Lkcl
Hi Luke, Welcome to Wikipedia. Best of luck. Richard W.M. Jones 22:57, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
proxy being used
edit
Lkcl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 217.147.94.29 . i run an HTTP proxy via a VPN on my own server, have done for 12 years as i move around different countries a lot. Lkcl (talk) 19:15, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The block is appropriate. However, you may be a candidate for WP:IPBE, as it sounds like you may be able to justify an exceptional need. Yamla (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
all sorted - WP:IPBE thanks User:Yamla Lkcl (talk) 21:09, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=115970425
Help
editLkcl- the article on SMB and its parts and related protocols would benifit from describing them using the OSI model and/or the TCP/IP stack. Thanks -indolering
Minor edits
editMinor edits should only be used for edits that could not possibly be disputed - things like spelling and grammer corrections, and wikifing. Do not use minor edits for any change in content. Hipocrite - «Talk» 20:00, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
TM
editI enjoyed reading your addition to Talk: TM. It won't stop the edit wars, and they will now probably take aim at you as well, but at least you've written something that is actually from the TM point of view. Thank you! David 16:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your reply! I agree with your points. David 15:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
A Note on Encyclopedic Language
editHi,
I am following events at Bourke engine with some interest. You appear to be doing a good job with the citations, but might I suggest you concentrate on making sure your language is encyclopedic as well? Your knowledge on the subject seems impressive, and I want to make sure your contributions to Wikipedia stand the best chance of not being reversed. If you have questions or comments, please leave a note on my talk page. Cheers, Ebikeguy (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thanks - it's not so much "my" knowledge as it is that i got the book, have been reading it every day, and have been discussing it with a friend for about an hour a day because we're evaluating whether to put this engine - or a variant - into mass-production. so i'm learning as i go: it's Bourke's knowledge that i'm absorbing. regarding the style: i'm quite a prolific writer on technical subjects, and once wrote an entire technical book without ever using personal pronouns (at all - including the introduction), but i am a) not entirely used to wikipedia although i've read lots and occasionally contributed small-scale for over a decade b) am taking over what is effectively abandoned page that had several prior editors, including a few bun-fights, by people who clearly didn't understand the subject matter. but one who believed that he did, if it's the same person i think it is, there is empirical evidence to suggest that he's slightly mentally unstable :) anyway i'm correcting bits as i go. i'm aware i do slightly... archaic sentence construction, but i'm also keenly aware that i'm somewhat hampered by having to focus on rebuttal of the "Engineering Critique" which is... achh it's bad. if the engineering critique section is anything to go by, it's no wonder nobody's taken up the Bourke Engine... Otto has a _lot_ to answer for. *sigh*. Lkcl (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
LMDB
editHello, I replied to your allegations on my talk page. Please have a look and clarify if I've misunderstood something. In any case, I did not push my copy to the oringal LMDB ___location. That was done by user Aperson. Mwasheim (talk) 14:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 27 August
edit
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the EOMA-68 page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Lkcl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit Hello, Lkcl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Lkcl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Permute instruction
editHello. Your request for page restoration was approved. You'll find the content at User:Lkcl/Permute instruction. Have a great day! A S U K I T E 14:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I have restored the deleted page Talk:Permute instruction and moved it to User:Lkcl/Permute instruction so that you can work on it there. Don't return it to main space until it has some content. Creating a stub with minimal meaningful content is fine, but not one with no meaningful content at all. JBW (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you to you both for your kind attention, JBW and User:Asukite i will update it first and carry out the move once completed (done it before) Lkcl (talk) 15:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Bit manipulation instruction set moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Bit manipulation instruction set, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 23:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Peer review for vector processor
editHi, if you're still interested, I can leave some comments at the peer review for vector processor. Zetana (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- yes please Zetana because this is one of a very rare set of high-importance (well over 400 links) topics, with both historic significance and modern-day usage, and there's just not enough review or understanding at all. any review any time is very welcome Lkcl (talk) 12:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Okay! I am busy right now but I can get to your PR by this Friday at the latest. Zetana (talk) 07:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- I dropped off the edge of the world for 4 years ... :) Lkcl (talk) 22:17, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Okay! I am busy right now but I can get to your PR by this Friday at the latest. Zetana (talk) 07:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Bit manipulation instruction set
edit
Hello, Lkcl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bit manipulation instruction set, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your draft article, Draft:Bit manipulation instruction set
edit
Hello, Lkcl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bit manipulation instruction set".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Scoreboarding CDC 6600
editHello Lkcl ;
I've see your post on the Scoreboarding/OOO articles, and also your articles on LibreSOC and some discussions on comp.arch. I'm contacting you because i want to vastly improve the article on Scoreboarding (and my wikibook on computer architecture), and i think you could help me on some points. You seem to know more about the CDC 6600 scoreboard, so you could help me.
Do you have more ressources about the real CDC 6600 scoreboard ? I've already read the book "Design of a computer", but the terminology is quite hard to understand, and some things are hard to understand : are the designator stored in the scoreboard, when they are coded in unary and binary, ...). There is a reference about a patent on Q-tables, but i didn't find it.
