Wikipedia

Draft:Welding Cobots


Cobot Welding

edit

Collaborative robot welding (or cobot welding) refers to using a collaborative robot (cobot) to perform arc welding tasks in human-shared workspaces. Unlike traditional industrial welding robots — which typically operate at high speed and are separated from humans by safety fences — cobot welders are designed with force-limited joints, sensors, and control systems that allow safe interaction with human operators. In practice, a welding cobot combines a lightweight robotic arm (often 5–10 kg payload) with a welding power supply and torch, along with user-friendly software for programming. This enables manufacturers (especially small and medium-sized shops) to automate welds with relatively simple setup and direct human collaboration.[1]

Traditional robotic welding originated in the 1960s–1980s (e.g. the GM Unimate in the 1960s), but those systems were typically large, fast, and required fences to protect nearby workers. In contrast, cobots “work alongside human welders” without fixed barriers. For example, early guides note that traditional robotic welders have “high-speed operations and lack sensing capabilities,” so they must be caged off; cobots instead use built-in sensing and compliant control to achieve safety and ease of use.

History

edit

The concept of the collaborative robot (cobot) emerged in the mid-1990s. Early work by J. Edward Colgate and Michael Peshkin (Northwestern Univ., 1996) introduced robots intended for direct human interaction. The first industrial cobot products appeared in the late 2000s; notably, Universal Robots (Denmark) released the UR5 in 2008, one of the first cost-effective, user-friendly cobot arms.[2] Over the 2010s, cobots spread into many tasks (assembly, pick-and-place, etc.), and researchers began exploring welding specifically.

Cobots applied to welding arose later than traditional robot welders. The first wave of cobot welding systems appeared around 2017, when the SwitchWeld welding cobot was first debuted at FABTECH, and were focused on simple GMAW (MIG) tasks. These early cobot welders were typically air-cooled and intended for light-duty welding. By the early 2020s, more capable versions emerged: systems with water-cooled torches that could handle higher currents and longer duty cycles were demonstrated. For example, a 2023 review notes that advances in torch cooling and control enable modern cobot welders to perform heavy welding tasks that older cobots could not. In recent years, cobot welding has diversified further: beyond MIG/MAG, manufacturers have introduced collaborative TIG (GTAW) and even laser welding cells, as well as automated spot-welding cells using cobots. In sum, cobot welding technology evolved from its origins in the late 2010s (initially addressing “low-hanging fruit” welding tasks) into more powerful and versatile systems by the early 2020s.[3]

Technical Overview

edit

A cobot welding system typically consists of four main components:

  • Cobot arm: A 4–6-axis collaborative robot, often mounted on a base or mobile cart. Cobots (such as UR’s UR5e/UR10e, AUBO-i5, Yaskawa HC10, FANUC CRX, etc.) have force sensors in their joints and power-and-force-limiting (PFL) modes that detect collisions. The arm carries the welding torch as its end effector. Cobots are noted for their slim wrists and high repeatability, enabling them to access narrow joints while bearing welding torches and cables.[4]
  • Welding power supply and torch: An arc welding power unit (MIG, TIG, plasma or laser) supplies current and wire feed. The welder and torch are integrated with the cobot via a control interface. Many cobots can “integrate with almost all weld packages,” meaning their control software includes built-in libraries to talk to common welding machines and set parameters (voltage, wire speed, gas flow).
  • Sensors and auxiliary tools: Cobots use various sensors to improve welding quality and safety. Internally, joint torque/force sensors enable collision detection and compliant motion. Externally, optional sensors such as arc-voltage (through-the-arc seam tracking), touch probes, laser scanners or vision cameras allow the cobot to locate weld seams and maintain torch alignment. For example, many systems offer “through-arc seam tracking” and vision-guided welding so that the robot can automatically find and follow the weld joint.
  • Software and user interface: Cobot welders are typically programmed via a teach pendant or graphical interface. Modern systems use welding-specific UI (“ArcTool” on FANUC, the Vectis “Let’s Weld Together” app with UR, the SwitchWeld "Arc Advisor", etc.) that present welding parameters in common terms, allowing users to “simply select and weld”. Cobots support hand-guided teaching: an operator can put the arm into “freedrive” mode and physically move it along a weld path to record points. Offline programming and simulation tools (e.g. FANUC’s WeldPRO) can also generate and optimize weld paths from CAD models.[5]

