Content deleted Content added
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 763:
== Decision Concerning Copyright Challenge ==
Per copyright clerk, 24 August 2025, the article has {{tq|'''no copyright infrignment'''}}. Code examples used in the article are also "too short and too functional to be considered a copyright violation". Original statement can be read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2025_July_15?markasread=338948454&markasreadwiki=enwiki#15_July_2025 here]. Additionally, the license statement placed under references by the copyright clerk should not be removed, unless under their [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:
== Valid Criticism is NEVER Vandalism ==
Please, [[Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith| assume good faith]]!
Wukuendo has repeatedly tried to assert that criticism against the language is vandalism, which is not the case! This is very clearly an attempt at white-washing the image of the language.
I have tried to add a maximally unbiased critique of the language, as inspired by the [[Java (programming language)]] article, citing very popular articles by developers. Vlang, like any project, has its own fair share of problems with the language and community, as has been noted by not only just one source, but multiple.
I ensured that my paragraph cited not only one source, but rather various. I ensured that the paragraph also highlighted that the project is still in beta, and thus it is natural to have some problems.
User '''Wukuendo''' in specific has repeatedly tried to highlight any critique against the language as "'''vandalism'''" and "'''scandalmongering'''", when it is merely a lens into the reality of the language. They have repeatedly tried to "warn" me that I will be ''blocked'' from Wikipedia for this alleged vandalism. When asked on how this is vandalism, they have not responded.
I don't want to throw any accusations against anyone, but rejecting any valid criticism of a project as vandalism is very suspicious of [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]]. They do not [[Wikipedia:Ownership of content|own]] this article. Stop trying to edit-war! [[User:MapleTheColor|MapleTheColor]] ([[User talk:MapleTheColor|talk]]) 06:53, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
:To be more specific:
:# They have accused me of vandalism: Which is clearly wrong! This is not a case of vandalism, I am merely adding unbiased content to an article
:# They have accused me of adding original research: I have not added any of my own original research. I have only cited verifiable and legitimate research performed by others.
:# They have accused me of citing anonymous bloggers: All authors of the articles I have cited used their own name, and neither are they "unknown"! These articles have been shared hundreds of times across many different forums.
:Who else but developers would critique a programming language? [[User:MapleTheColor|MapleTheColor]] ([[User talk:MapleTheColor|talk]]) 07:03, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
| |||