Draft:MirrorWeb

Submission declined on 9 August 2025 by MediaKyle (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by MediaKyle 16 days ago. Last edited by Market-whiz 3 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 7 August 2025 by Pythoncoder (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Pythoncoder 19 days ago.

Submission declined on 29 July 2025 by Qcne (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. Declined by Qcne 28 days ago.

• Comment: Please ensure any WP:COI is addressed. Greenman (talk) 13:21, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

• Comment: AI generated slop qcne (talk) 15:16, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

---

Digital archiving and compliance platform.

MirrorWeb

Overview

MirrorWeb is a SaaS technology company that provides digital archiving and compliance solutions. Founded in 2012 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, with an additional office in Manchester, United Kingdom.^[1] Its services are used primarily by financial institutions and public sector organizations to retain records of electronic communications, websites, and social media activity.

History

MirrorWeb was founded to address the growing need for archiving digital content in regulated industries. In its early years, the company secured investment from Maven Capital Partners^[2]. In 2024, it raised €57 million in growth equity from Mainsail Partners to support product development and international expansion.^[3]

Products

The company offers a range of tools that enable the capture and supervision of digital communications.

• MirrorWeb Insight: Introduced in 2023^[4], MirrorWeb Insight is an archiving platform that captures communications from sources such as email, SMS, instant messaging applications, social media platforms, and virtual meeting software. Data is preserved in its original format to support compliance reviews.
• MirrorWeb Sentinel: Sentinel is a compliance supervision tool that includes assisted intelligence, risk scoring algorithms and detection rules for compliance monitoring. The system is designed to support regulatory requirements including those from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, FINRA, and MiFID II regulations.
• Trusted Contacts: Trusted Contacts is a mobile archiving application that captures business communications on employee personal devices while maintaining separation between business and personal data.

Regulatory Compliance

The company's solutions are designed to comply with various financial regulations, including SEC Rule 17a-4, FINRA rules, MiFID II in the European Union, and Financial Conduct Authority requirements in the United Kingdom. Features include immutable storage, retention policies, and audit reporting capabilities.

Clients

MirrorWeb's client base includes financial services firms such as registered investment advisors, broker-dealers, and asset management companies. Government clients have included The Library of Congress ^[5]and The National Archives of the United Kingdom^[6].

References

1. Marzo, Stefano De (2024-09-09). "Manchester-based MirrorWeb Raises €57 million to help firms meet their digital communications archiving needs". EU-Startups. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
2. Davies, Alex (2024-09-10). ""New exit for the Maven VCTs: Manchester-based MirrorWeb"". Wealth Club. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
3. "DC Advisory advises MirrorWeb, a portfolio company of Maven Capital Partners, on its sale to Mainsail Partners". DC Advisory. Archived from the original on 2024-10-07. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
4. Butcher, Mike (2014-04-04). "MirrorWeb Comes Up With A Simple Site Uptime Solution For SMEs". TechCrunch. Retrieved 2025-08-22.
5. Haupt Fugate, Tracee (2024-12-17). ""Can We Capture This?": An Interview on Website Archivability | The Signal". The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2025-08-07.
6. "UK Government Web Archive", Wikipedia, 2025-07-18, retrieved 2025-08-07