System integration may involve mounting the cobot on a work cart or integrating external axes (e.g. positioners, rails) for larger parts. For example, some turnkey cobot welding cells come pre-mounted on a mobile cart with built-in fixtures and on-board power hookups. Integration also includes safety systems (see below) and communication with plant controls. Overall, a cobot welding station blends traditional arc welding equipment with a force-sensitive robot platform and user-friendly control software.

Applications

edit

Cobot welders are used across many industries, especially where flexibility or human collaboration is important. Key application areas include:

  • Automotive and transportation: Welding of body panels, chassis parts, exhaust components and other subassemblies. Cobots can handle repetitive welds on small parts (brackets, frames) and are used by Tier-1 suppliers and repair shops alike.
  • Aerospace: Fabrication of aircraft components or structural assemblies where high precision and certification requirements exist. Aerospace producers use cobots for moderate-volume welds (e.g. wing sections, fuselage brackets) where human oversight is needed.
  • Metal fabrication and heavy equipment: Industries like construction equipment, cranes, farm machinery, and pressure vessels use cobot welders for stiffeners, small assemblies, and post-weld tasks. Cobots are suited for welding tasks on large structures that can be presented to the robot (for instance, the robot may weld on a smaller subassembly of a large frame).
  • Appliances and consumer goods: Manufacturers of ovens, appliances, HVAC components, and recreational vehicles use cobot welding to produce repeated weldments (grills, frames, tanks) with consistent quality.
  • Contract and small-batch welding: Job shops and SMEs (small and medium enterprises) with varied production benefit greatly from cobots. Cobots are ideal for “high-mix, low-volume” welding – prototyping, custom parts, or jobs requiring frequent reprogramming.
  • Education and research: Training programs and labs use welding cobots to teach robotics and welding integration, due to their safety features and flexibility.[6]

For example, Vectis, SwitchWeld, and Hirebotics' cobot welding tools are marketed as portable cells that shops can set up quickly, while Yaskawa’s HC10XP cobot is promoted for supplementing manual welders on large workpieces. In general, cobot welding finds users wherever a manufacturer needs automation without dedicating a full industrial robot cell, or where a human may still intervene in the process.

Benefits and Limitations

edit

Advantages

edit

Collaborative welding robots offer several notable benefits:

  • Safety and ergonomics: Cobots take over repetitive and hazardous tasks (exposure to fumes, arc light, heavy arm fatigue). Welders can remain outside the robot’s work envelope or wear minimal protective clothing, improving ergonomics. Studies report reduced welder eye strain and physical fatigue when using cobots.
  • Consistent quality: Cobots deliver high repeatability. Once programmed, a cobot produces uniform weld beads over long shifts, reducing defects and rework. Improved consistency also reduces scrap rates.[7][8]
  • Ease of use and quick deployment: Unlike traditional robots that require specialized programming, cobots often support intuitive teaching (hand-guiding, wizard-driven interfaces). Many operations can start welding within hours of setup. Lower engineering effort makes cobots accessible to shops without dedicated robot teams.
  • Flexibility and ROI: Cobots excel in flexible automation. They are relatively low-cost (often \$50–120k all-in for a basic cell) and pay back quickly for repetitive tasks. Research and case studies note that even for short production runs, a cobot can be cost-effective by boosting throughput and freeing human welders for other work. Cobots can be redeployed between jobs, offering more versatility than fixed industrial cells.[9]
  • Skilled labor augmentation: With a global shortage of welders, cobots can alleviate workforce pressure. They allow less-experienced personnel to run automated welds under supervision, leveraging human oversight without needing full welding skill.

