Hi there,
This is Md Rony Golder, PhD student of Curtin University. I am writing to you to know that---
Is NASA MODIS Aqua Chl-a algorithm (global image, l3 data) applicable for the Southern Ocean?
The literature says that We still say that NASA satellite algorithms under-estimate chlorophyll in the Southern Ocean. What is your point of view on this statement?
I am waiting for your reply.
Question related to Chl-a Algorithm
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:58 am America/New_York
-
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 6:15 pm America/New_York
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Question related to Chl-a Algorithm
Quite the loaded question
The Southern Ocean is big and most of it is quite far from civilization. This makes obtaining in situ validation data a challenge to say the least. As a result, the spatial and temporal sampling is rather skewed and probably not applicable to the entire Southern Ocean. That said, a (relatively) recent publication suggests that our data are quite applicable and validate well in the Southern Ocean: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151793
They report a difference between fluorometric and HPLC-derived estimates, the later comparing well with our satellite estimates. They posit that the fluorometrically-derived in situ chlorophyll concentrations are overestimated due to an overlap of the chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-c emission spectra (so, it's the in situ data that are overestimated, not the satellite data underestimating chlorophyll).
Sean

The Southern Ocean is big and most of it is quite far from civilization. This makes obtaining in situ validation data a challenge to say the least. As a result, the spatial and temporal sampling is rather skewed and probably not applicable to the entire Southern Ocean. That said, a (relatively) recent publication suggests that our data are quite applicable and validate well in the Southern Ocean: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151793
They report a difference between fluorometric and HPLC-derived estimates, the later comparing well with our satellite estimates. They posit that the fluorometrically-derived in situ chlorophyll concentrations are overestimated due to an overlap of the chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-c emission spectra (so, it's the in situ data that are overestimated, not the satellite data underestimating chlorophyll).
Sean
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2021 7:58 am America/New_York