Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Pegship (talk | contribs) at 19:15, 29 August 2025 (archiving May). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Shortcuts
WikiProject Stub sorting
Information
Project page talk
- Stub types (sections) talk
- Stub types (full list) talk
- To do talk
- Naming conventions talk
- Redirects category talk
Wikipedia:Stub talk
Discussion
Proposals (A) talk
- Current month
Discussion talk
Criteria (A) (discontinued) talk
Deletion (Log) (discontinued) talk
Category

On this WikiProject Stub sorting subpage, you can propose new stub types (please read the procedures beforehand!), as well as the reorganization and subdivision of existing stub types. You can also discuss anything else related to stubs on the talk page.

Proposing new stub types – procedure

edit

Important: If you wish to propose the creation of a stub article you've come to the wrong place. If you don't have a username yourself, please go to WP:AFC for proposing a new article. If you already have a username, you can create the article yourself. If you don't know how, add {{Helpme}} to your user talk page to request help from other editors. This page only deals with stub templates and categories; we cannot help you with creating articles.

Proposing new stub types
If you wish to propose a new stub category and template, please follow these procedures:
  1. Check the List of stub types or under Category:Stub categories to make sure that your proposed new stub does not already exist.
  2. List it at the top of the current month's section, under a header, like the ones shown (if any). Sign it with a datestamp (~~~~).
    • Please bear in mind that a stub category isn't about the importance or notability of the topic!
  3. Find a good number[1] of stub articles, as many as you can, that will fit that template. You may use this tool to scan through categories; tagged stubs are always in Category:All stub articles and transclude {{asbox}}. Each of these articles can be:
    • currently marked with {{stub}};
    • currently marked with another type of stub tag (in which case you should justify why your tag is better for the article than the current one);
    • a stub whose categorisation is highly ambiguous or questionable;
    • not marked as a stub.
  4. If you use any category scan (from the tool mentioned above or from any other), please link to it so that other users can confirm that the results are still accurate.
  5. Others may do the same, if they so desire.
  6. 5 days after listing it here, if there is general approval or no objection, go ahead and create the new category and/or template following the format on Wikipedia:Stub. List the new stub type on the stub types list in an appropriate section. If consensus is not clear, or discussion is still ongoing, the proposal will remain open until consensus can be reached.
  7. If you wish to propose a stub type which does not currently have 60 articles that could use it, you may propose an upmerged template in a similar way. An upmerged template would feed into currently existing stub categories until such time that there are enough stubs for a separate stub category. At that point a category for it may be separately proposed. Some times, it may be difficult to be sure how many stubs would get a tag - in which case you can also start with an upmerged stub tag until you're sure there are enough.

DO NOT place a proposal here for any stub type which has already been created and is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. The proposal page is only for stub types that have not yet been created, and it is better to keep any discussion of such stub types in one place rather than splitting it between different pages. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion is the correct page for proposals to delete a stub type.

^ Good number means about 60 articles or more, or 30 or more if it is the primary stub type of a WikiProject, though this figure may vary from case to case.

"Speedy creation"

edit

A stub type may be proposed for "speedy creation" if it meets one of the following criteria:

  • S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles.
  • S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist (e.g., X-bio-stub, X-hist-stub, or X-geo-stub, where X is the name of an internationally widely recognised country) or other instances where a clearly established pattern of similar subtypes exists. The proposed topic may not be controversial in scope.

List speedy creation proposals in the same proposal listings as normal stub proposals below.

Proposals, August 2025

edit

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

edit

Speedy categories

edit

I will likely create these when I'm at my computer next time:

Might be worth having the -river-stub for each one double upmerged to there as well as the river category (look at my speedy from last week), might also make a couple of other counties viable?. Waacstats (talk) 08:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spilomelinae sub-stubs

edit

Some of the stubs in Spilomelinae stubs are of the Hydririni tribe; as such, I'd like to propose a subcategory/template:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also plan on making {{Herpetogrammatini-stub}} for those belonging to the following genera of Herpetogrammatini (these don't have their own stub category):
- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great catch, these need a good breakdown. Waacstats (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Coccinellidae stubs

edit

Coccinellidae stubs is hella big; I propose making the following sub-stubs (based on subfamily, tribe, then genera): Coccinellinae stubs, {{Coccinellinae-stub}}

