Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content

Page format

edit

I'm still unsure on whether we should follow the "endorse/oppose this summary" format, or just have threaded discussions. Any suggestions? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Makes it hard to reply with neutral or opposing comments. Adding neutral/oppose subsections to each summary would be impractical. I'd say we could leave the separate summaries, just lose the "I endorse" subsections and allow free discussion below each summary. Equazcion /C 15:13, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't see what's done, but ok :) Equazcion /C 16:15, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
K, now I do :) Equazcion /C 16:16, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Yep, got momentarily busy with something else in between editing. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikiquette alert for User:WebHamster

edit

I've posted a wikiquette alert at WP:WQA#User:WebHamster. I've never done one of these before so I don't know what exactly happens next, but there it is. Equazcion /C 20:33, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)

Hm.

edit

What exactly do people think to gain from this discussion? >Radiant< 23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Some sort of fair consensus on how to handle this issue, maybe? This user feels the status quo is flawed. -- Kendrick7talk 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Kendrick summed it up. It doesn't hurt to have a centralized good-faithed discussion on hot topics every once in a while, does it? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Summary?

edit

Can someone summarize the history of the issue? Not the particular MfD that got us here but the history of userbox deletions and POV in userspace.--Doug.(talk contribs) 03:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ooops, I guess you're doing this in the Project Space not the talk space, the link posted on MfD's talk took me here. Guess I better do some reading.--Doug.(talk contribs) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply