Content deleted Content added
→OPPO A5s: new section |
m Reverted edit by 175.100.6.144 (talk) to last version by Mindmatrix |
||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) | |||
Line 22:
| format= %%i
}}
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2025 ==
Line 47 ⟶ 41:
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done''': it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> <span style="font-family: Brush Script MT; text-shadow: 5px 3px 8px;">[[User:Sophisticatedevening|<span style="color: purple">Sophisticatedevening</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Sophisticatedevening|<span style="color: purple">(talk)</span>]]</sup></span> 20:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
==
The only images in this article are all women. This erases men from the history of programming. This is a severe gender bias and misrepresentation. [[Special:Contributions/2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:EB5A:416D:DE81:CA5A|2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:EB5A:416D:DE81:CA5A]] ([[User talk:2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:EB5A:416D:DE81:CA5A|talk]]) 07:50, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
:Obviously it is likely all the men in the world have been laid off, died off, retired, or have gone into other engineering fields with real jobs ;-). I also noticed there might be a tiny emphasis on convincing primary women and minorities that programming is a viable career choice while others types of people are pushed to the sidelines and this is what you may have noticed on WP. Take for instance, much AI training is currently done by mostly women in poorer countries around the world because of the deleterious nature of the work and lower wages. So yes, someone should put in the article an archive picture that showed men where programmers. [[User:Septagram|Septagram]] ([[User talk:Septagram|talk]]) 16:06, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||