Limitations

edit

Cobot welding also has inherent constraints:

  • Reduced speed and power: Cobots are generally slower and lower-powered than high-end industrial robots. They have lower maximum torches currents (often up to \~300–500 A) and shorter duty cycles (especially older models). For high-volume, high-amperage welding (e.g. thick multi-pass welds) a dedicated industrial robot or multiple passes may still be preferable. Early cobot systems were air-cooled and unsuited for heavy work, although many modern cobots now support water-cooled torches.[10]
  • Limited reach and payload: Cobots typically have modest reach (\~1–1.5 m) and payload (5–20 kg). They struggle with very large or heavy parts that exceed their workspace. For example, welding long pipes or large frames that cannot be easily reoriented may be impractical for a cobot. Also, cobots lack the fine dexterity of human welders for confined joints (they cannot “crouch inside” structures to weld inner corners).[11]
  • Batch size economics: Case studies show cobots are most cost-effective for medium batch sizes. They are often **not** economical for extremely low volumes (single-piece jobs) or very high volumes where a high-speed dedicated robot yields greater throughput. Essentially, very small or very large runs may still favor manual welding or industrial robots, respectively.
  • Process limitations: Arc stability can be more sensitive with cobots. Some metal-heavy or specialized processes (e.g. friction stir, electron beam) are currently outside typical cobot scope. In addition, cobots often require better fixturing: they cannot “handhold” parts like a human, so jigs or positioners are needed to secure workpieces. Integration of sensors (e.g. seam tracking) can mitigate these issues, but adds complexity.[12][13]

In sum, cobot welding trade-offs involve sacrificing some speed/power for increased safety and flexibility. For many shops, the ergonomic and economic gains outweigh the reduced performance, especially in high-mix, lower-volume contexts.

edit

Collaborative welding robots are gaining traction worldwide, though adoption varies by region and industry. According to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR), Asia leads in robot density: South Korea, Japan, China, and Singapore are top adopters of automation. China alone has seen its robot density double in recent years. Europe also shows strong growth; the EU average robot density reached ~219 robots per 10,000 manufacturing workers (with Germany, Sweden and others high-ranking). North America is growing fast too – the U.S. rose to 295 robots per 10,000 by 2023 – as American manufacturers, especially in automotive and aerospace, invest in automation.[14]

While these stats cover all robots, cobots are a notable and rapidly expanding subset. The IFR reports that cobots accounted for about 10.5% of all new industrial robot installations worldwide in 2023. Cobot penetration tends to be highest in industries needing flexibility (e.g. automotive parts, electronics, aerospace) and in sectors facing labor shortages. For example, automotive suppliers use cobots for lower-volume model variants, and metal fabricators use them to automate welds that would otherwise be manual.[15]

Market analyses project robust growth in cobot welding. One industry guide notes the global welding robot market is expected to exceed $9 billion by 2025, with cobot systems capturing a growing share. Another report indicates Asia-Pacific leads regionally (≈40% of the cobot welding market), with North America and Europe also expanding rapidly. Key drivers include shrinking skilled-welder workforce (e.g. the U.S. may need >320,000 new welders by 2029), increasingly high-mix manufacturing needs, and falling cobot costs.

In summary, all major regions are moving toward cobot welding: Asia’s vast manufacturing base drives early adoption, Europe’s industrial focus and labor costs spur cobot use, and the U.S. sees rapid growth among SMEs. Industry trends emphasize smart manufacturing (connecting cobots to IoT data and AI tools), flexible production, and human–robot collaboration as components of next-generation factories.[16]

Academic and Research Contributions

edit

Cobot welding is an active research area in robotics and manufacturing engineering. Recent peer-reviewed studies cover system design, control methods, human–robot interaction (HRI), and sensing innovations:

