Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Project page to request technical page moves

Shortcuts

• WP:RM/TRWP:RM/TR
• WP:RMTRWP:RMTR

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

• Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
• To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
• To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
• If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.

Add a new request

Remove all requests

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.

Uncontroversial technical requests

Most requests should be placed below this heading.

• Mulgi language (currently a redirect to Mulgi dialect) → Mulgi dialect (move · discuss) – rd holding up move — kwami (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should Võro language also be moved? Skarmory (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Semi-presidential republic → Semi-presidential systemSemi-presidential system (currently a redirect back to Semi-presidential republic) (move · discuss) – Consistency with presidential system, semi-parliamentary system, parliamentary system, and directorial system. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• CGG_(company) (currently a redirect to Viridien) → Viridien (move · discuss) – reflect the branding change from May 2024 68.253.19.193 (talk) 19:23, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

If your request involves reverting a move, place it here.

Contested technical requests

• Visakhapatnam railway station → Visakhapatnam Junction railway stationVisakhapatnam Junction railway station (currently a redirect back to Visakhapatnam railway station) (move · discuss) – Visakhapatnam Junction is the common and official name of the railway station. Already there is a article existing with the latter name (Visakhapatnam Junction), so unable to move the page from Visakhapatnam railway station to Visakhapatnam Junction railway station Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 16:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are some sources that still mention the name as the former title, and there seems to ne by a recent rename. ToadetteEdit (talk) 19:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Lidia Gueiler → Lydia GueilerLydia Gueiler (currently a redirect back to Lidia Gueiler) (move · discuss) – "Y" spelling seems to be the one used by Gueiler. It's reflected in presidential decrees during her presidency, in authored works, and in her authorized biography. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Krisgabwoosh (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  This would warrant a full discussion because it seems like "Lidia" is the WP:COMMONNAME in English-language sources: The New York Times, BBC, The Independent, The Washington Post, The Times, Los Angeles Times, El Pais, Reuters, Encyclopædia Britannica, Bolivian Express, United Press International, etc., as well as numerous books and academic sources. RachelTensions (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Would WP:COMMONNAME really apply in this situation, though? That policy seems to be most applicable to people known by a name or nickname different from their birthname. In this case, the only difference is that one spelling is the more correct one. Should a misspelling be preferred simply because most sources use it? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 18:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That'd be up to the RM process to decide. Since most sources spell it "Lidia", it's likely that somebody searching for her article would also expect it to be at "Lidia". At most, IMO, we should include a WP:EXPLNOTE in the lead of her article explaining that it is sometimes spelled "Lydia". RachelTensions (talk) 03:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yunnanilus nigromaculatus (currently a redirect to Eonemachilus nigromaculatus) → Eonemachilus nigromaculatus (move · discuss) – Eonemachilus is the genus name used in Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Quetzal1964 The article states that Eonemachilus is a former designation. Bensci54 (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes uses Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes for its taxonomy below the level of order. SeeWikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio → Columbus, Ohio metropolitan areaColumbus, Ohio metropolitan area (currently a redirect back to Columbus metropolitan area, Ohio) (move · discuss) – To be consistent with the first sentence in the paragraph Assadzadeh (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Assadzadeh The current name is consistent with Columbus metropolitan area, Georgia, but also I feel that the Ohio page might deserve primary topic for Columbus metropolitan area as it has approximately 5x the views as the Georgia page. An RM would be the best place to discuss this. Bensci54 (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This current name seems to be the result of some 2016 discussion that I am having a hard time finding. Either way, it would need a mass move request or RFC given there are many other articles in the same vein (Rochester metropolitan area, New York among others). Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024 impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol (currently a redirect to Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol) → Impeachment motion against Yoon Suk Yeol (move · discuss) – This is the only impeachment proceeding happened against Yoon Suk Yeol because there's no impeachment inquiry against him before. 114.10.72.221 (talk) 02:07, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Worth a discussion to see if WP:NOYEAR is met. C F A 02:18, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(note that the motion will be voted on in roughly 2 days, after which it will either be moved to "Impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol" or "Attempted impeachment of Yoon Suk Yeol") charlotte ^👸♥ 21:42, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus (currently a redirect to Nun galilaeus) → Nun galilaeus (move · discuss) – Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes places this species in the genus Nun Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IUCN Red List calls it "Oxynoemacheilus galilaeus". What gives Eschmeyer priority? The article doesn't even mention Nun galilaeus (except in an infobox and as one of several names in a navbox). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 05:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishes#Taxonomy Quetzal1964 (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• CD El Ejido → CP El EjidoCP El Ejido (currently a redirect back to CD El Ejido) (move · discuss) – This team has had their name changed for some time, finally recovering the "Poli" moniker, so i think it's only fair that the team article starts to use the name that it goes by now. Alternatively the article could be named: Polideportivo El Ejido. Also, the old logo was restored, so that would have to be changed too. Bodeseven (talk) 16:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Bodeseven - This name change doesn't appear to be mentioned in the article itself, can you provide some sources to support that the proposed new name is more common? Raladic (talk) 16:49, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I do. There's an article talking about the name change in detail. The club's page has algo updated the name, and it's also on it's X (twitter) account.

