Draft:Physical logicism

Physical logicism is a synonym for physicalism. Physicalism relies more on explanations expressed in human language, whereas physical logicism leans more heavily on mathematical explanations. Mathematics reaches deeper into the level of logical relations and mechanisms than language does. Human language leads to erroneous classifications because it is not sufficiently logical and often results in flawed conclusions.

Both physical logicism and physicalism claim that everything that exists is logical in terms of its structure, mechanisms, and ultimate foundations. Their deepest foundation is logical accessibility itself: to be a physical system.

Supporters of physical logicism hold a variety of theories; they do not adhere to a single opinion or theory. There are multiple distinct mathematical mechanisms.

Simplistic vs. rigorous physicalism

example:

A non-rigorous physicalist doesn't explain that not all the cells comprising the brain, contribute to thinking at the same degree. A rigorous physicalist rigorously explains that different cells contribute at different degrees to thinking, and also he describes specific mechanisms. Thus personhood (the state of being a person) and consciousness isn't the stationary cells and neurotransmitters but the functional cells well organized and correctly performing tasks. For a very rigorous physicalist the question "Are we the matter comprising us or the introspective experience we have?" becomes more specific and mechanistic. We are procedurally yielded. Simplistic mainstream physicalism is overemphasizing simple biases, whilst rigorous physicalism procedurally explains (using multidisciplinary rigorous explanations) mechanisms/procedures. We are what our body can yield to procedurally make an experience of selfhood. Physical weakness for any reason can impair the yielding of the self. Simple physicalism is biased and tries to impose simplistic answers or simplistic ambivalences, but the actual world is procedural and we have to rigorously explain all the involved procedures. The description of reality must be honest and include all the parameters.

The fact that we perceive people as distinct entities, doesn't mean that a simplified overall definition of their state is accurate. This is a misconception and a simplification bias.