Draft:Brickken

Submission rejected on 5 August 2025 by S0091 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by S0091 24 days ago. Last edited by S0091 24 days ago. Ask for advice

Submission declined on 3 August 2025 by MCE89 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MCE89 27 days ago.

Submission declined on 2 August 2025 by Gheus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Gheus 27 days ago.

• Comment: I also note a previous version of this draft was G5 deleted for socking. S0091 (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

---

A spanish based company specialized in real world asset tokenization

Brickken is a real world asset tokenization company based in Barcelona, Spain.^[1] The purpose of the company is to allow businesses and individuals to launch, trade and manage tokenized real world assets with the help of a decentralized application called the Tokensuite.^[2]

History

Brickken was founded in July 2020 by Edwin mata and Dario Lo Buglio^[3]. The whitepaper of Brickken was released in June 2021.^[4] In november 2022 brickken launched a dApp (Decentralized application) called the Tokensuite, with this application users could self-tokenize their assets.^[5] This was a shift from their earlier centralized form of asset tokenization.

In april 2023 Brickken became part of the cointelegraph accelerator program, with the goal of launching content that would help in the marketing of brickken.^[6] In may that year Brickken also became a member of the Chainlink Build program, which is an initiative designed to help both early-stage and established Web3 projects grow by providing them with enhanced access to Chainlink services and technical support.^[7] In June 2024 Brickken became part of the EU regulatory sandbox, which is an initiative from the European commission to provide legal certainty for decentralized technological solutions, including blockchain, by ongoing dialogue between public institutions and private entities. ^[8] In januari 2025 brickken completed a seed funding round of €2.4 million, at this time the company was valued at €21.7 million. The strategic investors that were part in the seed funding were Psalion, Ergodic Fund, SNZ Capital, Blue Bay Ventures, Mocha, and Hodl Ventures.^[9]

Universal Real World Asset Interface

In June 2025 Brickken's head of blockchain Dario Lo Buglio launched a tokenstandard called ERC-7943 (nicknamed Universal Real World Asset Interface). The purpose of this tokenstandard is to enable Defi-protocols and applications to interact with Real World Assets in a standardized way and to make sure that they comply with regulatory requirements that are often absent in earlier tokenstandards.^[10]

References

1. "Brickken | EU Digital Finance Platform". digital-finance-platform.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
2. Cavicchioli, Marco (2025-07-22). "Brickken: tokenize your RWA in a fully compliant way". The Cryptonomist. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
3. Garcia, David Cendon (2025-01-15). "Brickken raises €2.4 million funding, becoming a rising star in RWA tokenisation". EU-Startups. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
4. "Brickken Whitepaper | Explore the Future of Asset Tokenization". www.brickken.com. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
5. "Brickken Launches Its Equity-tokenization DApp, Expanding Legacy Industry's Funding Access - Data Intelligence". 2022-12-02. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
6. "Cointelegraph accelerator program welcomes Brickken: A new step in asset tokenization". Cointelegraph. 2023-04-28. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
7. "Brickken joins Chainlink BUILD Program to drive tokenization acceptance". Cointelegraph. 2023-05-01. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
8. Releases, Press (2024-06-13). "Brickken is selected to participate in the European Blockchain Regulatory Sandbox". CoinGeek. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
9. Garcia, David Cendon (2025-01-15). "Brickken raises €2.4 million funding, becoming a rising star in RWA tokenisation". EU-Startups. Retrieved 2025-08-03.
10. Proposals, Ethereum Improvement. "ERC-7943: uRWA - Universal Real World Asset Interface". Ethereum Improvement Proposals. Retrieved 2025-08-03.