Epilachnini stubs, {{Epilachnini-stub}}

Scymninae stubs, {{Scymninae-stub}}

Sticholotidinae stubs, {{Sticholotidinae-stub}}

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:35, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, however I would suggest making templates for the tribe level, I think there are other genera that could go there and if there aren't now there may be in the future if the biologist decide to move genera around. Waacstats (talk) 08:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just included the tribe templates in my request. I'm getting ready to go to class - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 13:46, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A note to any admins looking for any empty categories: I'm currently working on these, but I'm not at home right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:13, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ardabil province geography sub-stubs

edit

Main stub category: Ardabil province geography stubs. I'm back before school starts to make proposals:

Looks good, glad to see you back! Waacstats (talk) 08:16, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crambini stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 650 articles, perm cat has no sub cats however I propose th following based on links to category:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Flavobacteria stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Safetly in the 600+ articles, I would like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tineidae stubs

edit

Closing in on 700 I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ulidiidae

edit

Another one pushing 700 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support all of the above :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:00, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Actinomycetota

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Close to 700 articles so could do with a split. I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rugby union orgs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Not desperatly needed but will tidy up the parent categories

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the parent cat & previous stub formats, I think this should be "Rugby union organisation stubs" and "Rugbyunion-org-stub". Her Pegship (?) 19:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, I obviously didn't update my quick note to propose it properly. Waacstats (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So now should be Rugby union organisation stubs {{Rugbyunion-org-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of steroids

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 could do with a split

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks over 60

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm creating them right now - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, @Waacstats, how do you find these large stub templates? I'd love to know :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are just ones I come across. I wish I had an easier way of finding them though. Waacstats (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedys

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of new categories where the associated tempalte(s) have passed the 60 park:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Apocynaceae

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A nother one over 700 pages, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypsogastropoda stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one looks reaady to split, at 668 pages and 51 categories, all the pages are already using by genus(?) templates I propose we use the next layer down that the perm cats use which would mean the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Limenitidinae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Anouther biological category with over 700 articles. I propose the following split based on perm cats:

I'm not 100% convinced on the name for the second one, I'm not convinced we need the disambig for either the template or the category but the perrm cat uses it so? anyone any ideas? Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Miridae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another over 700, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Milesiini stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is approaching 750 I propose the following based on names and not categories as the parent has no perm sub cats.

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesostigmata stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another tree of life category pushing 800, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphylinidae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 800 articles, I propose the following splits:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Large Olympic medalists stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Dutch, French, German, Swedish and Soviet subcats have recently grown to over 600 and I would like to cut these back a bit. A few other countries could do with a trim as well:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports biographies

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of Sports biographies without stub categories. I propose the following category which should be viable based on articles that have asbox (atleast one stub template).

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ascomycota stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has a number of large subcats, I would like to propose the following categories and templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cumberland geography stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have 2 non-metropolitan I propose using these to split them.

I have followed the article and permcat for disambiging Cumberland UA nd historic county. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theclinae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, could do with a split:

All appear viable per the parent cats. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Protein stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 800 articles we already of 1 split by ___location so I thought the following would be useful, it will still be oversized but not not quite so oversized

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
some upmerged templates that have passed the 60 mark.

and some categories each from a number of templates:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Biologist

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some refining is possible with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, July 2025

edit

Canada lake stubs

edit

Canada lake stubs should be split into subcategories:

this looks good to me.Waacstats (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories unless anyone has any objections:

Waacstats (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support these look good, just be sure to add WikiProjects in the talk pages (if possible). Thanks for keeping this WikiProject alive! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:46, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I really hope this is the last of them...

