Submission declined on 25 August 2025 by CNMall41 (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 12 January 2025 by Vrxces (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Vrxces 7 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 4 October 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 10 months ago.
| |
| Submission rejected on 26 March 2024 by Jovanmilic97 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Jovanmilic97 17 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 3 February 2023 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 8 September 2022 by Jovanmilic97 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Jovanmilic97 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 February 2022 by Rusalkii (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rusalkii 3 years ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 31 December 2021 by Rusalkii (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rusalkii 3 years ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 12 December 2020 by Zxcvbnm (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Zxcvbnm 4 years ago.
| |
Comment: I do not see any improvement since last decline. We need to see significant coverage in reliable sources in order for this to be notable for Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: For an upcoming game in development for six years, there is just not enough WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV to suggest notability at this point in time. Consider seeing if there has been coverage from sources like those in WP:VG/S ahead of release to support notability. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: play.google.com is a primary source and cannot be used to establish any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 11:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: While this version reads less like an advertisement, the notability issues still persist and no new references have been added since. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 07:50, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Putting aside the fact that all references come from the websites of questionable reliability, 2 out of those are rewordings/copy of WP:ROUTINE release date announcement. On top of that, Downloadable Content section contains pricings for each one, which is WP:PROMO and should be removed. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources are wikis and app/game store listings, neither of which count towards notability. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Not enough sources to satisfy notability requirements. No reception section at all. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
| Spaceflight Simulator | |
|---|---|
 Logo since Update 1.5 | |
| Publisher(s) | Štefo Mai Morojna |
| Programmer(s) |
|
| Composer(s) |
|
| Engine | Unity |
| Platform(s) | |
| Release | iOS, iPadOS
|
| Genre(s) | Space flight simulation |
| Mode(s) | Single-player |
Spaceflight Simulator is a 2D space flight simulation video game developed and published by Štefo Mai Morojna for iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows. In the game, players build rockets to explore different planets. The game features a realistic orbital physics engine, allowing for various real-life orbital maneuvers such as Hohmann transfer orbits and bi-elliptic transfer orbits. As of July 2024, the game has more than 10 million downloads on Google Play.[1]
The game features a 1:20 scale and a 1:1 of the Solar System, which includes the Sun, the inner planets and their satellites. There is a DLC that adds Jupiter and the Galilean moons. The game also supports adding modified planets and parts, with mods for the PC version only.[2]
On June 5th and 6th, 2020, the 1.5 Foundation Update was released, reworking the base of the game, and allowing more content to be added in the future. There are no plans to release on Xbox and Playstation, but the developer has said that they will bring it to the Nintendo Switch in the future.[2]
Gameplay
editWhen they enter the game a player can create worlds, choosing a name and solar system. Difficulties go from Easy (1:20 scale), Hard (1:10 scale), and Realistic (1:1 scale). Realistic is only available on PC. Both sandbox and challenge mode are available along with various cheats. A third mode known as career mode was in beta, but never finished development, and is only available as a prototype
In the build menu players can drag parts of various sizes and uses together to build rockets. Symmetry and staging options are available. Players can save their builds as "blueprints" and enable various cheats.
When a player launches a rocket they start on a launch pad on Earth. The player can activate and deactivate parts by clicking on the part itself, such as Engines and Reaction Control Systems (RCS) or using staging. Players can timewarp and there is also a map that shows every object the player has launched in that world, celestial objects, atmospheres, orbits, and object names. The map also includes a docking assist.
From here, gameplay is a sandbox. Popular projects include building space stations, rovers, crewed return missions, and surface bases There are three video tutorials to help the player, along with the in-game tutorial.[3]
Development
editVersions
editThe game was created by Štefo Mai Morojna as a job application for the development team of Kerbal Space Program, which was declined.[4]
Štefo teased an upcoming water update and astronauts in 2023, although as of May 2024, there has been no conformation of any updates.
| Version no. | Release Date | Changelogs |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 30/11/2017 | Initial public release |
| 1.1 | Reworked building
Added new parts Bigger build space | |
| 1.3 | Improved building | |
| 1.31 | Added wheel
Added a docking tutorial | |
| 1.35 | Added electrical parts and rocket sharing (Later removed)
Added fuel transfering | |
| 1.4 | Adaptable tanks and fairings | |
| 1.5 Foundation Update | Added worlds and custom solar systems
Graphical changes | |
| 1.52 | Improved staging
Add rocket naming Allowed movement of multiple parts at once | |
| 1.5.3 | Added heat damage and reentry effects
Added physics time warp | |
| 1.5.4 Infinite Build Area Update | 2022 | Added Infinite Build Area DLC |
| 1.5.4.3 | 2022 | Added clipping cheat
Engines are now affected by heat damage |
| 1.5.6 | 2022 | Added space centre |
| 1.5.7 | 2022 | Timewarp here button |
| 1.5.8 | 2023 | Added Redstone-Atlas DLC |
| 1.5.9 | 2023 | Added docking assist
Added round fairings |
| 1.5.10 | June 2023 | Added challenge and hard modes
Added captured asteroid |
Sequel
editOn 12th September 2024, Štefo Mai Morojna released an annoucement trailer on YouTube about the sequel.[5] The sequel was later said to be released in 2025.
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "spaceflight simulator - Android Apps on Google Play". play.google.com. Retrieved 6 May 2024.
- ^ a b Shadow, Gray. "Spaceflight Simulator Touches Down on Steam Early Access Jan. 25". Noobfeed. Adam Siddiqui. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
- ^ "Spaceflight Simulator Preview". Thumb Culture. 23 March 2022. Retrieved 8 September 2022.
- ^ Rivera, C. Anthony (12 October 2021). "Spaceflight Simulator Travels Between the Stars Next Year in Early Access". The Nerd Stash. Retrieved 8 September 2022. [dead link]
- ^ SpaceflightSimulator - Official (12 September 2024). Spaceflight Simulator 2 Sequel Announcement Trailer. Retrieved 15 April 2025 – via YouTube.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.