| Submission declined on 15 August 2025 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 13 August 2025 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 16 days ago. | |
Comment: Where is the significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources? And please provide better citations - not bare URLs. Paul W (talk) 19:13, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Chris Spargo | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1995[citation needed] |
| Education | University of Reading |
| Occupation(s) | videographer, filmmaker, researcher, and Youtuber |
| Years active | 2021–present |
| Website | chrisspargo.co.uk |
Chris Spargo (born 1995)[citation needed] is an English videographer, film-maker, researcher, and Youtuber.[1] He rose to prominence in 2025[according to whom?] with his series of YouTube videos "Small Questions," with a signature deadpan style of delivery, making videos on the topic of small quirks in British life and history.[citation needed] He previously worked as a videographer.[2]
In 2025, Spargo posted a video titled "Why do UK supermarkets have clock towers?"[3] [4] This lead to some media attention, including an article in the Daily Express and an interview on BBC Essex.[5] Since then, he has produced regular, short, documentary-style videos on his YouTube channel, including "Why does Reading University have a nuclear bunker?"[6] His video style - short, informative, largely on ___location discussions - has been compared to Tom Scott, who ceased to make regular videos[7] shortly before Spargo gained popularity.
References
edit- ^ https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/comment-and-opinion/chris-spargo-youtube-documentarian-solves-mundane-mysteries/702205.article
- ^ httpshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MKQNejUkA4&t=844s
- ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NHv6owsCvw
- ^ https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/2012182/people-are-only-just-realising
- ^ https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0kv9wg1
- ^ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsMYbPyBZ6A
- ^ https://gamerant.com/tom-scott-youtube-videos-retire/