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I'm getting really tired of restubbing all of these French geography articles, so here's hopefully the last of them before I stop making these for good. Meuse (department) geography stubs has over 500 articles, so I'm splitting this up by arrondissement:

- OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, There are still plently of departments to split by arrondissement if you want, just none of them look too large at the moment. Waacstats (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm definitely not going to split them up at this time. I'll get started with creating the templates and categories (old and new) soon, so be prepared to do a lot of sorting... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:19, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iran road stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose making a stub category for Iran geography stubs, Asia road stubs and Iran transport stubs: Iran road stubs! {{Iran-road-stub}} has over 60 transclusions - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:03, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently organizing the road stub templates right now, starting with the Asian section - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:22, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mine stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hi all - there are over 500 stubs relating to locations of ore extraction (as opposed to any other type of mine :)) in Category:Mine stubs. A couple of by-country subcats have already been split out. I'd like to add a few upmerged national templates, and new subcats for any which reach the magical 60 mark. The following would be instantly useful...

...and it's likely that a few more useful ones will become obvious when I start to sort. Any objections? Grutness...wha? 15:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support! Her Pegship (?) 19:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peg - good to see you're still active at WPSS! :) Grutness...wha? 03:23, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
'::waves:: Her Pegship (?) 23:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 16:04, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, this is beginning to feel like the old days. Waacstats (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt I'll ever get back to that level of stubbing again :) Grutness...wha? 13:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Except I'm here to help! - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome! Good to see a new "stub obsessive" :) Grutness...wha? 01:25, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A stubsessive - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: I'm also creating {{Ukraine-mine-stub}} and {{Mongolia-mine-stub}} - there are a surprising number of Mongolian ones! Grutness...wha? 07:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Both Canada and the US reached 60 stubs, so I've also created categories for them. Grutness...wha? 11:05, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Burmese film stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Propose making Burmese film stubs for {{Myanmar-film-stub}}; there are over 200 articles waiting to be moved to a more specific category - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 23:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support seems a good split to me. Waacstats (talk) 13:16, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposals, June 2025

edit

Another German geography stub proposal

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Hesse geography stubs is looking a bit chubby; I propose making Hesse mountain stubs ({{Hesse-mountain-stub}}) for 114 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baden-Württemberg mountain stubs ({{BadenWürttemberg-mountain-stub}}) should likewise be created for 132 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Again support follows precedant Waacstats (talk) 12:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Create Rhineland-Palatinate river stubs for {{RhinelandPalatinate-river-stub}}, making it a subcat of Rhineland-Palatinate geography stubs and Germany river stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Follows precedent. Waacstats (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Alabama Registered Historic Place stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another category over the 700 mark, I propose splitting this up by county template with the counties grouped as per Category:Alabama geography stubs. I have run out of energy for typing them up, so if anyone wants them all typed up, tough, honestly I will have them here before I start but just look at the geo cat for now. Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Idaho Registered Historic Place stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another one over 700, we don't have a decent split of the geo category, in fact we need to look at getting rid of some undersize county categories at some point. I propose templates for the counties and then see if between the geos and the NRHP we can come up with some regions to use.Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, I propose splitting by county templates grouped per the geography stubs. It seems a bit overkill but... Georgia (U.S. state) Registered Historic Place stubs - {{GeorgiaUS-NRHP-stub}}

Atlanta Metropolitan Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BarrowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BartowCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ButtsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CarrollCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CherokeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CobbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CowetaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DawsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DeKalbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DouglasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FayetteCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ForsythCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FultonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GwinnettCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HaralsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HeardCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{NewtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PauldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PickensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PolkCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RockdaleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SpaldingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WaltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BaldwinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BibbCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BleckleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CrawfordCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DodgeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HoustonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JonesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LaurensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MonroeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PeachCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PulaskiCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PutnamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaylorCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TwiggsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UpsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Central Savannah River Area Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BurkeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColumbiaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlascockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HancockCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffersonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JenkinsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LincolnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McDuffieCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RichmondCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TaliaferroCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WarrenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WashingtonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WilkesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Coastal Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BryanCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BullochCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CandlerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChathamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EffinghamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EvansCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LibertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LongCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{McIntoshCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ScrevenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TatnallCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

North Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{CatoosaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ChattoogaCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DadeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FanninCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{FloydCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GilmerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GordonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{HabershamCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LumpkinCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MurrayCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{RabunCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{StephensCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TownsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{UnionCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WalkerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southeast Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{ApplingCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{AtkinsonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BaconCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BerrienCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrantleyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{BrooksCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CamdenCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CharltonCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ClinchCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CoffeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CookCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EcholsCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GlynnCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{JeffDavisCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LanierCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LowndesCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{PierceCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WareCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WayneCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Southwest Georgia Registered Historic Place stubs - {{BakerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{CalhounCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ColquittCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DecaturCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{DoughertyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{EarlyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{GradyCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{LeeCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MillerCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{MitchellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{SeminoleCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{TerrellCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{ThomasCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}, {{WorthCountyGA-NRHP-stub}}

Why do US States require so many counties?Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support idk but you gotta do what you gotta do - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian film actor subs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Still over 600. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support gets them off the list - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Oregon Registerd Historic Places stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Comfortably over 700, fortunately Portland has a very big chunk of these I propose the following:

Also if we are splitting by county may as well do the others for later ease

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is at over 600, could do with a trim beforeir gets any bigger, unfortunatly Texas has a lot of counties. I have based this proposal on the existing split of the geo stubs. I believe all the categories will reach 60 but not sure all the templates will be required so whoever creates this (thats probably me) should only ccreate the categories as they are needed.

Texas Registered Historic Place stubs - {{Texas-NRHP-stub}}

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should the third-to-last category be called "Irish baronet stubs" instead? idk - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually never mind; I still support the last three categories (they still need to be created btw) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iranian politician stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600 and could do with a trim, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German writer stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the folowing:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good to me! Please be sure to include WikiProjects - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German film actor subs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Canadian screen actor subs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
over 700. I propose following the US with a by decade of birth split along the lines of:

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should that be Canadian screen actor, 1960s birth stubs? Her Pegship (?) 20:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it should, Good spot, thankyou. Waacstats (talk) 20:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of speedies

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian actor stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following a sort of this category that pushed the film subcat over 600, partly because unlike other countries where we have split actors we don't have an Indian screen actor stubs to put those who do film and tv, I therefore propose the following:

And because there were a number of stage performers I propose the following, it might not yet reach 60 but should do once we sort through the parent.

Waacstats (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yemen geography substubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Yemen geography stubs is oversized; I propose these categories:

Support, that 'Amran one is going to be a pain. I feel it may be worth doing templates for all the governates so counting is easier in the future. Waacstats (talk) 07:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
West Bengal railway station stubs is oversized; I propose making a subcategory and template (Purba Bardhaman district geography stubs and {{PurbaBardhaman-railstation-stub}}) for 65 articles - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume the category should be Purba Bardhaman district railway station stubs otherwise support. Waacstats (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah you're right - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:11, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy parent category proposal

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the creation of Ibidionini stubs, which will be a subcat of Ibidionini and hold the categories Compsibidion stubs, Heterachthes stubs, and Tropidion stubs, which I believe have been incorrectly categorized as part of Neoibidionini stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:06, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks like the perm cats were changed back in October, probably some reorganistaion carried out. Waacstats (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Buprestidae sub-stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as Buprestidae-genera-stub.
I propose the following sub-stubs for Buprestidae stubs:

I feel there should be a dash in the template before genera otherwise Support Waacstats (talk) 14:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What Waacstats said. Her Pegship (?) 21:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ammonite sub-stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Ammonite stubs (1,030) is looking extra thicc; I propose splitting it off based on taxonomy:

I think it would also help to   Courtesy ping: Fadesga for this one, since he was the one who made those template redirects in the first place - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the paleo people are happy with this Support. Waacstats (talk) 13:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Epidendreae sub-stubs

edit

Epidendreae stubs is oversized; I propose breaking the category up a little more:

Pleurothallidinae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Acianthera stubs
edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.

Support all looks good. Waacstats (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Acrotaeniini stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
See here for the 125 articles awaiting the new template and subcategory of Tephritinae stubs and Acrotaeniini - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:58, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well Found Support Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals&oldid=1308484632"