Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mining
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Mining and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 8. |
More for The Doe Run Company
editHello! I'm an employee of The Doe Run Company and I'm here as a representative of the company, per my last message at this WikiProject. Continuing my work to update the company's Wikipedia article, I have saved an expanded and updated draft here, and posted an edit request on the article's talk page. My goals are to correct factual inaccuracies, source all content, and provide a more thorough overview of the company's operations, among others outlined in more detail in the edit request. Would someone from this page be able to give this a look over? TS at Doe Run (talk)
Uranium mining in the Bancroft area needs probably one more source assessment at Featured Article Candidates. If anyone is willing to assess the article, it would be helpful.
Link: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Uranium mining in the Bancroft area/archive1 CT55555(talk) 14:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Slate Islands#Requested move 14 July 2024
edit
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Slate Islands#Requested move 14 July 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Input please on Polymetallic ore
editThe page Polymetallic ore has been restored after an RfC about it. I have done some editing which I think is about OK, but as I am not an expert in either mining or geology I might not have included the right refs, there could be things missing or mistakes. I would appreciate expert input from those of you who know more. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:46, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
FAR for Tumbler Ridge
editI have nominated Tumbler Ridge for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I have noticed that there are a few articles on similar mining and refining-related topics with different names and somewhat similar scopes (e.g. nickel mine vs iron mine redirecting to iron ore vs copper mine redirecting to copper extraction), and wonder if a bit more uniformity would be a useful cleanup. I put the discussion on WT:CHEM but I suspect it's worth linking it here: WT:CHEM#Uniform approach to extraction and refining of industrial metals. Thank you! Fishsicles (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Copper has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
New stub template
editHi all - I've just created and added a new template for articles on people heavily connected with mining who wouldn't qualify as geologists. {{Mining-bio-stub}} will place articles in Category:Mining people stubs a subcategory of Category:Mining stubs, and can be used for miners, mining engineers, mine owners, and the like. Grutness...wha? 06:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)