Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transfer Syntax Notation One
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 21:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Transfer Syntax Notation One (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
As far as I can tell, this "standard" has been created by a single vendor, and is only used in their products. No evidence has been provided that this is anything other than an advertisement. The article tries to draw a comparison with ASN.1, but the fact is that ASN.1 is a heavily used international standard, whereas this, as far as I can tell, is something that a single company has invented, and no one is using it save them and their customers. SJK (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Seems to be non-notable. Google search only returns two hits (apart from relating to our article), from protomatics (the creator, I assume), and a patent for it. No hits on google news, or the google blog search, or google groups. These are all for "Transfer Syntax Notation One". "TSN-1" doesn't seem to return anything relevant either. Silverfish (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliably sourced to a standards organization--even a proposal or draft form would be acceptable. Jclemens (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.