Submission declined on 14 August 2025 by CoconutOctopus (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 14 August 2025 by Lemonaka (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Lemonaka 8 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 August 2025 by Reconrabbit (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Reconrabbit 9 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 August 2025 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Stuartyeates 11 days ago.
| |
Comment: Prior reviews must remain on this draft until it is accepted. If they are removed again, the user removing them will be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Need a totally rewrite for some details instead of just two comments. -Lemonaka 07:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: This article provides testimonials and advantages of DSIM over other tools, where it should instead describe what DSIM is in an unembellished way based on independent sources. -- Reconrabbit 19:08, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: We need independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
| DSIM | |
|---|---|
| Type | tool for the simulation of power electronics[1] |
| Website | www |
DSIM is a a new dedicated tool for the simulation of power electronics.[2] DSIM simulation software uses a discrete state event-driven approach, which is different from the previous time-driven approach. This simulation mechanism greatly shortens the time cost and makes the power electronics simulation more convenient. In addition, it can also simulate the transient process of switching devices, so more accurate simulation results can be obtained.[3]
Furthermore, DSIM does not need dedicated hardware. It can run on a Windows laptop. [4]
References
edit- ^ "Powersim: tool for simulation of power electronics". powerelectronicnews.com. July 2020. Retrieved 2025-08-13.
- ^ Staff, Editorial (2020-07-01). "Powersim: tool for simulation of power electronics". Power Electronics News. Retrieved 2025-08-13.
- ^ Liang, Yongtao; Chen, Jianan; Jiang, Dong (August 2021). "Comparison and Analysis of DSIM and SIMULINK Simulation Based on MMC System". 2021 IEEE 4th International Electrical and Energy Conference (CIEEC). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/CIEEC50170.2021.9510501. ISBN 978-1-7281-7149-4.
- ^ Maloney, Peter (2020-06-30). "Simulating Microgrids: New Killer Test App?". Microgrid Knowledge. Retrieved 2025-08-20.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.