Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CCNet (Course Management System)
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One bot (talk | contribs) at 02:00, 30 September 2012 (Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 02:00, 30 September 2012 by One bot (talk | contribs) (Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CCNet (Course Management System) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It is simply not notable. RBrideau (talk) 18:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 14:15, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The references indicate that instances of the software are or have been in use, but nothing found to indicate that it is notable. AllyD (talk) 20:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per AllyD. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 08:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete fails WP:GNG. it's been listed for almost 3 weeks and no one has found good sources. LibStar (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.