Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faheem thalib
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) at 23:09, 12 July 2011 (Closing debate; result was Speedy delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 23:09, 12 July 2011 by Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was Speedy delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7, one author who has blanked page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Faheem thalib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet criteria of WP:BIO. Sixty-four Google results for the name, mostly directory entries. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clearly non-notable, per nom. Yunshui (talk) 14:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't find any discussion of him in reliable sources. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.