve. Ica, Peru.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:P1030590 Pérou, Reserva Nacional Salinas y Aguada Blanca, premières vigognes à l'état sauvage (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Pacaya Samiria Marañon River (66217327).jpeg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Bosque de Piedras (Huayllay). 3.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Puya raimondii en la Reserva Nacional de Calipuy (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Machu Picchu, Peru.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Aves en Pantanos.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Panorama Cotahuasi.jpg - PD
  • File:Panoramic view of the Reserva Comunal El Sira.jpg - CC0
  • File:Atalaya to Pantiacolla Lodge (23821713805).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Alto Mayo 598-602mod.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Cordillera huayhuash at sunny day.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Lago Menor o Huiñamarca Perú Bolivia Satelital map 68.85829W 16.png - PD
  • File:Imponente Volcán Yucamani.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Choquequirao - 5621104428.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:View of Huacachina.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Panguana-Lupuna-2008-2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Área de conservación privada Abra Málaga Thastayoc-Royal Cinclodes 0-21.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Fotografía sobre el Área de Conservación Privada Campo Verde en Ucayali 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Flag of Peru (state).svg - PD
  • I think that the first image, the map, could use more descriptive text. As the policy which History5042 cited says "With maps, diagrams and charts, the colour, position, and size of elements are not important. Instead, concentrate on the information being presented". Right now, you just have "Map of Peru showing the distribution of national protected areas by category:" which does not describe the information being presented. Instead just put the general ___location of everything, like "national parks are mostly found in the east and north of peru (just an example idk if its right)" Specify the general trend and indicate if there are outliers. This will be tedious but it is necessary
  • otherwise the alt text looks quite good and detailed, does not just repreat the caption.
  • the sronly text looks good but I don't know if it is necessary to specify "of Peru" on a page entirely and only about peru?
  • future source and prose review perhaps coming, i will pass image review once my concerns are addressed. I would like to thank you for countering systemic bias by contributing to this page.
  • Also I don't see the point of adding abbreviations to the legend for each of the tables, and I'll be removing some of the elements from the legend of those tables which don't use it.
    Thanks again. I’ll do the rest this weekend; in the meantime, I’ve added the engvar template and removed “of Peru” from the sronly text. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. Please let me know if the alt caption looks good now or if it still needs any refinement. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

  • Should "National System of State‑Protected Natural Areas" be redlinked? I searched for it on spanish wikipedia, but couldn't find anything.
  • Should "Protected Natural Areas Day" be redlinked?
  • "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas is the network of nationally administered protected areas managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas under the Ministry of the Environment. " → "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas (is the only network of nationally administered protected areas, managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas which is under the Ministry of the Environment."
  • "Its objective" Are you talking about the objective of the Ministry of the Environment, the National System of State-Protected Natural Areas, or the National Service of Natural Protected Areas? Please phrase it in a clearer way
  • I think everything else is fine but what does the em dash in the column represent? Does it mean that the value is unknown or that it is zero? At first I thought the latter but then saw 0 being used in one of the tables so could you include this in the legend for the tables that use them.
    Done Easternsahara, thank you for the suggestions. I did not add redlinks for National System of State-Protected Natural Areas or Protected Natural Areas Day, as I don’t think they are notable enough for standalone articles per WP:REDLINK. I also replaced the em dashes in the visitor numbers column with “Unknown” (the source is given in the column head), following the approach used in this recent FL. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 03:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it looks good. I will pass image review and endorse the promotion of the list 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 13:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you JustEMV🦙 (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Seattle Sounders (1974–1983) seasons

edit
Nominator(s): SounderBruce 06:29, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In continuing my series on Seattle sports team seasons, I have decided that writing about a defunct team (but not a defunct franchise) would be a nice change of pace. The original Sounders played from 1974 to 1983 in a very different soccer environment, one where Americans were allowed to change some of the sport's norms and rules to suit the tastes of the domestic audience. This list is formatted similarly to my other soccer FLs (Sounders FC, Reign, and Tacoma), with some modifications to conform with NASL's rules (as seen at the Cosmos list). (Note that this is my second concurrent FLC) SounderBruce 06:29, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • The lead image is very small and could be made larger. I would suggest setting upright=1.4
    • Done.
  • "Seattle was among four West Coast cities who were awarded an expansion team" => "Seattle was among four West Coast cities which were awarded expansion teams"
    • Fixed.
  • "the NASL doubled in size to 15 teams" - it had 7⁠1/2⁠ teams before.....?
    • Added a new sentence to explain things more clearly.
  • "more than that of the Seattle Mariners and Seattle SuperSonics" => "more than that of baseball's Seattle Mariners and basketball's Seattle SuperSonics"
    • Added.
  • "They were followed by the NASL itself in 1984" => "The NASL itself closed down in 1984"
    • Tweaked it.
  • "before reverting back to its original name" => "before reverting to its original name"
    • Fixed.
  • That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Four Continents Figure Skating Championships

edit
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Four Continents Figure Skating Championships are the the equivalent of the European Figure Skating Championships, but for skaters outside of Europe. This is the third of the four major figure skating competitions. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, a well-sourced history is provided, the sources are properly formatted, and relevant photographs are used. Additionally, I have already adapted changes that were requested on similar articles to this one so as to avoid the same issues. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

I will do an image and source review. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:03, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • All online sources are archived but 10, 35, 36, 37. Those were already archived.
  • All sources have publishers.
  • Spotcheck
    • 7 - Fail - The source was released in 2011, it cannot confirm something that happened in 2023-24, you need one that talks about the change. What is now source no. 7 should verify the entirety of the paragraph.
    • 13a - All good
    • 33a - All good
    • 41 - Fail, confirms everything but the fact that they have the most. All it's meant to verify is the total count and years. The fact that they have the most is determined by counting the results on the table.
Result: Wait, History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:History6042: These should now be addressed. I removed one errant source that wasn't helpful. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:03, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:International Skating Union logo.svg - Fair use - All good
  • File:Mens - Four Continents Championships 2009.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Four Continents Championships 2017 – Ladies.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Four Continents Championships 2011 – Pairs.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:2013 Four Continents Dance Podium.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Mikhail Shaidorov 2024 Worlds Short Program 4.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Chaeyeon Kim performing her free skate at the 2024 Grand Prix de France.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Riku Miura & Ryuichi Kihara 2024 Worlds Short Program 6.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Piper Gilles & Paul Poirier 2024 Worlds Free Dance 4.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:2018 Winter Olympics - Patrick Chan - FS - 04.jpg- CC BY 3.0
  • File:Mao Asada 2013 Grand Prix Final EX.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Fumie Suguri at 2009 Cup of China (1).jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:2019 Cup of China - Sui, Han - FS - Photo 12.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Bk dance spin.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:2008 Skate America Gala35.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:2011 WFSC 6d 560 Meryl Davis Charlie White.JPG - CC0
  • File:2012 WFSC 05d 800 Tessa Virtue Scott Moir.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:2014 Skate America - Madison Chock & Evan Bates - 06.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
Image review pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:01, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "At this time, there were no ISU member nations in South America, although Brazil was admitted as the first South American member nation in 2002" - I would say "At this time, there were no ISU member nations in South America; Brazil was admitted as the first South American member nation in 2002" works better   Done
  • "Skaters from all four of the founding continents have competed at all Four Continents Championships.[1] The Four Continents Championships have been held every year since, except for 2021, when the championships were cancelled on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.[2]" - I would reverse the order of these two sentences, as the sense of "since" (relating to the year in the first sentence of the paragraph) kinda gets lots with so much in between I actually just removed that one sentence altogether.
  • "The 2022 Four Continents Championships were originally scheduled to be held in Tianjin, China.[3] However, the Chinese Skating Association cancelled the event on account of the COVID-19 pandemic." => "The 2022 Four Continents Championships were originally scheduled to be held in Tianjin, China,[3] but the Chinese Skating Association cancelled the event on account of the COVID-19 pandemic."   Done
  • That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the good suggestions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:05, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of heteromyids

edit
Nominator(s): PresN 02:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everyone, mammal list #59 in our perpetual series and rodent list #4: Heteromyidae. Cousins to our last list, the gophers, here we have the kangaroo rats (and pocket mice). They're 63 tiny little guys with long tails and big back feet, hanging out all over the Americas. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:18, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98

edit
  • I would wikilink succulent plants (first cited with Gaumer's spiny pocket mouse unless I missed it earlier).

User:PresN: That's it. Like the others I've reviewed for you, it's excellent. I'll go ahead and support right now since I only have the one suggestion and it's not a deal-breaker. I'll come back and do the source review another day. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:15, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Already linked 2 mice higher up (though there was a typo). Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:22, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image Review

edit

History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:16, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Kangaroo-rat.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Agile Kangaroo Rat imported from iNaturalist photo 191451232 on 9 January 2023.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys spectabilis spectabilis 416332.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys-microps.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Dipodomys-deserti.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Dulzura Kangaroo Rat imported from iNaturalist photo 42392732 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys nitratoides.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Dipodomys ingens.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Padre Island kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Heermannskangaroorat.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Merriam's Kangaroo Rat.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
More coming soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:22, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Dipodomys venustus santiluciae - Pacific Grove Museum of Natural History - DSC06626.JPG - CC0
  • File:Dipodomys nelsoni by Renee Regan.jpg - CC0
  • File:Ord's kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Dipodomys ordii map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys ornatus.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys ornatus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 2.5
  • File:Panamint kangaroo rat.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys phillipsii perotensis 4697586.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dipodomys gravipes 64346443 (cropped).jpg - CC0
  • File:Stephens' kangaroo rat.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Kangaroo mouse.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Heteromys desmarestianus 2080141.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Gaumer's Spiny Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 182456081 on 17 April 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Heteromys irroratus texensis.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Heteromys irroratus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Heteromys nelsoni imported from iNaturalist photo 65355542 on 20 June 2020.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Heteromys pictus 2016299.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Heteromys pictus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Heteromys adspersus distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Heteromys salvini.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Heteromys salvini distribution map.png - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Mus anomalus Thompson 1815.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Chaetodipus baileyi.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Chaetodipus californicus.jpg - CC BY 4.0 - The animal is barely visible in the hand
  • File:Cerralvo Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 187890059 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chaetodipus eremicus 380821.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dalquest's Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 190966917 on 12 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Desert pocket mouse.jpg - Public Domain
Rest to come soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:16, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Chaetodipus hispidus2.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Little Desert Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 187495659 on 18 April 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chaetodipus formosus imported from iNaturalist photo 10634696 on 13 June 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Narrow-skulled Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 155559381 on 12 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chaetodipus nelsoni imported from iNaturalist photo 27682025 on 13 June 2019.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Chaetodipus intermedius intermedius 351159.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chaetodipus fallax.jpg - CC0
  • File:Sinaloan Pocket Mouse imported from iNaturalist photo 194828634 on 13 April 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Spiny Pocket Mouse.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Perognathus parvus.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Perognathus parvus map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Perognathus longimembris-Little Pocket Mouse.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Perognathus merriami.png - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Olive-backed pocket mouse.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Perognathus fasciatus map.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Apache pocket mouse (Perognathus flavescens apache) crop.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Perognathus inornatus.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Perognathus flavus.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Perognathus flavus distribution.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
Image review pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 03:52, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of works by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

edit
Nominator(s): Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. I have worked extensively on this list. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans

edit

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Passed.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

