Revision as of 19:17, 11 October 2019 edit Meters (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 180,237 edits →Captured! by Robots: cmt ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:36, 11 October 2019 edit undo Meters (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 180,237 edits →Captured! by Robots: + Next edit →
Line 7: Aside from some minor coverage, the group does not pass [[WP:NBAND]]. Also, since the band has recently got added to Metal Archives it makes the need for a Wikipedia page even less nessesary. All the info is better / more neatly detailed [https://www.metal-archives.com/bands/Captured%21_by_Robots/3540446126 over there] (although I dont know if this carries any extra weight). I wasn't able to find any sources that make this page passable. [[User:Second Skin\|Second Skin]] ([[User talk:Second Skin\|talk]]) 16:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC) '''Comment'''I've had my concerns about this novelty act article for a long time, and nothing substantial has changed since I tagged much if it as failing verification two years ago. I'll see what I can dig up on it but I seem to remember that I did not find much when I looked last time. Note that the existence of coverage of the group elsewhere is certainly not grounds for deletion of the article. If we followed that reasoning Wikipedia would have no articles at all. Wikipedia does not generate material, we simply report what other sources say about subjects. [[User:Meters\|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters\|talk]]) 19:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC) *And the Metal Archives appears to be a user-generated site, and so is not a reliable source. [[User:Meters\|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters\|talk]]) 19:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captured! by Robots: Difference between revisions