Content deleted Content added
BarrelProof (talk | contribs) Chronological order |
BarrelProof (talk | contribs) Time and date of comment |
||
Line 34:
[[User:Comatose51|Comatose51]] 01:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
:No liability issue - every single page of Wikipedia has a link to [[Wikipedia:General_disclaimer]] at the bottom. True and/or verifiable? I don't know. I think you did the right thing to move it here. [[User:FreplySpang|FreplySpang]] [[User talk:FreplySpang|(talk)]] 01:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
== "Fatalities" ==▼
''Reptile enthusiasts are quick to note, however, that there are far more human deaths each year caused by dogs than by large constrictors.''▼
THe above is an absurd statement. Of course there are more deaths attributed to dogs than snakes: one could say there are more deaths per year because of dogs than of unicorns. I removed it.▼
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/142.176.56.32|142.176.56.32]] ([[User talk:142.176.56.32#top|talk]]) 13:08, 6 July 2005 (UTC)</small>
Re: the above...▼
It has nothing to do with snakes, but by far the majority of human fatalities attributable to dogs are not from lethal attacks per se but from rabies contracted from dog bites in less developed countries (especially India and nearby countries) where for economic reasons, dogs are not widely vaccinated against the disease. ▼
With regard to snakes, there are actually a fairly large number of human deaths each year from snake bite in the areas of the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia with which I am familiar but these are almost invariably from venom, not constriction, coupled with local unavailability of antidotes. Going barefoot at night on rural paths and roads without a light is an important, but not the only, risk factor. These incidents are not rare, though many or most people survive a poisonous shake's bite. Just for a rough sense of frequency, my closest friend's grandfather died this way in one south Asian country, and my wife's close relative almost died from snakebite in South Korea a year or two ago (he was hiking).▼
== I disagree with the above: ==
Line 58 ⟶ 72:
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:FurnaldHall|FurnaldHall]] ([[User talk:FurnaldHall#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/FurnaldHall|contribs]]) 03:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)</small>
▲== "Fatalities" ==
▲''Reptile enthusiasts are quick to note, however, that there are far more human deaths each year caused by dogs than by large constrictors.''
▲THe above is an absurd statement. Of course there are more deaths attributed to dogs than snakes: one could say there are more deaths per year because of dogs than of unicorns. I removed it.
▲Re: the above...
▲It has nothing to do with snakes, but by far the majority of human fatalities attributable to dogs are not from lethal attacks per se but from rabies contracted from dog bites in less developed countries (especially India and nearby countries) where for economic reasons, dogs are not widely vaccinated against the disease.
▲With regard to snakes, there are actually a fairly large number of human deaths each year from snake bite in the areas of the Indian subcontinent and Southeast Asia with which I am familiar but these are almost invariably from venom, not constriction, coupled with local unavailability of antidotes. Going barefoot at night on rural paths and roads without a light is an important, but not the only, risk factor. These incidents are not rare, though many or most people survive a poisonous shake's bite. Just for a rough sense of frequency, my closest friend's grandfather died this way in one south Asian country, and my wife's close relative almost died from snakebite in South Korea a year or two ago (he was hiking).
== Eating People ==
| |||