SafariScribe, does Ref 13 cover the informations for every information from where it’s located to the very bottom? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of cricketers with centuries in all international formats

edit
Nominator(s): DiamondIIIXX (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list as I have expanded the prose section and followed the same structure as a similar Featured List, List of cricketers who have scored centuries in both innings of a Test match. The page has received over 33,000 views this year, and over 200,000 since I created it. It is continually being updated by numerous editors due to the nature of cricket happening year-round. All comments are welcome, thank you. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "Scoring a century in any format is regarded as a landmark score, completing the feat in all three international formats is considered a significant milestone by the cricket community and media" - this sentence is not grammatically correct. I suggest adding "and" before "completing"
  • "The first player to score centuries in all international formats was Chris Gayle of the West Indies in 2007, after also being the first player to score the first T20i century" - this does not make grammatical sense for multiple reasons. "after also being" does not work and "the first player to score the first T20i century" is wrong because obviously only one player can do the first ever [something], so "first player to score the first T20i century" doesn't make sense. The whole sentence should be re-written as "The first player to score centuries in all international formats was Chris Gayle of the West Indies in 2007, who achieved the feat by scoring the first century in T20i cricket"
  • Link Zimbabwe and Kenya
  • Isn't "T20i" actually normally written as "T20I".......?
  • The lead seems very short and like more could be added. Can you spotlight the countries with the most players on the list and note the most recent player to complete the feat?
  • The sorting of the "player" column is wrong, it should sort based on surname, not forename
  • The exact date of each century should be shown, not just the month, and the month names should be written in full, not abbreviated
  • All of the First [whatever] columns should sort based on the date, not the score
  • Headings of the last three columns are unclear - presumably they mean total number of centuries......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:26, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I suggest adding "and" before "completing" - instead of adding "and", would a semicolon work instead of the comma?
    • "The first player to score centuries in all international formats was Chris Gayle of the West Indies in 2007, who achieved the feat by scoring the first century in T20i cricket" - Agree
    • Link Zimbabwe and Kenya - Agree
    • Isn't "T20i" actually normally written as "T20I".......? - I thought they were interchangeable, my mistake
    • The lead seems very short and like more could be added. Can you spotlight the countries with the most players on the list and note the most recent player to complete the feat? - Most of the sources are just lists and don't summarise the number of winners from each country, so would unfortunately be WP:OR.
    • The sorting of the "player" column is wrong, it should sort based on surname, not forename - Not sure how to make the table sort this way - any pointers?
    • The exact date of each century should be shown, not just the month, and the month names should be written in full, not abbreviated - Dates were abbreviated to fit better in the table and keep it compact. When using the full date the cells got much taller and decreased readability. Any suggestions on how to make it remain compact?
    • All of the First [whatever] columns should sort based on the date, not the score - Again, not sure how to configure this. Any pointers?
    • Headings of the last three columns are unclear - presumably they mean total number of centuries......? - It's each player's total number of centuries in the specified format. I thought [Format] + total was clear and concise.
    DiamondIIIXX (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I removed a bunch of references from the men's table that were from sites that were of dubious reliabilty (and looked like a major REFBOMB).
    • Have also sorted the sorting on both tables (including removing some unnecessary sorting on the country templates). Spike 'em (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Having said this removing some unnecessary sorting on the country templates, if I view on mobile (including selecting mobile version on a desktop browser), then the Team sorting is in a very strange order (starts Sri Lanka, West Indies then ends India, England) Spike 'em (talk) 16:46, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @ChrisTheDude - Article has been updated and prose has been expanded. Would be interested to know what you think of it now. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I personally still think that you should show the full date for each century but I will wait and see what others think...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !Completion Date becomes !scope=col | Completion Date. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Although you have the date as the first column, this is a list of people, so it should probably go on the name column. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |{{sortname|Chris|Gayle}} becomes !scope=row |{{sortname|Chris|Gayle}}.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 02:47, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • Just a comment, but to deter article deterioration, I would like if you put date and engvar templates. Also, please make the dates cited consistent in the article some use ymd and some use dmy
  • source review to come shortly

🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 14:21, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Imo State

edit
Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Imo from when the region was called Eastern then split into East Central and two other states, then East Central was splitted into Anambra and Imo states. I have significantly worked on this and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

Image review:

  • File:Imo State Government.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Imo State Flag.svg - CC0
  • File:Nigeria - Imo.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Ndubuisi Kanu Portrait.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Admiral Adekunle Lawal.jpg - Valid fair use rationale
  • File:A portrait of Dr Samuel Mbakwe (Dee Sam).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Governor Rochas Okorocha (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0 - Could probably be cropped.
  • File:Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha (cropped).png - CC BY-SA 3.0 History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. since the primary column seems to be the one wit the name, |'''[[Ndubuisi Kanu]]'''... becomes !scope=row |'''[[Ndubuisi Kanu]]'''.... If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Also, for some reason every row break (|-) has a floating quote mark? (|- ") The wikimedia interpreter ignores that, as far as I know, but it's odd.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 02:35, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, thank you so much. I improved the table accessibility now per your comments above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of cities in Oregon

edit
Nominator(s): SounderBruce 22:44, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another list of municipalities in a national subdivision, but this time it's back in the United States. This list is formatted similar to my recent FL on Washington's municipalities with some streamlining due to Oregon's lack of incorporated towns and classifications. SounderBruce 22:44, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

edit

With the last table, I would strongly recommend adding a column for references down the right-hand side. It would really help to declutter the table. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:58, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done, though I'm not entirely happy with the format as it stands. Might tweak it a bit more. SounderBruce 01:20, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It does look better. You could left-justify the column to match the others. If the references are stacking for you, you could consider using {{nowrap}}. You could also consider abbreviating Incorporated and Disincorporated – {{Abbr|Inc.|Incorporated}} and {{Abbr|Dis.|Disincorporated}} – so as to narrow the widths of those columns. I would also clarify above that table what incorporation and disincorporation are. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I would go as far as to abbreviate unconventional words for the sake of column widths, especially when the table itself is not wide enough to justify it. The concepts are explained in the lead, which is a more fitting place for the prose. SounderBruce 05:08, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was just making some suggestions because you said you weren't entirely happy with it. As it is, I think it's fine, although I would left-justify the reference column to match the others. I have not examined the rest of the article yet, but I will try to take some time to do that today! 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit

Easternsahara

edit
  • File:Oregon in United States.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Portland Oregon Aerial, June 2024.jpg - CC0
  • File:Eugene Oregon from Skinner Butte.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Salem Oregon downtown.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Downtown Gresham, Oregon.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • captions should usually be small and describe the image itself. therefore, i don think there is any need to have "the most populous city in Oregon", or the second most and so on. This information is present in the table/list
    • This is the format used in other municipality lists and helps explain why these particular images are included.
  • alt text checks out

i may do a source review if i have enough time, ill pass image review if u resolve the caption issues or just explain why the included part is necessary. 🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 17:02, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • put the "use american english|date=July 2025" and "use mdy dates|date=July 2025" templates to deter article deterioration
  • Using a newspaper to verify population is okay, you should also add the 2020 us census using the "Cite United States census" template
    • The Census data does not support the ranking among states, which is why the newspaper souree is used.
  • sources 1, 3, 4, 7*, 11, 14 check out
  • "all in the Willamette Valley" is not mentioned in source 7 or 2
    • Removed until I can find a direct source.
  • couldn't find "Greenhorn" in source 18
    • Replaced with a better table source, but Greenhorn is listed with no population and an inactive government.

🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 12:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara: Thanks for the review, I have responded to a couple of the notes. SounderBruce 22:09, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise for the delay, i will get back to reviewing this article soon or someone else can also takeover my source review 🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 22:34, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it wasn't soon but better late than never.

  • I understand that this is a large request but p. 22-32 is too large of a range, could you use sfn notes and add citation 18 into a bibliography section? You can then put the specific page next to the information you are citing it for. For similar reasons, I would request you also do this for citation 15. I believe that this is a common practice in Featured articles. if you absolutely do not want to do this, then consider asking the FLC coordinators if it would be appropriate here.
    • This would not be possible without adding hundreds of new citations and bloating the reference list. It's not unreasonable to have the current long ranges due to the nature of these two sources: both are long lists of data entries, and in both cases, verification of source–text integrity is a simple matter of matching city names to a small piece of data. I see it no different than some of the website citations here and in the Washington list that require a user to scroll through hundreds of entries to find the appropriate row.
  • checks out: 19
  • 20 does not verify the incorporated date but does verify everything else, i request u remove it from the refs section and instead put it in disincorporated and notes seperately

Comments from Mattximus

edit
  • Excellent list, just a few minor squibbles.
    • I would align the link in the first sentence to List_of_regions_of_the_United_States#Census_Bureau-designated_regions_and_divisions. Since you are using census data it makes sense to align with the US census regions.
      • Added a link to Western United States, but I do believe that "Pacific Northwest" is a far better and more common name than any Census designation.
    • I know someone above gave you contradictory advice, but personally I would remove the reference column and simply add the reference at the end of notes. I would also complete the last two missing notes with a statement on why they are former municipalities.
      • I have added notes to fill the blank cells, but will keep the references column for now.
  • That being said, neither of those recommendations are absolutely critical, so I will pre-emptively support and thank you for this excellent list. Mattximus (talk) 16:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If you look at a version of that table from before the references were moved, I think you'll agree that it was totally cluttered to the point of being distracting. I believe it is much more accessible now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the support. SounderBruce 22:09, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Added a header so it looks less like this review is from Easternsahara. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:56, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TechnoSquirrel69

edit

I've been looking for a nice list to start reviewing at FLC again, and this looks like a fun one! Citation numbers from this revision.

  • In addition to a map of the US, have you considered a map of Oregon with the listed cities marked? Maybe with just the county seats, since 241 might be too many dots to be useful.
    • Planning to work on this once I migrate my setup to a new desktop PC. QGIS is fussy when trying to add statewide layers.
  • Is there a better picture of Eugene? There isn't much to see in the current one, especially at smaller sizes.
    • Was unable to find a good skyline photo, and my own photos of Eugene are from the pandemic lockdowns, so not as representative of its normal level of activity.
      Hmm, I'll see if I can fix that the next time I'm down there later this year. —TS
  • The proper name of what's depicted in Gresham appears to be Main City Park, not City Park. Real apples and oranges, I know. :P With that said, and considering other buildings are pictured, I might prefer to just leave the name out of the caption.
    • Fixed.
  • The table needs anchors to make the {{Compact TOC}} work. (I also encountered this on List of municipalities in Washington, so you may want to take a look at the other lists you've worked on for this issue.)
    • Fixed on both lists.
  • Since citation 17 is already in footnote a, consider taking it out of the table header so it isn't as crowded.
    • Moved.
  • What's the distinction being drawn between the cities "annexed by" and "consolidated into"?
    • The municipalities that were annexed did not require a citywide referendum and were instead outright absorbed; for consolidations and mergers, the soon-to-be-defunct city's residents had to approve.
  • I realize there's more information about Damascus in footnote b, but I might expand slightly on "Approved in 2016" — what was approved?
    • Expanded.
  • Consider standardizing the capitalization of citation titles.
    • Standardized to sentence case for the news citations.
  • Citation 15: consider linking to the Internet Archive, since the county seats are only listed in the 2005–2006 edition and not the online edition. Bonus points for including |url-access=registration.
    • Done. I wish I had known about the Internet Archive's copy, as I had to stop in at the Seattle Central Library to scan a copy of the same edition.
  • Citation 34: consider linking Casey Parks, which I just redirected to the article on her memoir.
    • Added.