  • Collaborative HRC welding systems: Yue Cao et al. (2024) provide a comprehensive review of human–robot collaborative (HRC) technologies for assembly and welding. They describe how integrating “human sensors” (e.g. force feedback) with environmental sensing and interactive interfaces can improve welding productivity and enable tasks that neither humans nor robots alone could perform. The review highlights the state of the art in multi-modal sensing (vision, touch) and intelligent interfaces for collaborative welding.[17]
  • Intuitive teaching and interface design: A study by Ferraguti et al. (2022) introduced MyWelder, a collaborative MIG/MAG welding system. MyWelder combined a 6-axis cobot with a custom app and hand-guided teaching. In validation tests with professional welders, MyWelder produced smoother, more accurate welds than manual welding and tripled throughput on repeated weld tasks. The authors note that their system achieved “high productivity even with small production batches” via easy programming and robust control.[18]
  • Seam tracking and sensing: Research on welding-specific sensors is prominent. For example, many groups study automated seam detection (e.g. laser line scanning, vision) so that cobots can adaptively follow weld joints. Industry articles report the addition of touch sensors, through-arc seam tracking, and vision to cobot welders for real-time path correction. These sensing methods are crucial for maintaining arc consistency on imperfect parts.
  • Process control and AI: Investigators explore embedding AI and machine learning into welding control. For instance, work on “intelligent welding systems” examines how big data and AI can optimize weld parameters in real time. Studies also address advanced motion planning and collision avoidance algorithms that allow safe and flexible collaboration.[19]
  • Ergonomics and ROI studies: Case analyses (e.g. from Fraunhofer and universities) evaluate the human factors of welding cobots. One survey identified benefits such as reduced fume exposure and lower ergonomic strain for workers, while also discussing barriers like complexity of setting up jigs or limitations on small batch economics. Such research helps quantify when cobots improve shop-floor productivity and quality.[20][21]

Overall, the academic literature on cobot welding spans both fundamental robotics (sensor-based control, HRI frameworks) and application studies (system prototypes, field trials). These contributions guide future improvements in sensing, control algorithms, and human–machine interfaces for welding tasks.

Major Companies and Products

edit

Several robotics and welding equipment companies now offer collaborative welding solutions. Notable examples include:

  • AUBO Robotics USA: This American cobot maker sells collaborative arms and turnkey solutions. Its AUBO-i5 and i10 robots have been combined with welding equipment developed by SwitchWeld to make a cobot welder specifically for fab shops new to automation.
  • Universal Robots (UR): UR (Denmark) is the leading cobot manufacturer. Its UR series arms (e.g. UR5e, UR10e) are widely used with welding attachments. For example, Vectis Automation markets the *Vectis Cobot Welding Tool*, a turnkey MIG welding cart powered by a UR10e arm. (Universal Robots reports over 75,000 cobot arms deployed globally, many in welding applications.)
  • Yaskawa Motoman: Yaskawa’s HC10XP (10 kg payload) cobot is explicitly promoted for welding. Its tooling includes a through-arm gas and cable routing and a power-and-force limiting design, enabling safe hand-guided teaching of weld paths. Yaskawa also provides standard weld interfaces (the Universal Weldcom Interface, UWI) so the cobot can control any brand of power supply.
  • FANUC: FANUC (Japan) offers the CRX series of cobot arms (payloads 10–30 kg) adapted for welding. FANUC markets complete cobot welding packages with its ArcTool software. Their technical literature emphasizes “plug-and-play” integration with welders and sensor options (touch sensing, seam tracking) for easy setup.
  • ABB: ABB’s collaborative robot portfolio (YuMi, GoFa, SWIFTI) can be used for welding when equipped with arc-torch end-effectors. While ABB’s cobots were originally targeted at pick/assemble tasks, in 2021 ABB launched welding-focused cobot demos and works with partners to integrate its cobots into arc welding cells.
  • Lincoln Electric: In 2021 Lincoln Electric (U.S. weld equipment maker) launched the “Cooper” cobot welder, in partnership with an integrator. Cooper is essentially a Universal Robots arm with Lincoln’s MIG welding power source, all controllable through a tablet interface. (Lincoln’s package is designed for fenceless operation.)
  • Miller Electric: Miller (U.S.) offers the *PerformArc* series, which includes collaborative MIG/TIG welding stations. These combine Miller power supplies with AUBO cobot arms and teach pendants tuned for welding.
  • Panasonic Welding Systems: Panasonic provides “Tawers-W” compact welding robots; some models incorporate force-sensing to work safely near humans.
  • Others: Companies like Fronius and ABB partner with cobot manufacturers to offer “cobot cells” (e.g. Fronius’s TPS/i series with UR). Many system integrators (e.g. Esab, Comau, Techman) also sell collaborative welding cells under their own branding.

