Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalencoder: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Catalencoder: delete |
Relisting debate |
||
Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
:{{la|Catalencoder}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catalencoder|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February
:({{Find sources|Catalencoder}})
I found no notability. This software fails [[WP:N]]. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 13:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>—[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 14:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''': all I found is [http://www.clubic.com/telecharger-fiche12132-catalencoder.html staff review on French download site] and [http://www.redferret.net/?p=24300 short review on some obscure site]. Just not enough for [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:NSOFT]], given that this is a software that ''can'' be reviewed in depth. — [[User:Czarkoff|Dmitrij D. Czarkoff]] ([[User talk:Czarkoff|talk]]) 17:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 16:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />
| |||