Content deleted Content added
m Open access bot: url-access=subscription updated in citation with #oabot. |
→See also: add history of supercomputing as a naturally-obvious crossref Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 113:
[[File:Z3 Deutsches Museum.JPG|thumb|left|Replica of [[Konrad Zuse|Zuse]]'s [[Z3 (computer)|Z3]], the first fully automatic, digital (electromechanical) computer]]
In 1941, Zuse followed his earlier machine up with the [[Z3 (computer)|Z3]],<ref name="Part 4 Zuse"/> the world's first working [[electromechanical]] [[Computer programming|programmable]], fully automatic digital computer.<ref>{{cite news|title=A Computer Pioneer Rediscovered, 50 Years On |newspaper=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/20/news/20iht-zuse.html |date=20 April 1994 |access-date=2017-02-16 |archive-date=2016-11-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161104051054/http://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/20/news/20iht-zuse.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The Z3 was built with 2000 [[relay]]s, implementing a 22-[[bit]] [[Word (computer architecture)|word length]] that operated at a [[clock rate|clock frequency]] of about 5–10 [[Hertz|Hz]].{{sfn|Zuse|1993|p=55}} Program code and data were stored on punched [[celluloid|film]]. It was quite similar to modern machines in some respects, pioneering numerous advances such as [[floating-point arithmetic|floating-point numbers]]. Replacement of the hard-to-implement decimal system (used in [[Charles Babbage]]'s earlier design) by the simpler [[binary number|binary]] system meant that Zuse's machines were easier to build and potentially more reliable, given the technologies available at that time.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.crash-it.com/crash/index.php?page=73 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080318184915/http://www.crash-it.com/crash/index.php?page=73 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2008-03-18 |title=Zuse |work=Crash! The Story of IT}}</ref>
Zuse suffered setbacks during World War II when some of his machines were destroyed in the course of [[Allies of World War II|Allied]] bombing campaigns. Apparently his work remained largely unknown to engineers in the UK and US until much later, although at least IBM was aware of it as it financed his post-war startup company in 1946 in return for an option on Zuse's patents.
Line 208:
In October 1947, the directors of [[J. Lyons and Co.|J. Lyons & Company]], a British catering company famous for its teashops but with strong interests in new office management techniques, decided to take an active role in promoting the commercial development of computers. The [[LEO computer|LEO I]] computer (Lyons Electronic Office) became operational in April 1951<ref>{{cite web | last = Lavington | first = Simon | title = A brief history of British computers: the first 25 years (1948–1973). | publisher = [[British Computer Society]] | url = http://www.bcs.org/server.php? | access-date = 10 January 2010 | archive-date = 2010-07-05 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100705050757/http://www.bcs.org/server.php | url-status = dead }}</ref> and ran the world's first regular routine office computer [[job (software)|job]]. On 17 November 1951, the J. Lyons company began weekly operation of a bakery valuations job on the LEO – the first business [[:Category:Application software|application]] to go live on a stored-program computer.{{efn|{{harvnb|Martin|2008|p=24}} notes that [[David Caminer]] (1915–2008) served as the first corporate electronic systems analyst, for this first business computer system. LEO would calculate an employee's pay, handle billing, and other office automation tasks.}}
In June 1951, the [[UNIVAC I]] (Universal Automatic Computer) was delivered to the [[United States Census Bureau|U.S. Census Bureau]]. Remington Rand eventually sold 46 machines at more than {{US$|1 million}} each (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|1000000|1951|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{
In 1952, [[Groupe Bull|Compagnie des Machines Bull]] released the [[Bull Gamma 3|Gamma 3]] computer, which became a large success in Europe, eventually selling more than 1,200 units, and the first computer produced in more than 1,000 units.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Leclerc |first=Bruno |date=January 1990 |title=From Gamma 2 to Gamma E.T.: The Birth of Electronic Computing at Bull
[[File:IBM-650-panel.jpg|thumb|right|Front panel of the [[IBM 650]] ]]
