Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Updation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Dunc|☺ 18:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WINAD. Dicdef neologism without possibility of expansion. Delete. Dmcdevit 4 July 2005 05:13 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism. Fernando Rizo 4 July 2005 05:35 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 4 July 2005 05:40 (UTC)
• Strong Delete-- Bad neologism. --WCFrancis 4 July 2005 05:55 (UTC)

Additional Comment -- even if it were a good word, it would only be a candidate for a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. -- WCFrancis 4 July 2005 05:57 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologist dicdef. Use the noun form of update. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 07:44 (UTC)
• Delete - dicdef JoJan 4 July 2005 07:54 (UTC)
• Delete dicdef. - Mgm|^(talk) July 4, 2005 10:27 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly redir to Update. Radiant_>|< July 4, 2005 11:42 (UTC)
• Delete: neologism, WP is not a slang guide --IByte 4 July 2005 12:53 (UTC)
• Deletion, WP not a repository for made-up words. -Splash July 4, 2005 13:08 (UTC)
• Delete I agree with all the above. Oliver Keenan July 4, 2005 19:06 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.