Draft talk:Advanced Liquid Processing System
More references
editSee https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22Advanced+Liquid+Processing+System%22+Fukushima&ia=web Andrewa (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Update needed?
editLdm1954, Agree with the single source tag, but can you provide your source(s) showing that it needs an update? You must have them, so why not link to them? I'm keen to update the article, and you've obviously done more research than I have. Andrewa (talk) 21:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please do a Google search for the name. You then need to read them to see which are relevant and useful. I have not done that (and don't intend to). Ldm1954 (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- OK, done.
- But how is the draft out of date? Andrewa (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Come on now, as an administrator you should know that an article with no sources is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Plus blogs do not really help that much. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- N.B., the out of date was when the only source was 11 years old with the article claiming "being used". Ldm1954 (talk) 01:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- OK, so has that issue now been addressed? Andrewa (talk) 06:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- So, have you any evidence that it is not still being used, or that any of the other information in the draft is out of date? Andrewa (talk) 04:45, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- If we were to draftify every article whose sources are eleven or more years old, we would lose a lot of valuable content. But no matter, this has been addressed.
- And it is still "being used". You seem not to have checked this (and I guess you don't intend to). Andrewa (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- But the article did have sources, and none of them were blogs. Andrewa (talk) 04:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
- N.B., the out of date was when the only source was 11 years old with the article claiming "being used". Ldm1954 (talk) 01:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Come on now, as an administrator you should know that an article with no sources is inappropriate for Wikipedia. Plus blogs do not really help that much. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:10, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
Tags removed
editIn that Ldm1954 has not replied to substantiate their objections, I have removed the tags.
I'm not yet ready to submit it for restoration as a stub, but hope to do so soon.
Other contributions welcome of course! Andrewa (talk) 05:02, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Material to be added
editSee https://www.reuters.com/plus/the-science-and-global-standards-behind-fukushimas-alps-treated-water Published: March 9, 2023 After ALPS treatment and further dilution, the water discharged from TEPCO’s Fukushima plant... Andrewa (talk) 05:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
IAEA FAQs
edithttps://www.iaea.org/interactive/timeline/104850 February 2025
More to follow! Andrewa (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2025 (UTC)