Talk:General-purpose computing on graphics processing units: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→GPGPU redirects: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply |
→GPGPU redirects: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Disambiguation links added Reply |
||
Line 342:
:::done both - that *should* be the lot. have to come back after template refresh on a *lot* of pages https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Nvidia&oldid=1305848203 [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 12:23, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
:i needed a way to exclude transclusions: a quick hack on the whatlinkshere help page [[Help:What_links_here#Workaround_to_hide_transcluded_links]] says to use "insource" and guess what? a '''considerable portion''' of those refer to GPGPU as '''hardware'''. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3A%2F%5C%5B%5C%5BGeneral-purpose+computing+on+graphics+processing+units%5C%7C%2F&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1 [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 12:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
::arrrgh one of these is the [[Nintendo_Switch]] which has used "GPGPU (hardware)" to refer to the '''internal''' hardware compute units (presumably the number of cores, or the number of specialised shader-units, or possibly even the number of [[SIMT]] Processing Elements (see [[Flynn's taxonomy|Array processor]]). bottom line the *entirety of wikipedia* is not just divided on this conflation, but there are '''page errors as well'''. this is simply too big a task for one person to fix. no idea how to go from here. [[User:Lkcl|Lkcl]] ([[User talk:Lkcl|talk]]) 13:02, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
| |||