Great work, SounderBruce! Please let me know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:53, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment from CouvGeek

edit

I noticed the lead mentioned the amalgamation of a few municipalities to form Lincoln City, yet none of them are mentioned at #Former cities. Could you take a look and take care of that? CouvGeek (talk) 03:57, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added those three cities, thanks for finding that mistake. SounderBruce 06:05, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review

edit

To prevent this nomination from being archived, I shall conduct a source review. Patience would be appreciated since I'm from the city-state of Singapore, so I would be somewhat unfamiliar with the concept of multiple cities (though I imagine this wouldn't interfere much with this nomination). Icepinner 10:23, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig
edit

Earwig detected no copyvio concerns

Spot-checks
edit

A spot-check of every source would be conducted, though given the number of cities in the table, a handful of rows will be checked. 24 random cities (roughly 10% of the total number of cities) will be checked. I have yet to decide whether it should be applied to former towns or not. Note that an impromptu source review was conducted by Eastern Sahara a while ago, but things have changed since then. Feel free to object to any points raised.

@Easternsahara: may I enquire whether your source review is finished or not? I was aware that you engaged in some spot checks in your source review but I did not realise that it is technically incomplete, so I'd like to know whether it is still ongoing or not. Sounder mentioned this article needs a source review off-Wiki and I noticed it needed one on the FLC notice board. I do not intend to hijack your review and was simply unaware/unsure if your review was completed or not? What would be the appropriate course of action to take here? Once again, apologies! Icepinner 13:24, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • [1] problem: it is the 27th-most populous state, with 4,237,256 inhabitants I don't see this anywhere. Use [2].
    • The full version of Ref 1 (behind the paywall) has the following: "Oregon’s population grew by 10.6% from 2010 to 2020, reaching 4,237,256, according to data released in April. That’s up from 3.83 million a decade prior. Oregon remains the 27th most populous state in the nation."
    • I see. Icepinner 10:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • [2a] should be subsituted into [1]
  • [3a]: checks out
  • [4a]: mostly checks out, but it should be "more than 82 percent"
    • Fixed.
      • Approved
  • [5]: I mean, it is out of date for Portland but it would be impossible to update it consistently. Your call: update it or leave it as it is? A link to the relevant policy would be helpful. Other than that, checks out.
    • The U.S. census is only done every ten years, and the annual estimates in between are not used for these kinds of comparisons due to their data quality issues.
      • Okay then
  • [6]: is it necessary to include this? "Smallest" in the article is rather equivocal; it could be "smallest sized city" or "least populous city"
    • Yes, since this is the superlatives section that is supposed to contrast two extremes.
      • Alright
  • [2b] is it necessary to include this?
    • This is needed to support any 2020 data.
      • Fair
  • [7]: checks out
  • [3b]: Portland is listed as 133.43 sq mi, though...
    • Ref 8 is the most recent measure of land area and is used consistently within the table; Ref 3 is only there to support that Portland is the largest, not its current land area.
      • Righty then
  • [8]: the website is a bit janky. I see Barlow is listed correctly but Portland is a bit messed up. I'll assume good faith on this one
    • The third numeral column (ALAND) is the square mileage that we use.
      • I know, the number is there but isn't at the column iirc. The website in general is a bit cooked, so I'll say it's correct
  • [9]: checks out
  • [10]: checks out
  • [11]: checks out
  • [4b/12a]: checks out
  • [12b/13]: checks out
  • [4c]: checks out
  • [14]: checks out
  • [15a/b]: I'm most certainly missing out on something here. Pages 220-241 brings me to a gallery of assorted state symbols and the likes of it? There's an electoral map which includes counties but the cities are not indicated as county seats?
    • The citation uses the book's print page numbers, not the numbers assigned by the Internet Archive. Will be swapping for a more recent edition though, since it was finally uploaded there.
      • Even with the book's page number, it didn't lead to the page cited iirc. Regardless, I can't access the book without print disability software. I filed a query off-Wiki, so we'll see how that goes.

That's all I got now. I did not consult whether Easternsahara was finished with their source review or not (Sounder encouraged me to comment on this off-Wiki) so that will have to be clarified first before I can spot check the towns. Icepinner 13:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of the comments and queries above. SounderBruce 18:58, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@SounderBruce: Alrighty then. Btw, if you are interested, would you give List of Singapore LRT stations a look? I know it's quite recent, but this is a topic within your area, so I thought you might be interested. Icepinner 10:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

East German Figure Skating Championships

edit
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since Estonia was just promoted, I have another national skating championship article queued up. I am particularly proud of this one, because when I found this article originally, there was very little sourcing, plus the historical background. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, the sources are properly formatted, and there are relevant historical photos available from the East German archives. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
  • Should "German Ice Skating Association" be redlinked?
  • Should the note be in a seperate notes section?
  • File:Deutscher EisLaufVerband DDR Logo.svg - PD
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1988-0105-018, Katarina Witt.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-K1109-0008, Günter Zöller.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-70201-0003, Margit Senf, Peter Göbel.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1112-0020-002, Annerose Baier, Eberhard Rüger.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-N0324-0009, Jan Hoffmann.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-G0111-0012-001, Gabriele Seyfert.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-B1210-0011-003, Brigitte Wockoeck, Heinz-Ulrich Walther.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-E0109-0002-003, Annerose Baier, Eberhard Rüger.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • I added some alt text in the Senior medalists section; you can review my contributions to make sure they conform with the MOS. Image review pass

User:Easternsahara: I'm embarrassed at having forgotten the alt-texts; you'd think I'd have this covered by now. I don't think "German Ice Skating Association" should be redlinked. This is the defunct East German federation; not the one currently in Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, if you think that it shouldn't be redlinked then that is fine. Easternsahara (talk) 15:01, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit

Source Review:

  • Spotcheck:
    • 3 - All good, I think, my German isn't great.
    • 6 - All good.
    • 9 - All good.
  • Source review pass.

Prose:

  • Nothing objectionably wrong.

General:

  • Are any of the unlinked skaters notable enough for red links?
  • Most of the gold medalists are already linked. Per WP:NSKATE, silver and bronze medalists at national championships do not meet the criteria of notability unless they have also placed at international competitions. Honestly, I'm impressed we have articles for as many of these skaters as we do.

Nothing objectionably bad overall, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:35, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TheDoctorWho

edit
  • Since the logo isn't obviously in English, I think a caption might be useful here
  • "Jan Hoffmann holds the record for winning the most East German Championship titles in men's singles (with eight), while Gabriele Seyfert holds the record in women's singles (with ten). Heinz-Ulrich Walther holds the record in pair skating (with six), although those were not won with the same partner. Annerose Baier and Eberhard Rüger hold the record in ice dance (with seven)" ---- I think some simple rewording could be useful here to avoid "holds the record" in quick succession four times. Something like "The record in pair skating is held by Heinz-Ulrich Walther, with six medals, although not all of those were won with the same partner."
  • "During this same time period, the separate figure skating championships were held in West Germany; those results are considered part of the German Figure Skating Championships." --- doesn't quite read right grammatically to me, I believe dropping the word "the" (before separate) might do it
  • The records section is another one that looks odd to me with the table so far over, I'd suggest adding {{clear}} again to bump the table down below the photos. The table displays below the photos for me, but maybe that's just my computer, so I added the clear.

That's all I have! TheDoctorWho (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheDoctorWho: I have implemented all of your suggestions. Let me know if you have anything else, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:34, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just a difference on screen size. My laptop screen is 15.5", so for anything smaller than that it probably bumps down, while for anything bigger there's more breathing room. That should bump it down for everyone though and make it consistent. Either way, happy to support. TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

97th Academy Awards

edit
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 09:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 2025 Oscars for featured list because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 ceremonies were written. Birdienest81talk 09:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

edit

Here's an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 13:08, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:97th Academy Awards poster.jpg - Fair use
  • File:Sean Baker at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 2 (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Alex Coco and Samantha Quan at the 2024 New York Film Festival (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Adrien Brody-61584.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Mikey Madison at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 3 (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Kieran Culkin at the 2024 New York Film Festival 2 (cropped II).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Zoe Saldaña at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Walter Salles in 2024.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:PaulTazewell-byPhilipRomano.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:2024-03-09 SXSW Conan Nick-Kroll Office-Space events 07090 (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • Alt-text is proper, captions are too, all images are relevant.
    • I think it's safe to say that I'll be passing the image review. :)

OlifanofmrTennantmrTennant

edit
  • “Comedian Conan O'Brien hosted the show for the first time” I feel the wording implies O’Brien” has hosted again which he hasn’t
  • Link “Beverly Hills”
  • “and the first to do so in for a single film” stray in in there
  • Relevence of “Box office performance of Best Picture nominees”?
That’s what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:55, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @OlifanofmrTennant: I've linked Beverly Hills and removed the unnecessary "in" from the sentence. However, the sentence mentioning O'Brien hosting for the first time seems warranted since it has already been announced that he will host next year's ceremony. Unless you think that would violate Wikipedia:CRYSTAL. As for the box office performance of Best Picture nominees, it's been included for every Academy Award ceremony list since data was available starting with the 55th Academy Awards (with the exception of the 93rd and 94th ones due to the pandemic making it hard to compile such figures). It's just a way to make comparisons of each nominated film.
--Birdienest81talk 01:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If O’Brians return is confirmed than I think it’s worth mentioning that hell host the following ceremony but other than that it looks good. Olliefant (she/her) 05:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @OlifanofmrTennant: Done - Added text mentioning O'Brien returning as host located underneath "Ratings and reception" section since there is no article on the 98th Academy Awards ceremony yet.
--Birdienest81talk 07:08, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

edit
  • "I'm Still Here also was" => "I'm Still Here was also"
  • "With his wins for producing, directing, screenwriting, and film editing, Sean Baker became...." - for context, it would be worth saying what film this was for
  • "was selected to host 2025 gala" => "was selected to host the 2025 gala"
  • "Furthermore, the Southern California wildfires affected the telecast and its surrounding events" - I can't see any need for that first word
  • "Voting for the nominations which began on January 8, 2025, was originally planned...." => "Voting for the nominations, which began on January 8, 2025, was originally planned"
  • "and the Scientific and Technical Awards gala initially planned for February 18, was delayed" => "and the Scientific and Technical Awards gala initially planned for February 18 was delayed"
  • "For the first time, broadcast was made available" => "For the first time, the broadcast was made available"
  • "presented by five actors who were featured in each of the nominated films in the category" - as worded, this indicates that all five of them were in each of the films. Change to "presented by five actors, one of whom was featured in each of the nominated films in the category"
  • "The Academy also announced that none of the five nominees for Best Original Songs" => "The Academy also announced that none of the five nominees for Best Original Song"
  • " each of the nominated songs were highlighted" => " each of the nominated songs was highlighted"
  • "Bay Area, Atlanta, or Miami[c], " - footnote should go after comma
  • "up two three composers" => "up to three composers"
  • "can received individual statuettes" => "can receive individual statuettes"
  • "Animated feature films submitted for consideration in the Best International Featured Film category" => "Animated feature films submitted for consideration in the Best International Feature Film category"
  • "writing, " Whenever O'Brien was onstage" = there's a stay space after the quote mark
  • "dropping the performances Best Original Song nominees" => "dropping the performances of the Best Original Song nominees"
  • "in favor musical tributes to James Bond and Quincy Jones" => "in favor of musical tributes to James Bond and Quincy Jones"
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ChrisTheDude: Done - I have read all of your comments and have made corrections based off of them.
--Birdienest81talk 21:25, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HIstory6042

edit
—Birdienest81talk 05:58, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, all good, pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:13, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jolielover

edit

Heads up, first time reviewing.

