Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/August

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting | Proposals

Proposals, August 2025

edit

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

edit

Crambini stubs

edit

Over 650 articles, perm cat has no sub cats however I propose th following based on links to category:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Flavobacteria stubs

edit

Safetly in the 600+ articles, I would like to propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tineidae stubs

edit

Closing in on 700 I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ulidiidae

edit

Another one pushing 700 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actinomycetota

edit

Close to 700 articles so could do with a split. I therefore propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby union orgs

edit

Not desperatly needed but will tidy up the parent categories

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per the parent cat & previous stub formats, I think this should be "Rugby union organisation stubs" and "Rugbyunion-org-stub". Her Pegship (?) 19:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good spot, I obviously didn't update my quick note to propose it properly. Waacstats (talk) 10:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So now should be Rugby union organisation stubs {{Rugbyunion-org-stub}} Waacstats (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Split of steroids

edit

Category is over 600 could do with a split

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedies

edit

This weeks over 60

Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedys

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list of new categories where the associated tempalte(s) have passed the 60 park:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Apocynaceae

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A nother one over 700 pages, I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hypsogastropoda stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This one looks reaady to split, at 668 pages and 51 categories, all the pages are already using by genus(?) templates I propose we use the next layer down that the perm cats use which would mean the following categories:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Limenitidinae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Anouther biological category with over 700 articles. I propose the following split based on perm cats:

I'm not 100% convinced on the name for the second one, I'm not convinced we need the disambig for either the template or the category but the perrm cat uses it so? anyone any ideas? Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Miridae stubs

edit

{{sfp top}create}} Another over 700, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Milesiini stubs

edit

{{sfp top}create}} Category is approaching 750 I propose the following based on names and not categories as the parent has no perm sub cats.

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Mesostigmata stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another tree of life category pushing 800, I propose the following based on perm cats:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Staphylinidae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Pushing 800 articles, I propose the following splits:

Waacstats (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few speediable categories:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Large Olympic medalists stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The Dutch, French, German, Swedish and Soviet subcats have recently grown to over 600 and I would like to cut these back a bit. A few other countries could do with a trim as well:

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sports biographies

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of Sports biographies without stub categories. I propose the following category which should be viable based on articles that have asbox (atleast one stub template).

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ascomycota stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This category has a number of large subcats, I would like to propose the following categories and templates

Waacstats (talk) 20:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cumberland geography stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, we have 2 non-metropolitan I propose using these to split them.

I have followed the article and permcat for disambiging Cumberland UA nd historic county. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Theclinae stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 700 articles, could do with a split:

All appear viable per the parent cats. Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Protein stubs

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 800 articles we already of 1 split by ___location so I thought the following would be useful, it will still be oversized but not not quite so oversized

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy categories

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
some upmerged templates that have passed the 60 mark.

and some categories each from a number of templates:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Biologist

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some refining is possible with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/2025/August&oldid=1307916718"