- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Catalencoder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 13:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: all I found is staff review on French download site and short review on some obscure site. Just not enough for WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT, given that this is a software that can be reviewed in depth. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 02:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a failure to establish notability. Cloudz679 08:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.