  • Duplicate references: 5, 32
  • Reference 58 appears to be wrong, leads to another article (same article as ref 28)
  • No dubious/unreliable sources
  • Ref 75 - I would remove this, doesn't appear to mention the song's name (and the video description says the sound was modified due to copyright). If it does and I've missed it, add a timestamp. Ref 76 verified this though.
  • Spot check:
    • Ref 20
    • Ref 39 - doesn't mention the QR code was shown throughout
    • Ref 73
    • Ref 16
    • Ref 74
    • Ref 76

jolielover♥talk 14:48, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Jolielover: Done - I have addressed all your comments with some notes:
  • Merged refs 5 and 32
  • Ref 58 was part of a section of entitled "Blockbusters Wicked and Dune: Part Two up for awards" attributed to Sarah Whitten. That section was part of the larger ref 28, which was a running live update of the ceremony. However, I decided to combine them to avoid confusion.
  • For ref 39, I changed the word "throughout" to during the "broadcast". The ref mentions AMPAS CEO Bill Kramer asking for fire relief via a QR code.
  • Ref 76 (originally ref 75 in your review) was not removed because that video does list every single person that was honored as part of the "In Memoriam" montage. Instead, to avoid confusion, I rearranged the refs with said ref to YouTube video now being on its own sentence. It has to remain there or else there is no credible source verifying all the people that were mentioned during the segment.
That is all. I will take a look at your FLC for Louis Tomlinson a bit later.
----Birdienest81talk 20:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Jolielover: Re-pinging Jolielover as a courtesy call for these comments. Birdienest81talk 18:26, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by Alavense

edit
  • Is Hamish Hamilton the Hamish Hamilton who directed the ceremony? If so, he could be linked.
  • two films [...] were both nominated simultaneously - We have two, both and simultaneously, so I think the idea is quite clear and we can get rid of both. What do you think?
  • Beginning at Best Actress nominee Karla Sofía Gascón became, you have three consecutive sentences using the same structure, which reads a bit repetitive.
  • was selected to host 2025 gala - the 2025 gala?
  • and proceeded to thank them -> and thanked them
  • writing," Whenever - There's a typo there.
  • select O'Brien to host the following year's ceremony scheduled for March 15, 2026 - Maybe 98th Academy Awards could be linked there, given that an article will be created at some point.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Alavense: Done - I have read all your comments and have made corrections based off of them:
  • Linked Hamish Hamilton the director
  • Removed the word both from the sentence about two non-English feature films nominated for Best Picture and Best International Feature Film at the same time
  • Changed the word "became" to "was" for the Zoe Saldaña sentence in order to prevent redundancy.
  • Add missing "the" to "was selected to..."
  • Removed "proceeded to" and changed tense of thank to read "and thanked them"
  • Fixed spacing to sentence 'Writing, "Whenever..'
  • linked the words "following year's ceremony" to 98th Academy Awards.
Thank you for your comments.
--Birdienest81talk 08:35, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work. Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 08:48, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of cancelled Nintendo 64 games

edit
Nominator(s): Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it is an interesting topic, the included entries are well organized and well cited, and the list as exhaustive in its completeness as possible. While it is technically not fully complete, as there are a few other cancelled N64 games not listed, these games do not have coverage in reliable sources and are thus ineligible for conclusion; as such, while I continue to monitor news sites for new possible inclusions, I believe this article is now in the best shape possible, given both the current guidelines and the information available. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 05:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

edit
  • Glad to see another video game list at FLC!
  • I don't know that the table needs a smaller font size as it is, but if you must, it can't be lower than 90% (currently: 85%), and even then, maybe just the notes column?
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !width=20%|Title(s) becomes !scope=col width=20%|Title(s). If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |id="0–9"|''[[1080° Snowboarding 2]]'' becomes !scope=row id="0–9"|''[[1080° Snowboarding 2]]''. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 12:34, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    All formatting changes are now complete. Most of the lists of cancelled video games are similarly formatted, so I'll try to carry these changes over to the others as well. Honestly, most of them are in similar good shape and would also probably be worthwhile features. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    PresN - Is there a way to fix the accessibility problems without changing of the formatting that seems to come with it? I've always been perplexed with the resulting look, where one column is randomly bolded and center aligned. I'm all for accessibility but I generally think the bold/centering of the game column doesn't looks right in reference to the rest of the columns. Sergecross73 msg me 20:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know about the bolding, but a left-align style could be applied; that might make it a little more palatable. See my sandbox for an example. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do think that looks better. Sergecross73 msg me 00:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Sergecross73 and Cyberlink420: If you add the "plainrowheaders" class to the table (which I just did in Cyberlink's sandbox) it will unbold the header cells; they're right as well about what to do about left-aligning the column. --PresN 13:01, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I appreciate it. It now looks like what I had in mind when I started rewriting/cleaning up these sorts of lists. I'll be sure to use this moving forward to eliminate the accessibility concerns too. Sergecross73 msg me 14:37, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

edit
  • Please change the first sentence per MOS:THISISALIST.
  • Please add row scopes.
  • Please add column scopes.
  • Any available images?
  • Please archive all sources as you have already done most.
  • Why are some games listed without publishers?
  • Please link Nintendo in the Metal Slader Glory 2 row.
  • In this nomination you say "While it is technically not fully complete" and in the article it says "all known games that were announced", please fix this discrepancy.
  • Please link Windows in the 360: Three Sixty row.
  • Please add table captions.
  • Ping me when done or if you don't know what some things are. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:35, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Some video games start development without a publisher, and are cancelled before they procure one. That's usually the case when I leave them blank in these sorts of lists. Sergecross73 msg me 13:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @User:History6042 Manual changes are complete, and IABot has just finished archiving the remaining links; the only exception is the blank developer/publisher fields. As Sergecross said, several of these games were cancelled because their developer never found anyone willing to publish the game, so there is no publisher to list. Similarly, some games were announced by their publishers, but no developer was confirmed in the announcement. As for images, I felt the table format does not lend itself well to including inline images. At most, I could see having pics of the N64 and 64DD in the lead, but that's about it. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    support History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cukie Gherkin

edit

Just setting this here. My plan is to verify that there are no reliable sources for any cancelled games not on this list. If I find any in the search I am doing, I will post the games and sources here that I believe should be included, if any. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely look at the talk page, then, as it lists several games still in need of sources. Would love to find one for X'Treme Roller in particular, since it's a little ironic that a game with a playable prototype doesn't currently qualify for the list. -- Cyberlink420 (talk)
I'll check out for that then, and I'll post my findings there in a thread. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Still working on it. I found some sources, but only a couple missing games I found that were verified A) in development for Nintendo 64 and B) cancelled. So far, I would recommend adding Vampire Circus and Aquaria, as both are verified to have development ended or at least not materialized. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Both games have been added. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 13:47, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I hate to do this, but I feel like I must oppose this nomination. In my spotcheck, I went through 0-9 and A, and I found that nine out of 17 had minor to major citation issues, not even accounting for ambiguity re: whether something was cancelled. This leads me to believe that there are likely dozens of potential issues of OR. I do not think it a difficult thing to fix, but it will take a lot of time to read through and find sources to cite uncited info. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 02:55, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I question how one is supposed to cite something's nonexistence? The existing sources verify that the games existed at one point, but much of the time, the game was announced, and then no further mention was made of it ever again. How do you cite an absence of information? -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 03:07, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not talking about that; I'm talking about information absent that is citable, like the publishing of Cubivore in North America and the entry on Actua Golf making assumptions that the work on it was put into the PGA game. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I opted to do a spotcheck on the B's, but it only made me solidified in my concerns about whether the list is ready to be featured. As detailed below, one entry misstates what sources said about Blade & Barrel's connection to Knives Edge, which to me is a major issue (and feels like it would have been caught on a thorough review of the sources). I would strongly recommend withdrawing and ensuring that all information is fully accurate. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pass. I stand by the quality of the work Sergecross and I have put in on this page over the last year and a half. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You two have obviously done good work, but this does not mean that a page has been thoroughly vetted for featured page standards. Did you go through each entry to ensure that every claim is attributed before nominating? Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck by Cukie Gherkin

edit

I'll be doing a spotcheck to ensure the accuracy of the claims in the list. I will format it by game, skipping any games where I feel the entries are adequately sourced. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:43, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

0-9

  1. 360: Three Sixty: In the source, it only refers to a game called "3Sixty". Without evidence that this version was called "360: Three Sixty", it should be called "3Sixty" and link to 360: Three Sixty
    My version of the entry included both titles. I'm not sure why that was changed. I usually list off alternate tentative/working titles to clear that sort of stuff up. Sergecross73 msg me 19:34, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. 40 Winks: Nintendo Power is not mentioned in any of the sources, nor is the existence of review copies
    Added. Source was present in its respective article. Sergecross73 msg me 19:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 64 Wars: Should mention compatibility with GB Wars 2, as indicated in the Spaceworld Guide Book, 1v1v1 gameplay (IDK how to phrase that to be fair), and polygonal battle scenes
    Added the bit about 3D and GBW2. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. 7th Legion: In researching this to see if a stronger source on its cancellation should be found, I found this article: [1] Not only was I not able to find a source on its cancellation, I actually found that IGN still listed a release date. Do you have any sources that contradict this obvious mistake?
    For the record, regarding 7th Legion, almost no 64DD games were released. 64DD#Released suggests only 10 came out. Its hard to find sourcing because it's Japan only stuff for a 1990s console, but from my reading on it, it barely released at all. After years of issues and delays, they just released a handful of games to try to recoup some of their costs at least. Sergecross73 msg me 19:28, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A

  1. Acclaim Sports Soccer: One source identifies the alternate name as "Major League Soccer".
    Added. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Actua Golf: I feel like the sources don't clarify that no Actua Sports titles were released on any platforms after this. Consider cutting this. Also, I think the source may have been misinterpreted; it doesn't seem to suggest that development on Actua Golf was repurposed, just that the dev team of Actua Sports worked on this too.
    Cut the "any platform" bit. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Animal Leader: The localization of Cubivore: Survival of the Fittest is unsourced
    Added. Source was present in its respective article. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Assault: Retribution: The game does not seem to be mentioned in the source (it seems like they're calling it Assault? If so, it is also not sourcing that it's a port or of what game)
    Assault and Assault: Retribution are the same game; Retribution was just its subtitle in North America, while it was just Assault in Europe. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Attack!: PlayStation platform not cited
    Removed. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

B

  1. BattleSport 2: Three issues: one, both sources use BattleStorm II. Two, Acclaim is mentioned in GamePro 107 as being involved in publishing, but not mentioned in the list. Three, that it was slated for release on the Panasonic M2 is not verified.
Updated title. Acclaim is only mentioned in reference to the PS1 version, with no indication that they were publishing the N64 version as well. The M2 mention seems to have been inherited from the main article, which makes the same claim; it's since been removed. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Beetle Adventure Racing 2: Two points: the source doesn't refer to it as Beetle Adventure Racing 2, and the critical success of the predecessor should be either verified using a non-biased source, or it should be clarified that the development team viewed it as a critical success
Updated the title and removed the "critical success" bit. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Blade & Barrel: The timing of the announcement is not verified in any of the sources (all of which are dated 1997). Also, "some members of the press speculated that elements of the game were carried over into Kemco's later aerial combat game Knife Edge: Nose Gunner" is original research; the IGN source specifies that resources have been put into Knives Edge, which can and likely does just mean money, while GameSpot merely states that it is not known whether it has anything to do with Blade & Barrel.
Updated to remove announce year. I maintain the note about the press speculation is accurate, but I'm not interested in fighting over it, so it's been removed. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which source(s) do you believe demonstrated press speculation, and what exact passage are you citing for that? Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The exact same two you already cited, which leave room to be interpreted differently by different readers/editors. Again, though, I'm not interested in arguing over it, which is why it was removed. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it important to clarify, since there was an earlier instance of pointing to a citation in an entry's page, not featuring an inline citation verifying info is an issue that causes the list to fail FLC criteria 3b. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delegate comment here: to make sure we're on the same page, I want to start off by saying that I was very excited to see this nomination; I've been a WPVG member for nearly 20 years and have been doing lists for a long time, and was really happy to see what could be the start of a series of FLs. I am also very familiar with the difficulty of getting precise source backing for games from the 90s, especially Japanese games, especially games that didn't even come out; this is truly a monumental undertaking and I respect that. But to add context, most source reviews find 0 concerns with the sources not backing the content, and the ones that do find issues find only a couple small ones. Spotchecks are also typically just checking a handful of citations, not checking hundreds.

