Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faheem thalib
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:47, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 16:47, 9 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7, one author who has blanked page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Faheem thalib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet criteria of WP:BIO. Sixty-four Google results for the name, mostly directory entries. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clearly non-notable, per nom. Yunshui (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find any discussion of him in reliable sources. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.