  I assume the new name is also present on the RFEF official tables.

  https://www.diariodealmeria.es/deportes/vuelve-poli-ejido-cambia-oficialmente-nombre_0_1630637482.html

  https://polideportivoejido.com

  https://x.com/Poli_ElEjido Bodeseven (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The New Six (currently a redirect to TNX (group)) → TNX (band)TNX (band) (currently a redirect instead to TNX (group)) (move · discuss) – Group has officially reverted to their previous and more notable acronym name variant. {{{sig}}} - K-popguardian (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @K-popguardian, I’d say that a formal RM is needed for this to settle on an official consensus-based title. It has a pretty contentious move history, and actually got here via a RM that had no participation per WP:RMNOMIN. -2pou (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshwadeep, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu Administrative Service (currently a redirect to DANICS) → Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) ServicesDelhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services (currently a redirect instead to DANICS) (move · discuss) – Correct name. See https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-08/DANICS_270314%5B1%5D.PDF. 117.230.80.188 (talk) 13:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Is there a shorter WP:COMMONNAME for this civil service? Probably "DANICS"? Surely nobody commonly refers to it as "Delhi, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Civil) Services"

  I'm not contesting this move (both the original and proposed move are similarly lengthy), just curious because that title is a lot. RachelTensions (talk) 14:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Change to another title Both the current title and the new one suggested by 117.230.80.188 seem to be too long as per Wikipedia:Concise. DANICS meets WP:UCRN since it is the most common one found in sources and is much shorter than the current title and should be used instead. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 14:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  (Disclaimer: Saw this on Discord) Based all of the sources in the article, including the one linked by this IP editor, DANICS is the current abbreviation of this subject. I see no evidence that it is no longer used, as the lead claims. This title is ridiculously long and obviously violates CONCISE, so I will boldly move to DANICS. Any editor may request that I revert the move by asking on my talk page. Toadspike [Talk] 14:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Rolong → BarolongBarolong (currently a redirect back to Rolong) (move · discuss) – Rolong is one of the many dialects of the Setswana language. Barolong is the name of the Sotho-Tswana ethnic group discussed in this article. Sentimental Boulevard ✿ 23:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Sentimental Boulevard While I am inclined to believe you, this isn't obvious from the article. Could you please provide a source that confirms your claim? Toadspike [Talk] 14:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for your response. Admittedly, I may have been mistaken, as I just came across a conflicting source. While the University of Cambridge Language Centre defines Rolong as a dialect of Setswana, an article from Sabinet African Journals asserts that Barolong is the plural form of Marolong, both terms referring to the ethnic group. Rolong appears to be an encompassing term. This article is the only source I have found that states this, though. Nonetheless, thank you for your skepticisim; I am happy to have come across this, and I mean that genuinely. I wonder if the name should be left alone. Or should the plural form be used? Sentimental Boulevard ✿ 16:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sentimental Boulevard Moved to contested due to uncertainty - if you change your mind let us know, or if you're still unsure, a move discussion may bring in enough input to clarify the matter. ASUKITE 17:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a page mover.

• Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (currently a redirect to Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation) → Bengaluru Metropolitan Transport Corporation (move · discuss) – RM closed as moved (uncontested, minimal participation). TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 16:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans: Is this article move protected? 162 etc. (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is currently sysop-protected. ASUKITE 18:43, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]