Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 222:
::That's probably not a big deal; see [[Wikipedia:Silence and consensus]]. -- [[User:Kendrick7|Kendrick7]]<sup>[[User talk:Kendrick7|talk]]</sup> 03:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
:::That's not a guideline. But anyway, if people are aware of a proposal and don't voice an objection, that might apply. But there's a difference between silence during a proposal and silence after an action is taken under the false pretense of there having been a demonstrated consensus. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Equazcion|<font color="#000">Equazcion</font>]] [[User talk:equazcion|•''✗'']]/[[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|''C'' •]] ''04:58, 21 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small>
::::I appreciate your looking into that for me. It seems that my suspicions are at least part right. There is a lot more to this than even I realized. Also, I hope you don't look upon this process as one in which those on different sides of this issue are "opponents." This is supposed to be a process in which both sides can find areas where we can agree and come to a final conclusion about the issue. So far, it seems that we all agree that the userbox policies are flawed in some respect and are in conflict with other, related policies. What we must now come to an agreement on is how the policies must be altered or what otherwise should be done with them. Personally, I think it should be kept as simple as possible, applying more of the existing, core policies and guidelines than trying to legislate in minutiae. [[User:LaMenta3|LaMenta3]] ([[User talk:LaMenta3|talk]]) 05:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
==Comment by [[User:Rudget|Rudget]]==
| |||