Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Input processing instructions
- Input processing instructions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article whose sole source I just removed as it was a predatory open access journal. Has been tagged since forever for notability, sourcing and orphan status. Guy (Help!) 18:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete apparently from its inventor → predatory journal →Wikipedia. No evidence of use of this term in any scholarly work and or teaching methods. –Ammarpad (talk) 08:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Trivial and mundane terminology. No evidence of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:N and GNG. Wikipedia is not a repository for indiscriminate information per WP:IINFO. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)