At this point, Cukie has found problems with 12 out of the first 19 rows, representing checking 6% of the table and 12% of the references, and they spent a week on it. Some of these are small or gray areas- lack of specificity in the source, or things that could be added. But some are just flat out details not provided in the cited sources, and again, the expected number of problems when checking ~10% of the sources is 0, or like, 1. I appreciate that y'all have put a ton of work into this list - it's a very ambitious project! - but at this point I really recommend that y'all do a very deep scouring of the rest of the list for issues, because if the expectation is that if another reviewer looks that hard at the other 94% of the table (which would take months at this rate) that they'll find just as many issues - or even more than a handful of issues! - and y'all won't check until a reviewer catches it, then that's really not a reasonable ask for reviewers. --PresN 02:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My frustration comes from the fact that I did spot-check it before initially submitting. And then spot-checked it again after the first start on a review, hence all those revisions between the 16th and 17th. I understand that individually checking 300+ sources isn't fair for any reviewer, to which I fully agree, but claiming that I "won't check until a reviewer catches it" hardly feels like a fair assessment. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 07:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize

edit
Nominator(s): Dan the Animator 05:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Started working on this about a few months ago and I think it's about as ready for the FL process as it can be. This is my first award list FL nom so excited to see how it turns out and hoping to eventually use this as a general model/template for the other Ukrainian award list-type articles. Many thanks in advance to everyone for the comments and feedback! :) Dan the Animator 05:32, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98

edit

This was originally a drive-by comment. More thorough comments will appear below this brief earlier discussion. Is there a reason all of 2010 is italicized? Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: The footnote on 2010 and the lead explains into more detail but for 2010, the three laureates listed were selected to win the prize but the president never signed the decree needed to make that award official & to give the rewards. That said, would it help if something else was added? The Ukrainian Wikipage formats 2010 the same as 2013/2018 (i.e. with just a short paragraph explaining that year's situation) but I feel like that formatting is inaccurate since 2010 did have laureates in a way. Dan the Animator 06:29, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: I added into the lead a brief explanation so it now reads "were selected by the award committee for 2010's prize (shown in the table in italics)" though let me know if additional changes/additions would make it more clear. Also can make it bolded too for greater contrast though I think the italics stand out enough as is. What do you think? Also thanks for being the first nom commenter :) Dan the Animator 22:45, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Infobox
  • Lest I bring the wrath of the Capitalization Police© into this discussion, there appear to be some capitalization irregularities in the infobox. I would have State prize as that does not appear to be a proper noun, and then I would capitalize the first word of each item (ie. Oustanding contributions, A diploma).
  • Done fixed State prize, Outstanding, and changed the rewards field to begin with Diploma. Speaking of capitalization, should the article be moved to "Oleksandr Dovzhenko State prize"? Official legislation refers to it as a State prize and it would make the article more consistent though I'm not sure if there's any standards for award article titles. Let me know what you think. Also I wouldn't worry too much about the Capitalization Police©, I think my recent edits should take care of any of their concerns ;)
  • I'm not sure a special notice of posthumous awards is necessary in the infobox, since they will no doubt be noted in the table below. I assume the 3 posthumous awards are included in the 37 total?
  • Yup, the 37 includes the posthumous laureates. I added it in since the award infobox does have the field for it and it is a useful stat though I can take it out if it's too confusing. The lead and table both mention/note the posthumous laureates.
Lead
  • Considering today's climate, I would probably not refer to anyone as "Soviet Ukrainian". I would just stick with "Ukrainian".
  • Dovzhenko primarily self-identified as and is generally considered by sources as a Soviet citizen. That said, he was also born in Soviet Ukraine to a family with Ukrainian heritage and is strongly associated with Ukraine, especially in the context of this award. Thus, the most accurate/straightforward description of his identity is Soviet Ukrainian and the link to Soviet Ukraine also clarifies this too.
  • I would recommend a proper lead (brief description of the award, brief explanation of the process, and total number awarded), and then a separate section afterward where you can go into more detail. You have several lengthy footnotes that, quite honestly, would work better as actual text.
  • I would think the lead as-is is proper. It already has all the components you mentioned: a brief description of the award (paragraphs 1/2), brief explanation of the process (paragraphs 1/2), and total number awarded (paragraph 3) and doesn't include any excess information (all the lengthy details are placed in the footnotes which I think works well here since the majority of the info in the footnotes isn't necessary for a general understanding of the award). This is also supposed to be a list after all and I tried to model it on the other current award FLs (particularly the Arthur C. Clarke Award) and I think the current organization of important/general info in the lead and extra/detailed info in the efns works well.
  • "for 2010's prize" – Consider rephrasing this as "for the prize in 2010".
  • Done
  • "For Huba, he was later awarded as the sole laureate for 2014..." This fragment sounds awkward. "Awarded" needs a direct object; maybe a different verb like "recognized" or "honored" would work better?
  • I reworded it to For Huba, he was later officially given the award as the sole laureate for 2014 in recognition of his overall career and contributions to Ukrainian cinema. Let me know if it's better now.
  • "No individual has yet officially received the prize more than once although Huba remains the sole person to have won the competition (i.e. be selected by the award committee) twice: in 2014 and in 2010's unawarded prize." This is contradictory, although I get what you're trying to say. I would simply ended the sentence at "once", and then start another sentence to explain the technicality behind the unawarded title.
  • I thought it would be good to keep these two in the same sentence to emphasize the distinction between winning the prize and being awarded the prize. The statement "No individual has yet officially received the prize more than once" isn't correct without the caveat put in by the second part because, depending on how that statement is read, technically Huba did actually receive the prize twice. For 2010, he just didn't get the diploma/medal/cash rewards and, based on a literal/strict reading of the prize's rules, the prize was not given because of the unsigned presidential decree (although as some of the other footnotes imply, the award often historically hasn't been kept to all of its rules, mostly with deadlines and such). This caveat is reflected in the official source cited (Ref #6 from the Dovzhenko Film Center) which describes the 2010 award as actually having been "awarded" (quote: In addition, in 2010, the film crew of "The Declaration" was awarded the Dovzhenko State Prize, but the ruthless role of Soviet functionaries was skillfully intercepted by officials of the new era: for unknown reasons, the order was not signed at the "highest level."). Personally, I think if the sentence is fully understandable, that might be the most important thing because explaining this sort of technicality without the excess detail that's left for the footnote is difficult.
Table
  • I would capitalize the first word in each cell (ie. Actor, Director, etc.).
  • The capitalization, spelling, order, etc. is all taken verbatim from the official presidential decrees cited (this is also explained in footnote m). I think for accuracy, given the Profession/Honorifics column isn't necessarily supposed to represent the laureates' Profession/Honorifics but just what the presidential decree says, keeping it source accurate would be ideal.
  • Maybe remove the "for his/their..." Just start with "Outstanding contribution to... blah, blah, blah.
  • Again, per above, everything was copied verbatim from the presidential decrees. For source accuracy, this should be kept as-is. Also worth mentioning other award FLs also have their rationale column entries starting with a dizzying number of "for"s (one example)
  • For years where there are multiple recipients, how did you determine what order to list them? Barring any explanation, I would list them alphabetically, since they're all (presumably) equal.
  • Unless there's a mistake somewhere, they should all be listed in the same order as they are in their cited presidential decrees.
  • 2010 table formatting
  • Although all the above about capitalization, the "for", and ordering are based on the presidential decrees, for 2010, because there is no presidential decree, it's done mostly for consistency with the others (i.e., capitalization matching all the other years, the "for" wording keeping it consistent with the other year rationales, and the ordering based on the other group years (1998, 1999, 2004, etc.) where the director is always listed first, then the cinematographer, and then the composer
  • Movie titles should be italicized and without quotation marks.
  • Fixed everywhere in the article except the table. Because 2010 is distinguished with italics, I thought italicizing the movie titles would make it somewhat confusing. There is also the issue of whether the Declaration of Love movie title should/shouldn't be italicized since the whole text as-is for 2010 is already italicized. What do you think? I could use bolding instead of italics to distinguish 2010 but I feel like that would make it stand out way too much compared to the rest of the table. There's also the option of color but again it would stand out too much and color is generally less preferable for creating distinctions in tables. Also, as mentioned in the much earlier conversation/replies, the Ukrainian Wikipage formats 2010 similar to the unawarded years and my intention with the italics was to make it so 2010 does stand out a little but not too much since a lot of the sources do ultimately treat the 2010 laureates as laureates
Bgsu98: Done, I added in the underlining and italicized the rest of the movie/book titles Dan the Animator 21:10, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having the 2010 data italicized is fine. You can merge those reference cells since they all show the same reference (currently no. 6).
  • I think having individual reference cells for each row just looks nicer (the alternative creates excess whitespace that can't be removed) and it doesn't hurt to repeat the refs for each row imo
  • This is an entirely personal preference, but I would shade in the 2013 & 2018 long cells with a slightly different shade to make it stand out. Personally, I use color no. e5e4e2.
  • Done perfect suggestion, thanks Bgsu98! :) Went with the light gray default color which felt a bit better for this list
  • I would do the same for 2020 and 2023 with some text like "No prize awarded". You don't have to provide an explanation since a) this was already mentioned in the text above, and b) you don't an explanation to give.
  • Done
Footnotes
  • Like I said, those footnotes are ginormous, and really should be incorporated into the article proper.
  • I don't think it makes sense to have that sort of detail as prose imo and the footnotes help for convenient placement