Mewtow (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- hi mewtow I am adapting to life after multiple strokes due to domestic violence, you will need to do your own research but look at the Ooo talk page recently. Lkcl (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- just a followup: the topic literally took me 6 months to understand. I had exchanges with mitch alsup about 3 times a week directly, and many more on comp.arch. we even found an error in his book chapters as I implemented the circuits, and he also found that the CDC6600 FPU was pipelined, something nobody has ever noticed before. even Thornton noted that the circuits are deceptively simple. I suggest going via the Tomasulo algorithm then following my "Tomasulo transform" page on Libre-SOC.org Lkcl (talk) 20:57, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
Another Talk:Vector processor section you might want to look at
editTalk:Vector processor § Not the real history also talks about "on-chip simd operations" vs "vector instructions" Guy Harris (talk) 14:46, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
- taaa :) I believe it's kinda sorted, when I did the big review/editing four years back? Lkcl (talk) 15:18, 24 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
edit
Your edit to Single instruction, multiple threads has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dianna this is just not true. I am an experienced Software Libre Developer of over 25 years, and I tracked down the fact that the content is released under the Apache2 license - including the images. Lkcl (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Apache2 is not a compatible license. Here is a list of compatible licenses. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- damnit ok I didn't know that. which begs the question: if it's not compatible then why the heck is there no warning on upload?? Lkcl (talk) 02:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- ok so can you explain exactly which clauses in the Apache2 license are not compatible with the goals intents redistributability and reuse of the Wikipedia project? has a Legal Opinion been sought and published online? (Legal Opinion is a very specific term used in law which provides indemnity - covered under insurance of the Law firm if it turns out to be wrong) Lkcl (talk) 03:02, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_copyright_tags/Free_licenses explicitly contradicts what you have stated, sorry. Lkcl (talk) 03:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- The file copyright rules apply to uploads of images only, not copypasted prose. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- diana you need to be more explicit and clear, I am autistic, have been tortured and abused to the point of death (not a joke or euphemism), have had over 100 Ischemic strokes in the past two years, and have been editing a hell of a lot of pages recently, and cannot remember exact exits. what *exactly* are you referring to. also please avoid any type of aggression (such as threats to terminate editing rights) as it could put me into shock. Lkcl (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry about your health issues. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- yyeah it's pretty bad. I'm lucky to be alive. I remembered what I did (so many edits since it seems like forever). I thought it was ok to take the bullet-pointed list from the FOSS GPU's markdown architecture page and convert to Wikimedia markup, not realizing the license incompatibility. the bulletlist is pretty detailed and relevant, as SIMT is so damn obtuse, esp with the word "threads" being hugely overloaded. I'll summarize instead, but could do with seeing what I wrote, as I did some insights on the bullet-list which have gone as well. is it possible to retrieve what *I* wrote? iirc it preceded the bullet-list, would have said something like "this feature {X} is part of SIMT"? thx Diannaa Lkcl (talk) 14:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- No, sorry, even the introduction was copied. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:21, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- yyeah it's pretty bad. I'm lucky to be alive. I remembered what I did (so many edits since it seems like forever). I thought it was ok to take the bullet-pointed list from the FOSS GPU's markdown architecture page and convert to Wikimedia markup, not realizing the license incompatibility. the bulletlist is pretty detailed and relevant, as SIMT is so damn obtuse, esp with the word "threads" being hugely overloaded. I'll summarize instead, but could do with seeing what I wrote, as I did some insights on the bullet-list which have gone as well. is it possible to retrieve what *I* wrote? iirc it preceded the bullet-list, would have said something like "this feature {X} is part of SIMT"? thx Diannaa Lkcl (talk) 14:52, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry about your health issues. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- diana you need to be more explicit and clear, I am autistic, have been tortured and abused to the point of death (not a joke or euphemism), have had over 100 Ischemic strokes in the past two years, and have been editing a hell of a lot of pages recently, and cannot remember exact exits. what *exactly* are you referring to. also please avoid any type of aggression (such as threats to terminate editing rights) as it could put me into shock. Lkcl (talk) 05:22, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- The file copyright rules apply to uploads of images only, not copypasted prose. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:44, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Apache2 is not a compatible license. Here is a list of compatible licenses. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Clarify pseudocode
editIn the Flynn's taxonomy could you clarify the code? You use the syntaxhighlighting template with C as language even though it is not C. I think it would be better if you either wrote a real implementation in a real language or if you write pseudocode not use the syntaxhighlighting template and instead write the pseudeocode as the guidelines in MOS:PSEUDOCODE. Frap (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- hi frap I cut/paste from the permute page, it was a preexisting edit and there is no concept in MOS:PSEUDOCODE for predicate masking. the syntax is deficient for expressing that very important computer science concept. hence likely reason why the original author chose syntaxhighlight. Lkcl (talk) 05:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
Lkcl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
rsjaffe: you have been completely misled Lkcl (talk) 16:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. CoconutOctopus talk 16:12, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you wish to appeal this block you will need to show you understand why it was made and show how you will edit collaboratively and avoid the sort of disagreements that have caused the issue. CoconutOctopus talk 16:13, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
edit