Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material classification

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 06:16, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

The informative content of any potential article is covered elsewhere (excepting Chlorinated, Oxidized, and Cyclized rubber; if they are in my Inorganic text, I can create at least stubs for those articles), so nothing is gained by aggregating here. Also, the pagetitle is misleading - a systematic list of every characterization and classification technique for every possible material would be completely untenable and not even all that useful. Also also, this reads like something jotted on a large palm before a test. Eldereft 22:03, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this steaming pile of gobbledy-goop. It is virtually incomprehensible and it would take a materials scientist to make some sense of it. Better just to start over. — RJH 15:38, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• I concur. There's nothing here worth saving. Delete. --Polynova 19:01, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per Eldereft. --Howcheng 19:03, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - DavidWBrooks 14:03, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.