I always appreciate seeing Ukrainian interests promoted on Wikipedia, so this is a great article, but the structure needs some work. Please let me know if you have any questions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:06, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Bgsu98:! :) Finished replying to everything I think and let me know if the replies make sense and if there's anything else I can do. Dan the Animator 05:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bgsu98: it's been a minute and I think I addressed everything above so let me know your thoughts. Hope all's well and thanks for the review :) Dan the Animator 23:09, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dantheanimator: You have some dates formatted D/M and some M/D. You need to pick one (probably D/M), and make sure they're all consistent. Additionally, the notation about the dagger icon, which you have embedded in a footnote, needs to be placed above the table per MOS:LEGEND. The table also needs a caption. Those are all edits that need to be done. I still strongly believe that rowspanning the references makes sense, especially considering the column immediately before it – the Rationales – are already rowspanned. I also believe the text in the Profession and Rational column should be in sentence-case (meaning the first word should be capitalized). Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98:
  • Done I think I fixed all the date formatting so they are all DMY (personally, the dates read very strangely the way they are now so if someone else could verify that they're still grammatical that'd be great). Also let me know if I accidentally missed any
  • For the legend, could you give an example FL with the formatting you had in mind? All of the FLs with legends that I've found include it for cases where color is also used together with the symbol and I can't find the legend template that seems best suited for this case Any format is fine, as long as it appears before the table.
  • Should already be done I think?? The table includes caption="Tabulated list of recipients of the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize" but I'm not sure if this is a sufficient alternative to the code in the table markup page you linked (in my past successful FLNs, I never had an issue with using this caption markup so hopefully it should be alright as-is) I checked and the caption is set for screen-reader, so it's all good.
  • Done After second thought and testing it out, I added in the rowspanning for the Refs column where applicable. Thanks for suggesting it again Bgsu98! :)
  • For the reasons given earlier above and considering other current FLs have it the same, I still don't think that making the two columns in sentence case is necessary
Also, I wanted to bring this question from above up again but do you think the article title should stay as-is or be changed to "Oleksandr Dovzhenko State prize"? The Ukrainian language name has 'state' uppercased and 'prize' lowercased ("Державна премія") but in English, at least in the U.S. in my experience, it's common to treat official award names as proper nouns. What do think? That's up to you; I would probably keep it all capitalized.
And sorry about the delay... got caught up with other things for a bit
Dan the Animator 02:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dantheanimator: Once you get the legend in place, I can sign off on this. Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:07, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: done, added in all the relevant markup and templates. Let me know what you think and many thanks for the suggestion :) Dan the Animator 01:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
  • File:Ukraine award Dovzhenko.JPG - Public Domain; Image review pass
  • You seem to be using American english, add the use american english template
  • Done
  • also add use dmy dates template
  • Done
  • The award was established by presidential decree on 10 September 1994 by Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" → "The award was established by presidential decree on 10 September, 1994. Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma did so to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" making it into two sentences will vary the prose, make it shorter and easier to understand.
  • I think the sentence as currently written isn't particularly long and is straightforward imo. Also don't think it makes sentence to put "10 September 1994" and "100th anniversary of Dovzhenko's birth" in separate sentences since the latter directly refers to the former
  • Sure but then can you make it "The award was established by Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma's presidential decree on 10 September 1994 by" I thought it was kind of confusing.
  • I just took out the presidential decree part since it's not too important for the sentence and is already technically implied as-is. Take a look now and let me know what you think....it definitely reads a bit better :)
  • "Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine" should this be linked, if there is so much coverage for this prize, then there should be for individual committees, yes?
  • There is an article about the Committee on the Ukrainian Wikipedia but I couldn't find enough coverage/sources to support having a separate article here. I could make a redirect to this page if it helps though. What do you think?
  • You could make the redirect, that is fine.
  • Made the redirect. Also should apologize but I think I mixed up this prize with another since I couldn't find the committee wikipage for this award. Sorry for the mistake with that and thanks for commenting on it
  • "Award decisions are made by the Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine—a group of eleven leading figures in the country's cinema[d] appointed by either the government of Ukraine or the Committee's chair on a voluntary basis to review prize submissions and identify the best works of Ukrainian cinema" → "Award decisions are made by the Committee for the Oleksandr Dovzhenko State Prize of Ukraine: a group of eleven leading figures in the country's cinema[d] appointed by either the government of Ukraine or the committee's chair. Serving voluntarily, their purpose is to review prize submissions in order to identify the best works of Ukrainian cinema."
  • Great suggestion! :) I split the sentences though used somewhat different wording. Take a look and let me know your thoughts
  • "The Committee's final selection is then sent to the Ukrainian president, who officially grants the award by September 10[f] through a presidential decree and designates the cash amount for that year's award.[" → "The Committee's final selection is then sent to the Ukrainian president, who, through a presidential decree, officially grants the award by September 10[f] and designates the cash amount for that year's award." I think it is more organized and prose is more varied this way
  • I did some general rewording in that and the other preceding sentences so hoping it's better now. Let me know what you think of it
  • "The same individual is eligible to receive the prize more than once, provided that at least five years have passed since the first award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." → "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again, provided that at least five years have passed since the previous award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." The same individual is unclear
  • The award rules technically allow anyone to receive the prize an indefinite number of times so I wanted to emphasize that the same one person could win the prize many times. I think the phrasing "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again," implies more that an individual can receive it twice and doesn't emphasize the lack of a limit. What do you think? If it helps, I could reword it as "The same person".
  • Yes, you are right. Instead you can put "An individual who was previously awarded the prize can receive it again, multiple times," Here you are emphasizing the multiple times but not making the individual part any more unclear.
  • Going through this and different options I got from ChatGPT, I think this sounds the best: "Individuals may receive the prize more than once, provided that at least five years have passed since their last award and that they have made new outstanding achievements in cinematography since then." Also made a few minor edits in the other sentences. What do you think?
  • "to the award's committee" → "to the award committee" I have seen award committee used before, but never award's committee.
  • Done switched out all instances of it
  • "when the committee notifies the president of the chosen winner" was the system to choose president of a group explained previously? I might have missed it but it seems worth explaining.
  • president refers to the President of Ukraine, who is the one who officiates the award through a presidential decree as explained in the lead's first paragraph. I thought of restating that sentence from the first paragraph here but I thought it would be too redundant. What do you think?
  • Oh okay, yes I agree it would be too redundant. However, I was confused because it says "president of the chosen winner", so I thought that the group of winners elected their own president. I see the original meaning, to clarify can you put Ukrainian president or national president. Otherwise you can also distance the "president" from the "chosen winner". Example: "the president is then notified by the committee of the winner" but then it sounds like the winner has their own committee. Maybe you can add a comma?
  • After going through this and some ChatGPT rewordings, I went with this: "when the president receives the committee’s selection", which I think also ties in well since the part of the sentence just before it kind of defines selection with "selecting the final awardee(s)". What do you think? I definitely think this is an improvement from before to say the least
  • Love to see expansion of coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia, please ping me for further clarification or when the issues are resolved.
@Easternsahara: sorry for the second ping but I addressed all the follow-up replies and everything. The lead's gotten much better so many thanks for all the great suggestions! :) Let me know if it's better now and if there's anything else I can do or if you're ready to support. Dan the Animator 04:38, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the last response but yes, I support Easternsahara (talk) 23:39, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :) Dan the Animator 23:52, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from simongraham

edit

This looks a very compelling nomination. I will add some comments shortly. simongraham (talk) 03:52, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Simongraham it's been some time since your earlier message. No rush but maybe update your comment if you're no longer planning on leaving suggestions. Thanks! Dan the Animator 21:58, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead section provides an excellent overview of the prize, its history, and its importance in Ukrainian cinema. The use of English and Ukrainian sources is excellent as it provides a level of depth for the prize. The context is there, but the article could benefit from some further expansion to make it clearer why this prize is significant on a national and cultural level.
  • Thank you! :) For further expansion, what did you have in mind? Any specific questions/ideas? The lead already states that "[a]s a state award, the prize is the highest national recognition for cinema in Ukraine" but I sense your comment is about something more?
  • I suggest areas may include the significance of cinema in Ukraine, how Ukrainian cinema is seen globally, the coverage of the award in international media, whether the recipients go on to other awards, whether any of these have changed over time, and whether the fall of the Soviet Union or other geopolitical events have affected it. Much of this is likely to be in more general literature like Beumers's Directory of World Cinema[2] or Rollberg's Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Cinema[3]. I also note that there are prizes called the Dovzhenko Award[4] and the Dovzhenko Gold Medal[5] listed in some of the literature attached to some of the same people. Are they the same as this award?
  • Aware of the need for the article to be comprehensive, consider further explanation of how the prize compares to other national awards in Ukraine or the broader post-Soviet space. How does it compare? How is it unique?
  • Consider expanding why Oleksandr Dovzhenko was chosen to be honored and the importance of his centenary.
  • I would think the sentence "It is named after acclaimed Soviet Ukrainian film director and screenwriter Oleksandr Dovzhenko, who was among the world's top filmmakers and a major figure of the Soviet film industry." would be self-explanatory enough for why Dovzhenko was chosen though I could reword/add in more if it helps. The award was established together with various other establishments/events marking his centenary in a presidential decree that explained the reason simply as celebrating "the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the birth of the outstanding figure of Ukrainian culture Oleksandr Dovzhenko". Centenaries are generally one of the anniversaries that garner greater celebrations (i.e. 10th, 50th, 100th, etc. anniversaries are typically the main ones) and Dovzhenko was chosen simply because he is an "acclaimed...Ukrainian film director and screenwriter...who was among the world's top filmmakers and a major figure [in cinema overall]".
  • I understand, but feel that the sentence could be expanded to explain why he was chosen to be honored. Although the circumstances of the foundation are different, compare the detail provided in the History section in the Featured List on the Copley Medal with this article. There is an extensive the literature on Dovzhenko and his works[6] that may be able to provide background information.
  • Is there any detail on the selection process that can be added?
  • It depends, what details were you thinking? Are there any questions regarding this that the article leaves unanswered/ambiguous? The footnotes cover a lot of selection process specifics though there are additional details I left out that I could add in if they are beneficial
  • The footnotes are extremely valuable and well-researched. I feel much of their content could be integrated with the text as it is not "too detailed or awkward to be in the body of the article" (as per MOS:NOTES). In addition, if there is anything that compares the process to other similar schemes, I feel that would be advantageous to readers in helping contextualise the award.
  • Recommend using more secondary sources where possible as per WP:SECONDARY.
  • Consider including any controversies if attested in reputable media.
  • Suggest moving the content from footnote j to the main text and expanding it to a sourced discussion on the gaps in the award provision.
  • The lead already does touch on footnote j's content though I don't think merging the content in would be ideal. Earlier on, I put substantial effort into finding sources but for some reason, there are no online sources that explain the gaps in the award's provision (the closest I was able to find was a brief mention in a news article about the 2021 prize that simply says "As you know, last year [2020] the Dovzhenko Prize was not awarded, and in 2019 its laureate was film director Serhiy Loznytsia for creating the film "Donbas"."). I would think this is acceptable since this seems like a case of WP:OBV. Thus, given the lack of sources/explanation, I think the current format works best.
  • That is really interesting. I suggest it may be worth look at the articles in the Soviet literature like Sputnik[7] to see if there is anything. Incidentally, while I appreciate you point about it touching pn the content, I feel much of the detail in the footnote is relevant to the main body and is not "too detailed or awkward to be in the body of the article".
  • Recommend adding images of the recipients that have been most covered in the literature.
  • While the Rationale column does give some detail on the recipients, consider providing more detail on the more notable winners in the main text.