Compared to the UNIVAC, IBM introduced a smaller, more affordable computer in 1954 that proved very popular.{{efn|For example, Kara Platoni's article on [[Donald Knuth]] stated that "there was something special about the IBM 650".<ref>{{cite magazine |first=Kara |last=Platoni |title=Love at First Byte |magazine=Stanford Magazine |url=https://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2006/mayjun/features/knuth.html |date=May–June 2006 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060925022700/http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2006/mayjun/features/knuth.html |archive-date=2006-09-25 |url-status=dead}}</ref>}}<ref>
V. M. Wolontis (18 August 1955) "A Complete Floating-Decimal Interpretive System for the I.B.M. 650 Magnetic Drum Calculator—Case 20878" Bell Telephone Laboratories Technical Memorandum MM-114-37, Reported in IBM Technical Newsletter No. 11, March 1956, as referenced in {{cite journal |title=Wolontis-Bell Interpreter |publisher=IEEE |journal=Annals of the History of Computing |volume=8 |issue=1 |date=January–March 1986 |pages=74–76 |doi=10.1109/MAHC.1986.10008 |s2cid=36692260}}
</ref> The [[IBM 650]] weighed over {{val|900|u=kg}}, the attached power supply weighed around {{val|1350|u=kg}} and both were held in separate cabinets of roughly 1.5{{times}}0.9{{times}}{{val|1.8|u=meters}}. The system cost {{US$|500000}}<ref>{{cite book |last=Dudley |first=Leonard |title=Information Revolution in the History of the West |year=2008 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=jLnPi5aYoJUC&pg=PA266 |isbn=978-1-84720-790-6 |publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing |page=266 |access-date=2020-08-30}}</ref> (${{Formatprice|{{Inflation|US|500000|1954|r=-4}}|0}} as of {{
===Microprogramming===
Line 276:
At the [[University of Manchester]], a team under the leadership of [[Tom Kilburn]] designed and built a machine using the newly developed [[transistor]]s instead of valves. Initially the only devices available were [[germanium]] [[point-contact transistor]]s, less reliable than the valves they replaced but which consumed far less power.{{sfn|Lavington|1998|pp=34–35}} Their first [[transistor computer|transistorized computer]], and the first in the world, was [[Manchester computers#Transistor Computer|operational by 1953]],{{sfn|Lavington|1998|p=37}} and a second version was completed there in April 1955.{{sfn|Lavington|1998|p=37}} The 1955 version used 200 transistors, 1,300 [[Solid-state electronics|solid-state]] [[diode]]s, and had a power consumption of 150 watts. However, the machine did make use of valves to generate its 125 kHz clock waveforms and in the circuitry to read and write on its magnetic drum memory, so it was not the first completely transistorized computer.
That distinction goes to the [[Harwell CADET]] of 1955,<ref name="ieeexplore.ieee"/> built by the electronics division of the [[Atomic Energy Research Establishment]] at [[Harwell, Oxfordshire|Harwell]]. The design featured a 64-kilobyte magnetic drum memory store with multiple moving heads that had been designed at the [[National Physical Laboratory (United Kingdom)|National Physical Laboratory, UK]]. By 1953 this team had transistor circuits operating to read and write on a smaller magnetic drum from the [[Royal Radar Establishment]]. The machine used a low clock speed of only 58 kHz to avoid having to use any valves to generate the clock waveforms.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cooke-Yarborough |first=E.H. |title=Introduction to Transistor Circuits |publisher=Oliver and Boyd |year=1957 |___location=Edinburgh}}</ref><ref name="ieeexplore.ieee">{{cite journal| title=Some early transistor applications in the UK| journal=Engineering Science & Education Journal| volume=7| issue=3| pages=100–106| year=1998| last1=Cooke-Yarborough| first1=E.H.| doi=10.1049/esej:19980301| doi-broken-date=
