Wikipedia

Draft:Water Management at Angkor

Water Management at Angkor

edit

Angkor, the capital of the Khmer Empire (9th–15th century CE), is known for its impressive temples and architecture. However, it has also represented one of the most sophisticated premodern hydraulic engineering achievements.[1][2] Mapping has shown that this impressive city lay upon a vast network of reservoirs, channels, barays, and embankments built between the 9th–13th centuries, and covering over 1000 km².[3] Excavations revealed further masonry structures that provided integral components to the system, displaying a well-designed network.[4] This shows that the inhabitants of Angkor were able to systematically distribute water across their landscape on an enormous scale. Scholars argue that this “hydraulic city”, and its maintenance, played a central role in the rise and fall of Angkor.[5]

Historical Development

edit

The Khmer kings were integral in the creation of these large-scale hydrological works. Indravarman I (r. 877–889 CE) inscribed upon the Preah Ko temple of his plans to dig five days after his coronation, resulting in the creation of the Indratataka reservoir.[6] This man-made lake covered an area of 3.8 km by 900 m, supplying water to the capital of Hariharalaya. This was the first large-scale effort to reshape the landscape to a hydraulic system.

Subsequent rulership saw the expansion of this water network. Yasovarman I (r. 889–910 CE) constructed the East Baray, which measured 7 km by 1.8 km to align with his new capital, Yasodharapura.[7] This became a model for subsequent rulers who wished to associate themselves with hydraulic monuments.

Under Suryavarman I (r. 1006–1050 CE) and successors, the network was further expanded with embankments, canals, and the West Baray, which remains one of the largest manually dug reservoirs at 8 km by 2 km.[8] These monuments were not just built to be functional, but were also symbolic, linking kingship and divine authority over land and water.[9]

By the 12th and 13th centuries, the system had continuously been maintained, adapted, and modified, suggesting ongoing central investment in sustaining the city.[2]

Structure and Components

edit

Barays

edit

The barays were rectangular vast reservoirs that aligned with the capitals and temple complexes. While their function is still contested, evidence suggests multiple roles, including water storage, ritual symbolism, and support of agriculture.[1]

  • East Baray: Containing the East Mebon temple on an island and storing approximately 50–55 million m³ of water, this baray served not only as water storage but as a ceremonial center.[7]
  • West Baray: One of the largest manually dug reservoirs globally, its capacity exceeds 50 million m³. The central West Mebon temple sits atop its platform, demonstrating use for both cosmological and hydraulic purposes.[3]
  • North Baray (Jayatataka): Included an elevated feeder canal, exemplifying precise water management and urban planning. Still contributes to local irrigation today.[4]
  • Smaller barays and moats existed through the cities, near residential and temple areas to supply water for everyday and ritual function.[6]

Canals and Channels

edit

A network of canals connected reservoirs, rivers, and agricultural fields. These regulated flow and replenished fields during the dry seasons, which allowed for multiple cropping cycles in rice agriculture and diverted excess water during monsoons.[3] The Siem Reap River was integrated into the canal network, distributing water to the East and West Barays as well as the surrounding rice fields. Archaeological studies show feeder canals with sluice gates controlling water levels, demonstrating sophisticated engineering.[1]

Embankments and Spillways

edit

Earthen and masonry embankments controlled the water levels preventing flooding, while directing water to urban and agricultural areas. Spillways were designed to safely release surplus water during the monsoon floods, implemented in the West Baray which overflowed into the Siem Reap River.[8]

Moats and Ponds

edit

Temple moats were used to symbolise the cosmic ocean surrounding Mount Meru and supplied urban water.[9] Residential ponds offered water for domestic and ritual usage. The Royal Palace (Angkor Thom) contained moats and ponds that formed a regulated water circulation system.[7]

Functions and Uses

edit

Agriculture

edit

The hydraulic network irrigated Angkor’s extensive rice fields, with the barays functioning as a water storage system for the wet and dry seasons, enabling supplementary irrigation throughout droughts.[3] This can be seen at West Baray, where water was channelled through feeder canals to irrigate the surrounding fields, with overflow helping to replenish smaller ponds and reservoirs.[1]

The East Baray similarly irrigated rice fields adjacent to Yasodharapura, which supported food production for the urban population and the royal court.[6] Smaller reservoirs and ponds within the temple complexes contributed to localized agricultural irrigation, particularly for wet-season crops.[2]

