Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
EVula (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by 80.201.18.60 (talk) to last version by GDonato
Line 14:
<!-- New entries go down at the *BOTTOM* of the page, not here. -->
<!-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->
 
== [[Spam Project is obstructing Arbitration Procedures = Arbitration Requests erased and blocked]] ==
 
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand.svg|40px|left]]}}} For the second time in a week the access to arbitration requests has been closed by members of The spam project. The access was again closed after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=138834097#Request_for_arbitration_in_the_WorkForAll_versus_Requestion_case a legitimate and motivated request for arbitration] was filed which fundamentally questioned the procedures and denounced the abuse of power and wrongfull methods of the spam project. Spam squad members simply erased the request from the files without justification given, and closed the access to the request page again for several days.
 
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand.svg|40px|left]]}}} The erasal of the request and blocking of the access to arbitration by the spam project does not only constitute qualified vandalism as to Wiki:Etiquette, but it has the consequence of obstructing normal judicial procedures to come to a settlement in this and other case. The actions of the Spam project seem to be part of a large scale cover-up operation of their illegitimate actions. The obstruction of justice and cover up operations is seriously compromising Wikipedia’s credibility and neutrality.
 
=== [[Spam Project obstructing Arbitration Procedure = Arbitration Requests erased and blocked]] ===
 
 
== [[Bossaball]] ==
Line 192 ⟶ 183:
 
Based on [[Talk:Fop]] and the contribs history, I see nothing wrong with the block or with the image removal by [[User:One Night In Hackney]] and [[User:CambridgeBayWeather]]. The only ambiguity is whether the image removal should be because of vanity, spam, or BLP. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 16:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 
== [[Spam Project is obstructing Arbitration Procedures = Arbitration Requests erased and blocked]] ==
 
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand.svg|40px|left]]}}} For the second time in a week the access to arbitration requests has been closed by members of The spam project. The access was again closed after [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration&oldid=138834097#Request_for_arbitration_in_the_WorkForAll_versus_Requestion_case a legitimate and motivated request for arbitration] was filed which fundamentally questioned the procedures and denounced the abuse of power and wrongfull methods of the spam project. Spam squad members simply erased the request from the files without justification given, and closed the access to the request page again for several days.
 
{{{icon|[[Image:Stop hand.svg|40px|left]]}}} The erasal of the request and blocking of the access to arbitration by the spam project does not only constitute qualified vandalism as to Wiki:Etiquette, but it has the consequence of obstructing normal judicial procedures to come to a settlement in this and other case. The actions of the Spam project seem to be part of a large scale cover-up operation of their illegitimate actions. The obstruction of justice and cover up operations is seriously compromising Wikipedia’s credibility and neutrality.
 
=== [[Spam Project obstructing Arbitration Procedure = Arbitration Requests erased and blocked]] ===
 
 
== Relevant admin-related BLP discussions ==