Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full-Option Science System
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Full-Option Science System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
tagged as possibly non-notable since 2015; a search for sources disclosed no studies of this system as of 2020, and not much else. ~TPW 13:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 13:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The link in the nomination says
no studies of Full Option Science System™ (FOSS) were found that fell within the scope of the Science review protocol and met WWC evidence standards
, which is a narrower claim than it might have first come across. A Google Scholar search finds, e.g, Robardey et al. (1994), Holahan et al. (2004), Mangrubang (2004), Zimmerman et al. (2011), and others. XOR'easter (talk) 01:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)