CALIOP polluted continental/elevated smoke and height
CALIOP polluted continental/elevated smoke and height
Hello again,
I have a question regarding some of my observations using the L3 CALIOP tropospheric profile all-sky dataset, V4.20/21. In reading about the V4 scene classification algorithm (https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/ ... 7-2018.pdf) it seems like it should be impossible for the SCA to type an aerosol as "elevated smoke" if it occurs below 2.5 km, and impossible for a layer to be typed as "polluted continental" if it occurs above 2.5 km. However, when plotting vertical profiles of the extinction coefficients for different aerosol types, I see that in some areas (e.g., Eastern China) there can be extinction coefficients as high as ~.03 km^-1 for elevated smoke that occur below the 2.5 km threshold.
I am not sure if there are more recent updates to the SCA than were mentioned in the 2018 Kim et al paper, but I was wondering if someone could help reconcile this observation with what I'm reading about the SCA.
Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide!
I have a question regarding some of my observations using the L3 CALIOP tropospheric profile all-sky dataset, V4.20/21. In reading about the V4 scene classification algorithm (https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/ ... 7-2018.pdf) it seems like it should be impossible for the SCA to type an aerosol as "elevated smoke" if it occurs below 2.5 km, and impossible for a layer to be typed as "polluted continental" if it occurs above 2.5 km. However, when plotting vertical profiles of the extinction coefficients for different aerosol types, I see that in some areas (e.g., Eastern China) there can be extinction coefficients as high as ~.03 km^-1 for elevated smoke that occur below the 2.5 km threshold.
I am not sure if there are more recent updates to the SCA than were mentioned in the 2018 Kim et al paper, but I was wondering if someone could help reconcile this observation with what I'm reading about the SCA.
Thanks in advance for any insight you can provide!
Hi Sarah,
You are exactly right. Because the layer top altitude is evaluated to determine when smoke is injected above 2.5 km (a rough approximation for the boundary layer), it is possible for the lower portion of these smoke layers to exist below 2.5 km.
Best regards,
Jason Tackett
Go to full postYou are exactly right. Because the layer top altitude is evaluated to determine when smoke is injected above 2.5 km (a rough approximation for the boundary layer), it is possible for the lower portion of these smoke layers to exist below 2.5 km.
Best regards,
Jason Tackett
Filters:
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:14 am America/New_York
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: CALIOP polluted continental/elevated smoke and height
Thank you for your question. A Subject Matter Expert has been notified and will answer your question shortly. Please stand by!
Re: CALIOP polluted continental/elevated smoke and height
Hi there,
I answered my own question by realizing that it is only the top of the layer has to be above the 2.5 km threshold for the SCA to classify the entire layer as elevated smoke, which is why there is elevated smoke below 2.5 km. Thank you for your help!
Best,
Sarah
I answered my own question by realizing that it is only the top of the layer has to be above the 2.5 km threshold for the SCA to classify the entire layer as elevated smoke, which is why there is elevated smoke below 2.5 km. Thank you for your help!
Best,
Sarah
Re: CALIOP polluted continental/elevated smoke and height
Hi Sarah,
You are exactly right. Because the layer top altitude is evaluated to determine when smoke is injected above 2.5 km (a rough approximation for the boundary layer), it is possible for the lower portion of these smoke layers to exist below 2.5 km.
Best regards,
Jason Tackett
You are exactly right. Because the layer top altitude is evaluated to determine when smoke is injected above 2.5 km (a rough approximation for the boundary layer), it is possible for the lower portion of these smoke layers to exist below 2.5 km.
Best regards,
Jason Tackett