Flood Control

edit

By storing monsoon runoff, the reservoirs prevented uncontrolled flooding across urban and agricultural zones. Their network of interconnected channels and spillways allowed for excess water to be released in a controlled manner, protecting temples, palaces, and residential regions from inundation.[8] Sediment analysis from the West Baray shows periodic scouring and deposition consistent with controlled water management during high rainfall events.[10]

Religious and Political Symbolism

edit

Barays and canals were integral to cosmological and political ideology, with temples built on central islands within barays to symbolise Mount Meru and the cosmic ocean.[9] The construction and maintenance of these reservoirs was a way for kings to demonstrate divine authority as providers of fertility, prosperity and order to their kingdom.[7]

The West Baray, with its central West Mebon temple, exemplifies this integration, functioning as both a storage reservoir and a ritual focal point for ceremony related to agricultural fertility and kingship.[6]

Adaptation and Challenges

edit

The Angkorian hydraulic network was maintained over centuries through periodic repairs, such as the rerouting of channels and the construction of new embankments.[4] However, its large scale made the system vulnerable to extreme climatic events. Sediment core evidence indicates that droughts and floods caused stress to the system, resulting in some embankments and canals failing under prolonged monsoon extremes.[10]

Role in the Decline of Angkor

edit

Water management has been suggested as a contributing factor to the decline of Angkor in the 14th–15th centuries.[2][10] Climatic studies showed decades-long droughts with intermittent episodes of intense flooding. These stresses likely damaged Angkor’s canals and embankments, making repair at a large scale difficult.[8] Evidence from sediments in the West Baray suggests that erosion and siltation reduced the storage capacity during this period.[10]

The weakening of the hydraulic system, along with growing regional competition, including the rise of Ayutthaya in Thailand, saw the abandonment of Angkor as the royal centre in the mid-15th century, though its temples remained as important religious sites.[6]

Legacy

edit

Angkor’s hydraulic system remains one of the most sophisticated premodern water management systems globally.[3] The study of it helps inform broader debates about urban resilience, sustainability, and collapse, with today’s archaeologists emphasizing that the decline of the nation was not sudden, but a long process of urban decline.[1][5] This occurred with water management assisting in both its flourishment and its contraction.






References

edit
  1. ^ a b c d e Fletcher, R. (2008). "The Limits of Settlement Growth: A Theoretical Outline". In Marcus, J.; Sabloff, J. (eds.), The Ancient City: New Perspectives on Urbanism in the Old and New World. Santa Fe: SAR Press, pp. 273–298.
  2. ^ a b c d Evans, D. (2012). "Putting Angkor on the Map: A New Survey of a Khmer ‘Hydraulic City’ in Historical and Theoretical Context". In K. Lustig (ed.), New Perspectives in Southeast Asian and Pacific Prehistory. Terra Australis 36. Canberra: ANU E Press, pp. 149–164.
  3. ^ a b c d e Evans, D., et al. (2007). "A Comprehensive Archaeological Map of the World’s Largest Preindustrial Settlement Complex at Angkor, Cambodia". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (36): 14277–14282.
  4. ^ a b c Pottier, C. (1999). Carte archéologique de la région d’Angkor. Zone sud. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient.
  5. ^ a b Lucero, L. (2006). Water and Ritual: The Rise and Fall of Classic Maya Rulers. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 177–182 (comparative discussion of Angkor).
  6. ^ a b c d e Higham, C. (2014). Early Mainland Southeast Asia: From First Humans to Angkor. Bangkok: River Books, pp. 371–375.
  7. ^ a b c d Jacques, C. & Freeman, M. (1997). Angkor: Cities and Temples. Bangkok: River Books, pp. 84–87.
  8. ^ a b c d Groslier, B.P. (1979). "La cité hydraulique angkorienne: exploitation ou surexploitation du sol?". Bulletin de l'École française d’Extrême-Orient. 66(1): 161–202.
  9. ^ a b c Mabbett, I. (1978). "The ‘Indianization’ of Southeast Asia: Reflections on the Historical Sources". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 8 (1): 1–14.
  10. ^ a b c d Buckley, B. et al. (2010). "Climate as a Contributing Factor in the Demise of Angkor, Cambodia". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107 (15): 6748–6752.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Water_Management_at_Angkor&oldid=1308034218"