Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Mtmelendez in topic Hm.
Page format
I'm still unsure on whether we should follow the "endorse/oppose this summary" format, or just have threaded discussions. Any suggestions? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Makes it hard to reply with neutral or opposing comments. Adding neutral/oppose subsections to each summary would be impractical. I'd say we could leave the separate summaries, just lose the "I endorse" subsections and allow free discussion below each summary. Equazcion •✗/C • 15:13, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
- Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't see what's done, but ok :)Equazcion •✗/C • 16:15, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)- K, now I do :) Equazcion •✗/C • 16:16, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, got momentarily busy with something else in between editing. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikiquette alert for User:WebHamster
I've posted a wikiquette alert at WP:WQA#User:WebHamster. I've never done one of these before so I don't know what exactly happens next, but there it is. Equazcion •✗/C • 20:33, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Hm.
What exactly do people think to gain from this discussion? >Radiant< 23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Some sort of fair consensus on how to handle this issue, maybe? This user feels the status quo is flawed. -- Kendrick7talk 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kendrick summed it up. It doesn't hurt to have a centralized good-faithed discussion on hot topics every once in a while, does it? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)