In summary, most major industrial robot vendors have cobot models applied to welding, either directly or via partners. SwitchWeld, Miller, Hirebotics, and Yaskawa are often cited as examples of fully integrated cobot welding products. FANUS and SwitchWeld explicitly advertises e"asy programming” cobot welders. Other cobot suppliers (e.g. KUKA, Doosan, Teradyne) and welding OEMs (Lincoln, Fronius) are expanding their offerings in this space.

Safety and Standards

edit

Safety is critical in cobot welding due to the added hazards of arc welding. Collaborative robots must comply with both robotics safety standards and welding safety practices. Key standards include:

  • ISO 10218-1 & 10218-2: These are the international standards for industrial robot safety (parts 1 and 2). They specify requirements for robot construction, protective measures, and safe integration of robot cells. Cobot systems must meet these when in collaborative mode.
  • ISO/TS 15066: This technical specification provides guidelines for human–robot collaboration, including allowable contact forces and safety-rated control modes. It addresses how to assess and mitigate the risk of human–robot contact. Welding cobots operate under ISO/TS 15066 guidelines (for example, using power-and-force limiting modes).
  • ISO 15011 series (or ANSI Z49.1): Welding-specific safety standards cover hazards like UV radiation, fumes, and spatter. For instance, ISO 15011 (Safety in welding) and ANSI Z49.1 (Safety in Welding, Cutting and Brazing) set requirements for ventilation, personal protection, and fire prevention. These apply equally to cobot welding cells, requiring measures such as welding curtains or shields, fume extractors, and appropriate PPE whenever the robot is welding.
  • Other standards: National standards (e.g. ANSI/RIA R15.08 in the U.S.) and machinery directives (e.g. EU’s Machinery Directive) also apply. OSHA and CE regulations would mandate risk assessments and safety functions. In practice, cobot welding cells often include collision-detection sensors, hand-guided teach modes, and multiple emergency-stop buttons to enhance safety.[22]

Notably, cobot welding systems incorporate advanced safety features by design. The robot’s control software enforces limits on speed and force, and built-in sensors detect unexpected collisions. For example, if a cobot arm contacts a human or obstacle, it immediately halts or retracts. Hand-guiding modes allow an operator to manually guide the arm at very low speed for programming without risk. Safety-rated stop buttons enable rapid shutdown in an emergency. These measures, together with compliance to the ISO standards above, ensure that cobots can share a workspace with welders without the need for conventional guarding.

However, welding cobots must also protect against arc-specific dangers. The intense light and UV radiation of welding require that any nearby people (including the weld operator) use proper eye protection. Automated solutions may use tinted viewing windows or robotic arc flicker suppression, but for most cobots, a welding mask is still necessary. Fume extraction must be implemented to remove welding smoke, especially since cobots may weld continuously. In essence, cobot weld cells combine robotic safety (ISO 10218/15066) with traditional welding shop safety practices (ventilation, fire control, PPE). When both sets of rules are followed, cobot welding has been shown to meet stringent safety requirements in industry.[23]

Future Outlook

edit

Cobot welding is poised for continued evolution as several emerging technologies mature:

  • Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Next-generation cobots will incorporate AI to become more autonomous and intuitive. Manufacturers are already developing machine-learning systems that let cobots “learn” from experience. For example, future welding cobots might use computer vision and adaptive control to detect weld defects in real time or adjust parameters on the fly. Human–robot interaction is also expected to improve: natural language processing (voice commands) and gesture recognition may allow operators to teach or command welds more intuitively. Research prototypes have demonstrated cobots that adapt speeds or paths based on human coworker movements or spoken instructions, reducing programming complexity.[24]
  • Cloud Connectivity and Data Analytics: “Cloud robotics” will bring new capabilities. Cobots connected to the cloud can stream welding data for real-time monitoring and analytics. This enables predictive maintenance (scheduling service before a robot fails) and fleet management (optimizing schedules across multiple robots). Integration with manufacturing execution systems (MES) and enterprise software could allow a welding cobot to automatically adjust jobs based on inventory or quality metrics. In the future, factory managers may remotely supervise cobot welders from tablets, drawing on cloud-based optimization algorithms.[25]
  • Advanced Diagnostics: Sensors and software will provide more sophisticated weld diagnostics. For instance, combining arc voltage sensing with seam geometry data could alert the operator to part misalignment or material inconsistencies before they cause a defect. AI-powered vision systems might eventually recognize weld spatter or penetration in real time and correct for it.
  • Human–Robot Collaboration Research: Academic work on Industry 5.0 envisions collaborative systems where human skill and robot precision are symbiotic. Cobot welding will benefit from these trends, including wearable devices that measure human intent or enhanced safety skins on robots. Studies continue on the best ways to train and involve human welders in the loop.
  • Workforce and Training: As cobot adoption grows, industry will require new training programs. Welders will increasingly need skills in robot programming and automation. Integrated training platforms (virtual reality simulators, robot welding trainers) are likely to appear. The American Welding Society and others already emphasize training welders on robot interfaces.

Overall, the outlook is for welding cobots to become smarter, more connected, and more widely used. Cobots will not replace industrial robots for very high-volume welding, but they will complement them in smaller, flexible tasks. With AI and cloud tools, cobot welding is expected to move toward simpler setup, higher reliability, and real-time quality assurance. Many experts believe this will make robotic welding accessible to nearly any shop, finally integrating welding into the broader Industry 4.0 (“smart factory”) trend.

Key Takeaways

edit
  • Cobot welding uses lightweight robots with sensing and force-limiting to collaborate safely with humans in welding applications.
  • Cobots emerged after 2010; welding-specific cobots became practical around 2017 with the SwitchWeld Navigator system, and later expanded to other processes.
  • A typical cobot welder combines a 6-axis arm, welding power supply (MIG/TIG), torch and sensors, and user-friendly programming interfaces.
  • Industries using cobot welders include automotive, aerospace, metal fabrication, appliances, and job shops. Cobots are especially valuable for small-batch, high-mix production.
  • Benefits: easier programming, improved ergonomics, consistent weld quality, and lower capital cost vs. traditional robot cells. Limitations: lower speed/power and limited reach — not ideal for very heavy-duty or extremely high-volume welding.
  • Cobot welding is growing globally. Cobots made up ~10.5% of new industrial robot installations in 2023. Adoption is rapid in Asia, Europe, and North America, driven by labor shortages and Industry 4.0 trends.
  • Research contributions span control algorithms, intuitive interfaces, and advanced sensing for cobot welding. Academic reviews and prototypes highlight improvements in human–robot teaming and productivity.
  • Major offerings include UR-based systems (e.g. Vectis), Yaskawa HC10XP cobots, FANUC CRX cobot welders, ABB GoFa/YuMi cells, and kits from companies like Lincoln Electric and AUBO (SwitchWeld).
  • Safety standards for cobot welders include robot safety (ISO 10218-1/2), collaborative safety (ISO/TS 15066) and welding safety (ISO 15011/ANSI Z49.1). Built-in features (collision detection, stops) ensure safe human-robot interaction.
  • Future trends: AI-assisted welding (vision, learning), cloud monitoring, and enhanced HRI. Training the workforce for programming and maintaining cobot welders will be essential as the technology matures.