@Dantheanimator: I realise that this is not the most active page on wikipedia but hope my comments are useful. This is a very interesting article and I look forward to seeing how you progress it. simongraham (talk) 11:34, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in China

edit
Nominator(s): Tone 07:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, time for a big one. China has 60 World Heritage Sites and 61 tentative sites (these two numbers may change in the upcoming week since the UNESCO assembly is taking place but we'll update if needed). The list is therefore massive. And this is also the reason why the map this time is set a bit differently than usual, but I think it works fine. Otherwise, standard style. Do not get afraid of reviewing it, I believe it is a fascinating read. Tone 07:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

edit
Image review
edit
  • File:泰山 南天门.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:The Great Wall of China - Badaling.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Forbidden City Beijing (3019178959).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Jiucenglou of Mogao Caves.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Terracotta Army Pit 1 - 2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Zhoukoudian Entrance.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Huangshan-瀑布云 20141109.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:1 jiuzhaigou valley wu hua hai 2011b.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:1 huanglong pools aerial 2011.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Zhangjiajie National Forest Park 38021-Zhangjiajie (48757252178).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Putuo Zongcheng Temple.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Qufu Confucian Temple 49255-Qufu (49055650421).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Wudangshan pic 12.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Potala palace21.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Mount Lushan - fog.JPG - CC BY-SA 2.5
  • File:Leshan Buddha Statue View.JPG - CC BY-SA 2.5
  • File:1 lijiang old town 2012a.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:PingYaoCity.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Humble Administrator Garden 48396-Suzhou (49171766422).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Longevity Hill of the Summer Palace.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Temple of Heaven - Hall of Prayer for Good Harvests.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Wuyi Mountains Sea of clouds 4.jpg - CC BY 2.5 cn
  • File:Dazu-Baoding Shan-150-No5-2012-gje.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:青城山山门 01.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:HongCun AnHui.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:DragonGateCave2.jpg - CC BY 2.5
  • File:Nanjing Ming Xiaoling 2017.11.11 08-10-27.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:61292-Yungang-Grottoes (28498548881).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Tiger Leaping Gorge.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.5
  • File:Tomb of the General 1.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Ruínas de S. Paulo.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0 The uploader of these images seems to infringe on copyright quite frequently. This specific image seems fine but just noting that.
  • File:26245-Anyang (49086226266).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Panda Cub from Wolong, Sichuan, China.JPG - Public Domain
  • File:Zili Village 18622-Kaiping (49038394322).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:87471-Li-River (29881896297).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Snail pit tulou.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:19250-SanQingShan (39873732113).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:五台山塔院寺.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Shaolinsi.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:38997-Danxiashan (48988860616).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:西湖平湖秋月.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Maotianshania-cylindrica.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Yuan Shangdu.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Jengish Chokusu from BC.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Terrace field yunnan china edit.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Dayanta Gisela-Brantl 01.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:拱宸橋·浙江杭州·（航拍自東南往西北）.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:海龙屯 朝天关.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Rock painting hua mountain 1.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:VM 5331 Muyu town north.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Hoh Xil.jpg - CC BY 2.5 cn
  • File:Gulangyu.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:梵淨山紅雲金頂（新金頂）.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 This image looks very professional but it has somewhat low resolution
  • File:Liangzhu Ancient City Site, 2016-06-18 17.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Spoon-billed sandpiper.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:20230130 Old City of Quanzhou 01.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Soultea-Pu-erh-first-grade.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Bilutu Peak.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Central Axis of Beijing from Yongdingmenwai (20240812145818).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dongzhai Harbour Mangrove Forest.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 This image's resolution is horrible, please find something better. If you can not, then just remove it and leave the space blank.
  • File:China-Alligator.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:Birds on Poyang Lake (15273717673).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:RMB20dollarbackscene.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 Quality is bad, could you find a replacement? If not that is also fine, you can keep it if nothing better exists.
  • File:YumbuLhakhang.jpg - CC BY 2.5
  • File:Qutang Gorge on Changjiang.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Mount. Jinfo 1.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Xiaozhaitiankeng.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:1 mount hua shan china 2011.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:China2011 Zhejiang YandangShan.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:楠溪江最美丽的一段 - The Most Beautiful Section of Nanxi River - 2010.04 - panoramio.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Majishan entire hill 20090226.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Hornito in Wudalianchi 1, Aug 2019.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Pingtan Beach - panoramio.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:South Jade Cloud Road.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:水井街酒坊遗址照片.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Dangjiacun.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:City wall of Xi'an 51550-Xian (27959363326).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Five Pavilion Bridge and White Pagoda 2017.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Zhouzhuang 2.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Summer Vacation 2007, 263, Watchtower In The Morning Light, Dunhuang, Gansu Province.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Fenghuang Ancient Town.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Jade Burial Suit of Zhao Mo, King of Nanyue.jpg - CC0
  • File:白鹤梁石鱼.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Xijiang Qianhu Miaozhai.Skyline.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Turpan-karez-museo-d02.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.5 es
  • File:Liu Wang animals.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:The Songshan Buddhist Academy Lied in Mount Song.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Taklamakan desert.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:LakeKanas.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Tashkurgan River Delta Meadow.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Pagoda of Fogong Temple at Dust.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Neolithic jade dragon, Hongshan Culture, Inner Mongolia, 1971.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Yue-Kiln sites at Shanglin Lake, 2014-11-23 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:东百中心A馆10楼瞭望台西三坊七巷.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Xixia.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Chengyangqiao, Guangxi, China.jpg - CC BY 2.5 the copyright seems weird but the author hasn't been warned on Wikimedia for copyright infringement and is quite good at photography.
  • File:Lingqu Canal.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Danba diaolou.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Archaeological Site of Jinsha.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Yardangs in the Tsaidam Desert.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Dunhuang Yardang National Geopark 2.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Tianzhushan.JPG - Public Domain
  • File:革命圣地井冈山啊.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Jianmenguan.JPG - CC BY-SA 2.5
  • File:Tsaparang-ruins of ancient capital of Guge Kingdom 03.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:HulunLake2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Qinghai Lake May 2006.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Kailash north.JPG - CC BY 2.5
  • File:TaihangMountain8.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Baitou Mountain Tianchi.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Xinpusaurus-Tianjin Natural History Museum.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:HuangguoshuFall.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:五指山 - panoramio.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Landscape in Minqing from Hengfeng-Fuzhou Railway.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Molaire de Platybelodon grangeri.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Flickr image 29851221553.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • suitable alt text for all images
  • support, pass image review
  • I very much respect and appreciate Easternsahara’s contributions, but I disagree with his statement that the Mangrove image is so bad, it would be better to have no image. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:55, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Prose comments
edit
  • "It has featured in poems and paintings and has a school of painting named after it" → "It has featured in poems and paintings, having a school of paintings named after it" we don't want to have 2 ands in one sentence generally
  • "Of these, the most famous is the Terracotta Army (pictured), thousands of life-sized and realistic terracotta statues of warriors, as well as horses and chariots. " → "Of these, the most famous is the Terracotta Army (pictured). The Terracotta Army consists of thousands of life-sized, realistic statues of warriors, horses, and chariots." I thought that the wording was clunky and the sentence was a bit long
  • The defining feature of the landscape is the collection " → "a collection" I think a sounds more natural over the since the topic is only being introduced
  • "Qufu was the birthplace of Confucius, the great Chinese philosopher, educator, and politician, who died in the 5th century BCE." → "a great Chinese philospher," There are other great Chinese philosophers.
  • will add more comments
  • I think it is allowed but I just want to confirm, a lot of these comments about the World Heritage Sites are positive in nature rather than netural, has this been okay for other World Hertiage lists? I think so but idk about consensus, so I just want to clarify.

Dantheanimator

edit
  • I noticed there's no mention of Taiwan in the article and would assume it's because it's not a signatory of the convention but some explanation should still probably be added to the lead to clarify it, i.e. explain that since the end of the civil war, Taiwan has been disputed between the Taiwan-based ROC and mainland-based PRC, with both claiming the island as their own territory. Because of the One-China Policy and protests by the PRC, Taiwan has had limited representation in many international organizations and has been unable to join the convention. Also answering the questions: Why has the PRC been unable to add any sites for Taiwan? Has the PRC tried before? How did it go? What is the official UNESCO position? Has that position changed since the convention began? How are cultural heritage sites in/around Taiwan handled? What is Taiwan's position on the status of UNESCO sites in mainland China? Any other related information?
  • For the main map caption, mention that the disputed territories of Taiwan and claimed parts of Arunachal Pradesh are shown in dark tan and broken lines for claimed borders while the claimed borders in the disputed territories of the Kashmir region are shown with broken lines and map coloring there reflecting de facto territorial control
  • For the "Location (province)" column in both tables, for better accuracy, it should changed to "Location (prov. level)" or something similar, with prov. level/something similar being a abbr. template for "province-level" linking to Province-level divisions of China; a efn note along the lines of {{efn|The four types of administrative divisions in China at the provincial level, which is the [[Administrative divisions of China#Summary|highest order administrative division in the country]], are [[Provinces of China|provinces]] (23), [[Autonomous regions of China|autonomous regions]] (5), [[Municipalities of China|municipalities]] (4), and the two [[Special administrative regions of China|special administrative regions]] of [[Hong Kong]] and [[Macau]]. China's recognized World Heritage Sites as well as the sites on its tentative list are spread out across all of these administrative divisions except for the [[province of Taiwan]], which is [[Political status of Taiwan|disputed and currently controlled]] by the generally unrecognized [[Republic of China]].}} should also be added (I checked a bit and it looks like Taiwan is the only subdivision without any sites either on the WHS/tentative list but could use a second look and feel free to reword/reorganize this footnote too
  • Not as important but something I was curious, has any of China's WHS sites ever been listed on List of World Heritage in Danger? Maybe not so much for this list but it might make sense to include brief mentions of each country's previous site(s) inclusion on that list if applicable, when/how long they were on that list, and for what reasons they were listed and then removed
  • Also something else I was thinking might maybe make a good addition to the WHS lists in the lead is if all the WHS sites of that country are also simultaneously recognized as national heritage sites by that country's legislation (i.e. if that country also classifies WHS heritage sites as national protected areas/heritage sites). In the case of this list, something like "All of China's World Heritage Sites and sites on its tentative list are also simultaneously protected by the country's legislation as national priority protected sites for cultural sites and protected areas for natural sites."

@Tone: As always great work with continuing the WHS series and this list overall looks amazing! I have to admit I might end up using this when planning a future vacation ;) Dan the Animator 04:27, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment to add on to earlier suggestions, it might be worth also explaining what UNESCO's official position is on sites located in other disputed territories claimed by China but controlled by other countries. Taiwan should still have its own distinct, detailed mention given its unique case and Taiwan not being a party to the convention but other disputed territories should also be addressed if possible. Dan the Animator 21:59, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dantheanimator: Good comments! Yes, political issues here, but since this is a list of UNESCO sites and follows the official source, I would not want to go too much into details. I tend to keep the articles to the minimum in view of content, otherwise they quickly spiral to large lengths. List of sites, map, dates, endangered (if), shared sites, country serving on UNESCO Committee, that's more or less it. There are no sites and also no tentative sites in the disputed parts of the map. For example, the FLs for India and Venezuela do not mention details on the disputed areas either (and not sites in that area). I would consider adding a discussion in a situation similar to List of World Heritage Sites in Serbia, where the Medieval Monuments in Kosovo had been listed some years before Kosovo declared independence. The other specific situation is with the Old City of Jerusalem site, which was proposed by Jordan. There actually is a List of potential World Heritage Sites in Taiwan, but this list is not recognized by UNESCO because of the reasons you mention above. There is some discussion in that article but I'd prefer stronger sources. I changed the province-level, good suggestion. I think the link provides the required details. For the US list, I used state-level for ___location and footnotes for non-states, such as the unincorporated territories (Puerto Rico), but here the link makes perfect sense. As for the sites previously in danger, if I see correctly, China had none. Otherwise, I tend to include those details, as well as reasons why they were listed and removed from the endangered list. As for the national heritage, I don't know. Again, it seems going into details. There are two links in see also, maybe that part could be extended? --Tone 10:02, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I support Tone in ignoring the irrelevant details of disputed areas, changing provinces to province level subdivisions, etc. Much of the format could be understood if you looked at other FLs on World Heritage Sites. Easternsahara (talk) 00:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Tone: for the comprehensive reply and apologies for the late follow-up. About the suggestions:
  • I agree with keeping details to a minimum and in the case of this article, I also agree adding the List of potential World Heritage Sites in Taiwan link to the See also section would be a great idea.
  • For disputed areas, I think it should be fine if there is no mention in the article/lead. That said, for the map caption, given the map uses different shading/lines, it should be mentioned (maybe add to the caption something along the lines of Disputed territories of China are shaded tan while claimed borders are shown with dashed lines; there are no sites located in disputed areas.). I think adding something similar to the map captions on the India, Pakistan, Venezuela, Israel, Palestine, Cyprus, Sudan, Syria, Russia would also be helpful since the maps used in all those articles also all use unique shading/lines to indicate disputed territories/borders, which should be clarified in the map captions imo. Also, in the case of List of World Heritage Sites in Morocco, the caption should also mention that Western Sahara is not shown, with the dashed line representing the border claimed by Western Sahara.
  • I won't oppose here regarding this since it is mostly about the WHS Morocco list but I think it would be good to consider: in the case of this list, there thankfully is the Taiwan list which would be an ideal ___location for the information but in other cases, there doesn't seem to be any findable places for information about the WHS status of disputed regions. In Morocco's case, List of World Heritage Sites in Morocco, List of World Heritage Sites in Africa, List of World Heritage Sites in North Africa, and World Heritage Sites by country all make no explanation of the status of Western Sahara in regards to the WHS Convention and their sites. Overall, I couldn't find any article on the English Wikipedia that discusses the WHS status of Western Sahara though it's possible I could have missed it. Personally I think a lot of readers searching for information about the WH sites/status of disputed territories will naturally go to the article or articles of the territories' claimants so having some sort of information on those articles to explain the situation or direct them to some other article where it is explained would be ideal but in any case worth considering this more imo in future/past WHS lists.
  • Also, for province-level and administrative divisions in general, yup that works. I wasn't sure what would be best but you're right, the Wikilink to the province-level article fits perfectly. I think the way the US list was done also works great too though I agree the province-level link is good enough for this list