CADET used 324-point-contact transistors provided by the UK company [[Standard Telephones and Cables]]; 76 [[Bipolar junction transistor|junction transistor]]s were used for the first stage amplifiers for data read from the drum, since point-contact transistors were too noisy. From August 1956, CADET was offering a regular computing service, during which it often executed continuous computing runs of 80 hours or more.<ref>{{cite book |last=Lavington |first=Simon |title=Early British Computers |publisher=Manchester University Press |year=1980 |url=https://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/EarlyBritish-05-12.html#Ch-09 |isbn=0-7190-0803-4 |access-date=2014-01-07 |archive-date=2019-05-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190524164254/http://ed-thelen.org/comp-hist/EarlyBritish-05-12.html#Ch-09 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |doi= 10.1049/pi-b-1.1956.0076 |title=A transistor digital computer |journal=Proceedings of the IEE - Part B: Radio and Electronic Engineering |volume=103 |issue=3S |pages=364–370 |year=1956 |last1=Cooke-Yarborough |first1=E.H. |last2= Barnes |first2=R.C.M. |last3=Stephen |first3=J.H. |last4=Howells |first4=G.A.}}</ref> Problems with the reliability of early batches of point contact and alloyed junction transistors meant that the machine's [[mean time between failures]] was about 90 minutes, but this improved once the more reliable [[bipolar junction transistor]]s became available.{{sfn|Lavington|1998|pp=36–37}}
Line 330:
From 1975 to 1977, most microcomputers, such as the [[KIM-1|MOS Technology KIM-1]], the [[Altair 8800]], and some versions of the [[Apple I]], were sold as kits for do-it-yourselfers. Pre-assembled systems did not gain much ground until 1977, with the introduction of the [[Apple II]], the Tandy [[TRS-80]], the first [[SWTPC]] computers, and the [[Commodore PET]]. Computing has evolved with microcomputer architectures, with features added from their larger brethren, now dominant in most market segments.
A NeXT Computer and its [[Object-oriented programming|object-oriented]] development tools and libraries were used by [[Tim Berners-Lee]] and [[Robert Cailliau]] at [[CERN]] to develop the world's first [[web server]] software, [[CERN httpd]], and also used to write the first [[web browser]], [[WorldWideWeb]].
Systems as complicated as computers require very high [[reliability engineering|reliability]]. ENIAC remained on, in continuous operation from 1947 to 1955, for eight years before being shut down. Although a vacuum tube might fail, it would be replaced without bringing down the system. By the simple strategy of never shutting down ENIAC, the failures were dramatically reduced. The vacuum-tube [[Semi-Automatic Ground Environment|SAGE]] air-defense computers became remarkably reliable – installed in pairs, one off-line, tubes likely to fail did so when the computer was intentionally run at reduced power to find them. [[Hot plugging|Hot-pluggable]] hard disks, like the hot-pluggable vacuum tubes of yesteryear, continue the tradition of repair during continuous operation. Semiconductor memories routinely have no errors when they operate, although operating systems like Unix have employed memory tests on start-up to detect failing hardware. Today, the requirement of reliable performance is made even more stringent when [[server farm]]s are the delivery platform.<ref>{{cite web |last=Shankland |first=Stephen |title=Google uncloaks once-secret server |website=CNET |date=1 April 2009 |url=https://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html |access-date=2009-04-01 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140716084210/http://www.cnet.com/news/google-uncloaks-once-secret-server-10209580/ |archive-date=2014-07-16}} "Since 2005, its [Google's] data centers have been composed of standard shipping containers—each with 1,160 servers and a power consumption that can reach 250 kilowatts." —Ben Jai of Google.</ref> Google has managed this by using fault-tolerant software to recover from hardware failures, and is even working on the concept of replacing entire server farms on-the-fly, during a service event.<ref>{{cite web |last=Shankland |first=Stephen |title=Google spotlights data center inner workings |website=CNET |date=30 May 2008 |url=https://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9955184-7.html?tag=nefd.lede |access-date=2008-05-31 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140818092344/http://www.cnet.com/news/google-spotlights-data-center-inner-workings/ |archive-date=2014-08-18}} "If you're running 10,000 machines, something is going to die every day." —Jeff Dean of Google.</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Google Groups |url=https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/a7640a2743922dcf?pli=1 |access-date=11 August 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110913014648/https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/a7640a2743922dcf?pli=1 |archive-date=2011-09-13|url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 352:
* [[History of personal computers]]
* [[History of software]]
* {{Annotated link|History of supercomputing}}
* [[Information Age]]
* [[IT History Society]]
|