Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfer Syntax Notation One: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
||
Line 12:
As far as I can tell, this "standard" has been created by a single vendor, and is only used in their products. No evidence has been provided that this is anything other than an advertisement. The article tries to draw a comparison with ASN.1, but the fact is that ASN.1 is a heavily used international standard, whereas this, as far as I can tell, is something that a single company has invented, and no one is using it save them and their customers. [[User:SJK|SJK]] ([[User talk:SJK|talk]]) 14:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
:'''delete''' Seems to be non-notable. Google search only returns two hits (apart from relating to our article), from protomatics (the creator, I assume), and a patent for it. No hits on google news, or the google blog search, or google groups. These are all for "Transfer Syntax Notation One". "TSN-1" doesn't seem to return anything relevant either. [[User:Silverfish|Silverfish]] ([[User talk:Silverfish|talk]]) 16:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Fabrictramp|<
*'''Delete''' unless reliably sourced to a standards organization--even a proposal or draft form would be acceptable. [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 22:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
|