Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→General discussion: Agree that format markup isn't really the issue |
|||
Line 225:
::::: An opponent is one who opposes. Those who oppose my argument are my opponents. And this is an argument, an argument being a discussion in which the participants disagree. Just because I consider this an argument, complete with opponents as an argument must have by definition, does not mean that I consider this a game or a fight of any kind. If I did then I wouldn't be willing to point out flaws in my own side, as I've just done above :) <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Equazcion|<font color="#000">Equazcion</font>]] [[User talk:equazcion|•''✗'']]/[[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|''C'' •]] ''06:04, 21 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small>
::::::That mindset and some of your other comments, however, make it appear that you are not at all interested at reaching a compromise or a mutual agreement about the issue, which is the point of this exercise. [[User:LaMenta3|LaMenta3]] ([[User talk:LaMenta3|talk]]) 17:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
::::::: I apologize. I thought you were arguing to allow political userboxes and I was arguing not to. I didn't know your comments were more intended to reach compromise than mine were. I'll try to correct this. Also I would have thought that researching and removing the guideline tag at WP:USERBOX would have been evidence enough that I wasn't falling victim to my biases, but if it wasn't, then I apologize once more. I hope you can forgive me and that we can put this behind us. <small style="font:bold 10px Arial;display:inline;border:#009 1px dashed;padding:1px 6px 2px 7px;white-space:nowrap">[[User:Equazcion|<font color="#000">Equazcion</font>]] [[User talk:equazcion|•''✗'']]/[[Special:Contributions/Equazcion|''C'' •]] ''20:37, 22 Jan 2008 (UTC)''</small>
:Well this one's a "good luck" to all interested. (Good luck in finding the many many piles of commentary, across a myriad of talk pages, some almost simultaneously : )
| |||