Dan the Animator 03:03, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tone it's been roughly a month since the earlier replies/comments. Hope all's well and let me know if I can help with finishing this nom. Dan the Animator 18:59, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, yes, I was busy, I hope I get to work on this soon properly. Tone 05:34, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, take your time. :) Wanted to check just in case. Dan the Animator 20:01, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alavense

edit
  • Of these 60 sites, 41 are listed for their cultural, 15 for their natural, and four sites for both cultural and natural significance - Make it 4 sites, so that it complies with MOS:NUMNOTES: "Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently".
  • One site is transnational, the Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor is shared with Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan - I feel something's missing there. Maybe One site is transnational, as the Silk Roads: the Routes Network of Chang'an-Tianshan Corridor is shared with Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
  • under the Emperor Qin Shi Huang who connected earlier existing sections -> under the Emperor Qin Shi Huang, who connected earlier existing sections
  • Three sections of the wall are listed, the terminuses at Jiayuguan City and Shanhai Pass, and the Badaling section (pictured) near Beijing -> Three sections of the wall are listed: the terminuses at Jiayuguan City and Shanhai Pass, and the Badaling section (pictured) near Beijing
  • In the 19th century, the caves were occupied by Buddhist monks while they drew the attention of archeologists and were protected after 1930 - When did they draw attention? I don't think that's clear.
  • a rich assemblies
  • in nine different architectural style
  • in history of Chinese civil engineering - A the is missing here.
  • in a particular local architecture, urban planning, and traditions - Given that it's not singular, you should lose the a.
  • with waters from the mountains being collected in the Black Dragon Pool and are then distributed through a series of canals and channels - Something is not working there.
  • Both are important due of their architecture and art collections
  • Out of more than 50 such gardens in the city, four were listed in 1997, and a further five were added in 2000 - Make it fifty.
  • damaged in during
  • largest largely
  • that has by now largely disappeared - The by now is not needed.
  • alpine karst and danxia landforms - The Oxford comma is missing there before the and.
  • the area a biodiversity hotspot
  • The Koguryo, or Goguryeo kingdom ruled - You have to either add or remove a comma here.
  • during the early and middle period - periods?
  • They originate in the time of the Ming dynasty when they served -> They originate in the time of the Ming dynasty, when they served
  • Additional four clusters - Four additional clusters?
  • is a type of a large earthen buildings -> is a type of large earthen buildings
  • of south-eastern China where - Add a comma.
  • The characteristic feature are - features?
  • (23,000 ft) (Jengish Chokusu - Those parentheses all together read a bit weird. Can the mention about the picture be made a bit later, in the following sentence?
  • They use ... that uses - That could read better. Maybe that relies on in the second half?
  • The Hani worship the nature and their land - Add a comma before and.
  • World Heritage site - This is the only instance I could find where site is not written with a capital S.
  • 33 sites on the roads are listed, 19 of which are in China - Something like Of 33 sites on the roads listed, 19 are in China to avoid beginning the sentence with a figure?
  • The canal was constructed in stages, with the first ones dating to the 5th century BCE and it got fully connected - The canal was constructed in stages, with the first ones dating to the 5th century BCE, and it got fully connected
  • materials, allowed distribution -> materials, and allowed distribution
  • A total of 31 sites along the canal are listed, the Gongchen Bridge in Hangzhou is pictured -> A total of 31 sites along the canal are listed. The Gongchen Bridge in Hangzhou is pictured
  • from 5th to 2nd century BCE -> from the 5th to the 2nd century BCE
  • of the bronze drum culture, a culture once widespread in the region - It's already been stated that it is a culture, so maybe of the bronze drum culture, once widespread in the region?
  • in the fusion traditional - of?
  • You have both Overseas Chinese and vverseas Chinese.
  • The serial site comprises 12 components with wetlands, mudflats, beaches, and marshes, that were - Lose the comma before that were.
  • Jingmai Mountain (景迈山) - That's the first time you have the name in Chinese.
  • The Western Xia or the Tangut civilization existed from 1038 to 1227 when -> The Western Xia or the Tangut civilization existed from 1038 to 1227, when

I hope those suggestions will be helpful. I will carry on with the tentative list as soon as I have time. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 19:24, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for removal

edit
Ancillary TV season block nominations

The following nominations do not require comments, but are included for bookkeeping purposes. The discussion of each TV season list takes place at the respective "season 1" nomination below.

The Simpsons season 14

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:45, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 13

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 10

edit
Notified: Theleftorium, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 9

edit
Notified: Xihix, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:43, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 8

edit
Notified: Maitch, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:42, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 7

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 6

edit
Notified: Gran2, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 5

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 4

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 3

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 2

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

The discussion for this nomination is happening here. Do not leave comments on this page. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:38, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Desperate Housewives season 1

edit

Due to the consensus against "Episodes in a season" being a list or being nominated for featured list status, I am nominating this for deletion. The article itself seems to be in good shape, but that is irrelevant and thus I have not checked it for comprehensiveness. I decided to nominate this to speed up the process of delisting all the 'season' lists, thanks. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 00:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of winners of the Chicago Marathon

edit
Notified: TonyTheTiger, MrLinkinPark333, KyuuA4, WikiProject Athletics, WikiProject Chicago, WikiProject Running, WikiProject Illinois

I am nominating this for featured list removal because the lead and summary table are not up to date, not all information in the tables is sourced, the manual of style for tables and images is not followed, and the images could be improved. In October 2023, I had first mentioned these issues on the talk page. In January 2024, I had also added clean-up templates on the list itself. Some information has been updated since, but many of the issues with this list still remain, here per section:

Lead
  • Winner counts don't match Country summary table
  • Image doesn't have an alt text (MOS:ACCIM)
  • The photo of Khalid Khannouchi was taken during another marathon (New York City)
History
  • The section heading seems unnecessary, could be merged with the lead
Winners
  • Not all table rows have source references
  • Images don't have alt texts (MOS:ACCIM)
  • Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
  • Table doesn't have row headers
  • Only photos of male competitors, none of female or wheelchair competitors
  • The photos are not in chronological order like the table they accompany
  • The photo of Robert Kipkoech Cheruiyot was taken during another marathon (Boston)
  • The photo of Felix Limo was taken during another marathon (London)
  • The image caption for the photo Robert Kipkoech Cheruiyot doesn't match the description on Wikimedia Commons
Wheelchair division
  • Not all table rows have source references
  • The table doesn't have a legend for the green color
  • The table uses only color as marker (MOS:COLOR)
  • Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
  • Table doesn't have row headers
Country summary
  • Count doesn't match Winners and Wheelchair division tables
  • Table doesn't have a caption (MOS:DTAB)
  • Table doesn't have row headers

– Editør (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • A lot of this formatting could be pretty easy to fix. I've already taken care of the row headers, and I can work on a lot of the other issues. For sourcing, the current ref. 17 could be used for a lot of the winners (there are probably other sources compiling winners out there that are more up-to-date). Regarding images taken during other marathons... photos from Chicago would be preferred, but I think it's fine to use pictures from other races for particularly relevant individuals without pics in Chicago (in the same way that, say, we might include pictures of Academy Awards winners from other events). RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:04, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You've made a good start with the headers.
    That reference number 17 is a primary source. It is my understanding that secondary sources are preferred for a featured list and for this particular marathon I expect that those are available.
    After a quick look at commons:Category:Chicago Marathon, I don't think photos from other marathons are needed, but if they are used, this should ideally become clear from the caption. – Editør (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed the counts in the wheelchair and total columns. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    When counting the 1995 men's wheelchair winners each as 0.5, I think the number of United States men's wheelchair wins is 23 not 25. When counting them as 1 each, it would still only be 24. And I don't understand the ordering of the Country summary table, none of the columns seems ordered on loading the page. – Editør (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Changed 25 to 24. I don't know if it should be halves or not for 95. Might be easier to sort by total winners. If there's a tie, then the countries could be ABC order. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    As an example: in the article 2024 European Athletics Championships, the Medal table ranks by number of medals, there two winners would be 2, but the Placing table ranks by number of points, there two winners would be 1. I think the Country summary should follow whichever is closer in purpose for this list.
    The running and wheelchair races seem so different that ranking the wins for both of them in one table seems slightly odd to me. However, this list is about both, so there is something to say for having one summary table and not two. Either choice seems fine to me when there's solid reasoning behind it. Does it make sense that Switzerland ranks third overall when they have zero wins in the running race but eleven in the wheelchair race?
    The different categories have different winner totals, so maybe each column should also have a cell with the total at the bottom (probably in a row fixed at the bottom). These different totals may also influence the choice for having a combined table for running and wheelchair or not. – Editør (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the countries should be rearranged by total wins after all 4 events. The first 5 countries in the table are out of order. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Total wins is only the first column to order the list by. When multiple countries have the same total, they should probably be sorted by alphabet, which means the countries with one winner are also out of order. – Editør (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And I think the Country summary table headers should be consistent with the rest of the article, so all Male/Female or all Men's/Women's. –Editør (talk) 21:26, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons season 1

edit
Notified: Scorpion0422, WikiProject Television, WikiProject Animation, WikiProject Comedy

This nomination is part of the ongoing effort to move all season FLs to the GA/FA track (see here for more). It covers all seasons of The Simpsons that are FLs: seasons 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, and 14. The nomination is primarily for procedural reasons, but many of these FLs are 15+ years old and could use updates to meet modern quality standards.

As a note, all of these seasons except 14 are currently the primary articles for good topics; those good topics would also be delisted if the season articles are not brought back to GAN/FAC. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist per consensus 🇪🇭 Easternsahara U T C 01:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist aside from the FL to FA thing, quite a few of these articles, particularly season 1, are not up to FA quality Crystal Drawers (talk) 17:40, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, this is not a proposal to reclassify any of these as GAs or FAs, merely to move them out of FL and affirm that any future promotions would be at GAN/FAC. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:00, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per project consensus. Alavense (talk) 09:59, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates&oldid=1308021634"