Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captured! by Robots: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added to an afd list. |
→Captured! by Robots: missinghte point |
||
Line 12:
:Did I say metal archives is a "reliable source"? All I said was it's essentially the same thing Wikipedia is, and as such, makes a article on here less necessary [[User:Second Skin|Second Skin]] ([[User talk:Second Skin|talk]]) 07:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bands and musicians|list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 13:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)</small>
::My comment that it was not reliable was simply to point out that we cannot use that site as a ref for anything. I'm leaning towards deletion (if no-one comes up with better refs and a good argument for keeping it) but your contention that the existence of another website (and a non-reliable one at that) with similar information is something that should be considered in the AFD is completely wrong. If you don't understand why you should probably not be opening AFDs.
| |||