References

edit
  1. ^ "The Ultimate Guide to Cobot Welding: Everything You Need to Know". Smooth Robotics. 18 March 2025. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  2. ^ "Robot History Timeline". International Federation of Robotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  3. ^ "The Evolution of Cobot Welding". American Welding Society. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  4. ^ "Welding Cobot Packages". Fanuc America. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  5. ^ Zhou, Clouudy (13 June 2025). "The Ultimate Guide To Welding Cobots in 2025". SwitchWeld. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  6. ^ "The Ultimate Guide to Cobot Welding". Smooth Robotics. 18 March 2025. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  7. ^ Schumacher, Simon; Hall, Roland; Waldman-Brown, Anna; Sanneman, Lindsay. "Technology Adoption Of Collaborative Robots For Welding in Small And Medium-sized Enterprises: A Case Study Analysis". Conference on Production Systems and Logistics. CPSL 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  8. ^ "Collaborative Welding Cobots Changing the Industry". Hirebotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  9. ^ Zhou, Cloudy (11 June 2025). "How To Find Out If A Welding Cobot Is Right For Your Shop". SwitchWeld. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  10. ^ "The Evolution of Cobot Welding". American Welding Society. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  11. ^ Zhou, Cloudy (11 June 2025). "Pros and Cons of Welding Automation in 2025". SwitchWeld. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  12. ^ Schumacher, Simon; Hall, Roland; Waldman-Brown, Anna; Sanneman, Lindsay. "Technology Adoption Of Collaborative Robots For Welding in Small And Medium-sized Enterprises: A Case Study Analysis". Conference on Production Systems and Logistics. CPSL 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  13. ^ "Collaborative Welding Cobots Changing the Industry". Hirebotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  14. ^ "Global Robot Density in Factories Doubled in Seven Years". International Federation of Robotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  15. ^ "Collaborative Robots - How Robots Work alongside Humans". International Federation of Robotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  16. ^ Global Welding Cobots Market Size By Type of Welding Cobots (Arc Welding Cobots, Laser Welding Cobots), By Payload Capacity (Below 5 kg, 5 kg to 10 kg), By Application Industry (Aerospace, Automotive), By End-User (Large Enterprises, Medium Enterprises), By Operating Environment (Manufacturing Floor, Field Operations), By Geographic Scope And Forecast. Verified Market Reports. February 2025.
  17. ^ Cao, Yue; Zhou, Quan; Yuan, Wei (December 12, 2024). "Human-robot collaborative assembly and welding: A review and analysis of the state of the art". Journal of Manufacturing Processes: 16.
  18. ^ Ferraguti, Federica; Villani, Valeria; Storchi, Chiara (February 2023). "MyWelder: A collaborative system for intuitive robot-assisted welding". Mechatronics. 89 102920. doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2022.102920. hdl:11380/1341607. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  19. ^ "Smart functions for intelligent cobot welding". Fanuc America. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  20. ^ Schumacher, Simon; Hall, Roland; Waldman-Brown, Anna; Sanneman, Lindsay. "Technology Adoption Of Collaborative Robots For Welding in Small And Medium-sized Enterprises: A Case Study Analysis". Conference on Production Systems and Logistics. CPSL 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  21. ^ "Collaborative Welding Cobots Changing the Industry". Hirebotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  22. ^ "Safe Cobot Welding". American Welding Society. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  23. ^ "Safe Cobot Welding". American Welding Society. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  24. ^ "Collaborative Robots - How Robots Work alongside Humans". IFR. International Federation of Robotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
  25. ^ "Collaborative Robots (Cobots) in Manufacturing: The Future of Human-Robot Teams". Dobot. Dobot Robotics. Retrieved 24 July 2025.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Welding_Cobots&oldid=1302971783"